ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1950

Cross-Sectional Analysis of Foot Osteoarthritis Frequency and Associated Factors: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project

Portia Flowers1, Amanda Nelson2, Howard J. Hillstrom3, Jordan B. Renner4, Joanne M. Jordan5 and Yvonne M. Golightly6, 1Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 2Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology and Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 3Rehabilitation, Hospital Special Surgery (HSS), New York, NY, 4UNC School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 5Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North CArolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 6Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: foot, obesity and osteoarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster III: Rheumatic Disease Risk and Outcomes

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:   The rising number of adults with arthritis and associated activity limitations present a serious public health problem.  Although studies have explored lower limb osteoarthritis (OA) at the knee and hip, few have focused on the foot.  Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the frequency of foot OA and identify potential associated risk factors.

Methods:  Participants were from the Johnston County OA Project, a community-based study of individuals in rural North Carolina with and without OA.  Weight-bearing anteroposterior and lateral radiographic images of the foot were obtained.  Based on the La Trobe radiographic atlas, foot radiographic OA (rOA) was defined as a score of 2 or more for osteophytes or joint space narrowing in at least one of the following 5 joint sites: 1st metatarsophalangeal joint, 1st & 2nd cuneo-metatarsal joints, navicular-1st cuneiform joint, and talo-navicular joint.  Foot symptoms were assessed via questionnaire by answering the question: “On most days of any one month in the last 12 months did you have pain, aching or stiffness in your [left/right] foot?”  Symptomatic OA (sxOA) was defined as symptoms in the presence of foot rOA.  At the joint level, separate logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations (GEE) to account for intra-person correlations were performed to examine discrete associations (odds ratios [OR]) of foot rOA or sxOA with age, body mass index (BMI), sex (women/men), race (African-American/Caucasian), history of foot injury (yes/no), and foot symptoms ([yes/no],  rOA models only).  Next, multiple logistic regression models with GEE were performed for foot rOA or sxOA outcomes adjusting for all factors (foot symptoms: rOA models only).

Results:   Of the 864 participants with available data (mean age 71 yrs, mean BMI 30.8 kg/m2, 68.2% women, 33.4% African American), 22.1% had rOA, 20.4% had foot symptoms, 5.3% had sxOA, and 3.8% reported prior foot injury.  In adjusted models, symptoms vs. no symptoms were associated with 1.48 times the odds of rOA (Table 1).  Compared to non-obese (BMI<30) participants, obese (BMI≥30) individuals had 1.74 times the odds of rOA (Table 1) and 3.30 times the odds of sxOA (Table 2).  African Americans vs. Caucasians had 1.49 times the odds of rOA; the association was not statistically significant in the adjusted model (Table 1). 

Conclusion:   In this community-based cohort, 1 out of 5 older adults had foot rOA and 1 out of 20 had foot sxOA.  Obesity was linked with foot OA, even when considering other factors, suggesting that weight reduction may be an important strategy, especially for individuals with sxOA.

 


 

Table 1 – Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations of participant characteristics with foot radiographic osteoarthritis (rOA, N=864, feet=1728).

Characteristic

Overall

N=864

Foot rOA

N=191 (22.1%)

No Foot rOA

N=673 (77.9%)

OR* (95% CI)

Adjusted** OR (95% CI)

Age: 70-94 years, n/N (%)

473/864 (54.8)

111/191 (58.1)

362/673 (53.8)

1.11 (0.81, 1.53)

1.30 (0.93, 1.80)

Age: 55-<70 years

391/864 (45.3)

80/191 (41.9)

311/673 (46.2)

referent

referent

BMI: ≥ 30 kg/m2, n/N (%)

435/864 (50.4)

118/191 (61.8)

317/673 (47.1)

1.79 (1.30, 2.48)

1.74 (1.25, 2.41)

BMI: <30 kg/m2, n/N (%)

429/864 (49.7)

73/191 (38.2)

356/673 (52.9)

referent

referent

Women, n/N (%)

589/864(68.2)

134/191 (70.2)

455/673 (67.6)

1.23 (0.87, 1.73)

referent

1.12 (0.79, 1.59)

Men, n/N (%)

275/864 (31.8)

57/191 (29.8)

218/673 (32.4)

referent

African American, n/N (%)

289/864 (33.4)

78/191 (40.8)

211/673 (31.4)

1.49 (1.09, 2.06)

referent

1.39 (0.99, 1.97)

Caucasian, n/N (%)

575/864 (66.6)

113/191 (59.2)

462/673 (68.6)

referent

Foot injury, n/N (%)

33/864 (3.8)

9/190 (4.7)

24/672 (3.6)

1.34 (0.53, 3.39)

referent3.39

1.44 (0.57, 3.66)

No foot injury, n/N (%)

829/862 (96.2)

181/190 (95.3)

648/672 (96.4)

referent

Foot symptoms, n/N (%)

176/863 (20.4)

51/191 (26.7)

125/672 (18.6)

1.46 (1.01, 2.12)

referent

1.48 (1.02, 2.16)

No foot symptoms, n/N (%)

687/863 (79.6)

140/191 (73.3)

547/672 (81.4)

referent

* adjusted only for intra-person correlation using generalized estimating equations

**adjusted for intra-person correlation and all other listed covariates

 

Table 2 –  Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for associations of participant characteristics with foot symptomatic osteoarthritis (sxOA, N=863, feet=1726).

Characteristic

Overall

N=863

Foot sxOA

N=46 (5.3%)

No Foot sxOA

N=817 (94.7%)

OR* (95% CI)

Adjusted** OR (95% CI)

Age: 70-94 years, n/N (%)

472/863 (54.7)

23/46 (50.0)

449/817 (55.0)

0.94 (0.51, 1.75)

1.10 (0.58, 2.11)

Age: 55-<70 years

391/863 (45.3)

23/46 (50.0)

368/817 (45.0)

referent

referent

BMI: ≥ 30 kg/m2, n/N (%)

435/863 (50.4)

34/46 (73.9)

401/817 (49.1)

3.19 (1.59, 6.40)

3.30 (1.60, 6.83)

BMI: <30 kg/m2, n/N (%)

428/863 (49.6)

12/46 (26.1)

416/817 (50.9)

referent

referent

Women, n/N (%)

588/863(68.1)

35/46 (76.1)

553/817 (67.7)

1.49 (0.72, 3.06)

referent

1.49 (0.67, 3.30)

Men, n/N (%)

275/863 (31.9)

11/46 (23.9)

264/817 (32.3)

referent

African American, n/N (%)

289/863 (33.5)

15/46 (32.6)

274/817 (33.5)

0.97 (0.50, 1.88)

referent

0.77 (0.37, 1.62)

Caucasian, n/N (%)

574/863 (66.5)

31/46 (67.4)

543/817 (66.5)

referent

Foot injury, n/N (%)

33/861 (3.8)

4/46 (8.7)

29/815 (3.6)

2.82 (0.72, 11.06)

referent

2.89 (0.69, 12.10)

No foot injury, n/N (%)

828/861 (96.2)

42/46 (91.3)

786/815 (96.4)

referent

* adjusted only for intra-person correlation using generalized estimating equations

**adjusted for intra-person correlation and all other listed covariates

 


Disclosure: P. Flowers, None; A. Nelson, QuantiaMD, 9,NIAMS-NIH, 2,RRF, 2; H. J. Hillstrom, None; J. B. Renner, None; J. M. Jordan, None; Y. M. Golightly, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Flowers P, Nelson A, Hillstrom HJ, Renner JB, Jordan JM, Golightly YM. Cross-Sectional Analysis of Foot Osteoarthritis Frequency and Associated Factors: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cross-sectional-analysis-of-foot-osteoarthritis-frequency-and-associated-factors-the-johnston-county-osteoarthritis-project/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cross-sectional-analysis-of-foot-osteoarthritis-frequency-and-associated-factors-the-johnston-county-osteoarthritis-project/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology