ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: L03

COVID-19 Vaccine Antibody Responses in Patients Treated with B-Cell Agents Depend on B-Cell Counts at Time of Vaccine

Kyriakos Kirou and Jeffrey Zhang-Sun, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Date of first publication: October 22, 2021

Keywords: B-Cell Targets, COVID-19, Late-Breaking 2021, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Late-Breaking Posters (L01 - L15)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Background/Purpose: Optimal COVID-19 vaccine responses are necessary to protect against severe infection. Patients with systemic rheumatic diseases (SRD) are at risk for not mounting adequate immune responses, at least partly because of treatment with immunosuppressive agents (ISA). Here we assess the effects of ISA on patients’ antibody (Ab) responses to COVID-19 vaccines.

Methods: This is a retrospective study based on chart data from patients with SRD in one of the authors’ (KK) practice, treated between 4/13/2021 and 8/6/2021. Patients who received full vaccination with either the Pfizer, Moderna, or Janssen vaccines and had received a SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG Ab test after their final, non-booster, vaccine dose were considered (N=88). To allow for comparisons of Spike Ab titers between patients, only those who had the Siemens SARS-CoV-2 IgG (COV2G) assay were included (reference range < 1.0 (negative) and >20.0 IU) (N=60). All ISA received at the time of vaccinations were recorded. Treatment with rituximab (RTX) was considered even if given more than 6 months prior to vaccines. Absolute counts of peripheral B cells for patients on B cell agents [RTX and/or belimumab (BEL)] were available for most patients within 3 months from the time of vaccination, except for 6 patients on BEL. Chi-square, Fisher’s exact test, T-test, Mann-Whitney and linear regression were used. Statistical tests and graphs were performed with GraphPad Prism v9.1.2. An alpha of 0.05 was considered for statistical significance.

Results: The most common diagnosis in our study population of 60 was SLE (n=29) (Table 1). Most received the Pfizer vaccine (n=40). Median time between final vaccine and COV2G assay was 52.5 days (IQR 30-84.5). Nine patients (15%) had negative Spike Ab responses to the vaccine (recorded as 0), 30 (50%) had Ab titers of >20.0 (recorded as 21), and 21 (35%) had titers between 1.0 and 20.0 IU. The scatterplot of B cell counts in patients who received any B cell agent vs. their corresponding Spike IgG titers revealed a cluster of patients with very low Ab titers, all with absolute B cell counts below 40/μl (Figure 1; marked with a circle). Among 5 patients with undetectable B cell counts, 4 of them had negative Ab responses. B cell treatment groups included RTX only (n=6; of whom 2 within 6 months prior to vaccine), RTX at least 6 months prior to vaccine followed by BEL (n=7), and BEL only (n=8). Patients who received any B cell treatment had much lower Ab responses compared to those who did not (Figure 2). Interestingly, patients who achieved B-cell counts < 40 around the time of vaccination (n=16) had much lower spike IgG titers than those patients with B-cell counts of &GreaterEqual;40 (n=5), independent of the B cell agent used. We detected no significant effect in Ab responses attributable to other ISA or biologic agents, but we found that vaccination with Moderna was associated with higher Spike IgG titers than with Pfizer (p=0.0386).

Conclusion: Both RTX and BEL, significantly inhibited Ab responses to COVID-19 vaccines compared to other ISA. For the most part, the lower the B cell count, the greater the association. Considering B cell counts may better inform decisions regarding timing of vaccination in SRD patients on RTX/BEL, as well as ISA dose modifications around vaccination dates.

Table 1. Description of study population

Figure 1. Correlation between B-cell count at time of vaccination and SARS-CoV_2 Spike IgG titer. Some data points overlap: 4 patients with undetected B cells and no Ab responses (0,0), and data points (20,0) and (21, 0) overlap. Data corresponding to B cell counts <40/microliter and very low Spike IgG titers are shown enclosed in a circle.

Figure 2. Effect of B cell agents, including rituximab and belimumab, as well as effect of low B-cell count on SARS-CoV_2 Spike IgG response. RTX=Rituximab, BEL=Belimumab. Red lines indicate medians. P-values comparing indicated pairs of groups are also shown.


K. Kirou, Aurnia, 1, Ensign Pharmaceuticals, 2, AMGEN, 12, Site PI in sponsored clinical trial, UCB, 12, Site PI in sponsored clincial trial, Astra Zeneca, 12, Site PI in sponsored clincial trial; J. Zhang-Sun, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kirou K, Zhang-Sun J. COVID-19 Vaccine Antibody Responses in Patients Treated with B-Cell Agents Depend on B-Cell Counts at Time of Vaccine [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/covid-19-vaccine-antibody-responses-in-patients-treated-with-b-cell-agents-depend-on-b-cell-counts-at-time-of-vaccine/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/covid-19-vaccine-antibody-responses-in-patients-treated-with-b-cell-agents-depend-on-b-cell-counts-at-time-of-vaccine/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology