ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2624

Cost-Effectiveness of Swapping Strategy for Established Psoriatic Arthritis and Immediate Versus Standard Swapping Strategy for Early Psoriatic Arthritis

Dongze Wu1, Tingting Xu2, Isaac T. Cheng1, Steven H.M. Lam1, Jiang Yue1, Priscilla Wong1, Edmund Li1, Tena K. Li1 and Lai-Shan Tam3, 1Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, The Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, Hong Kong, China, 2China Center for Health Development Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China; Department of Health Policy and Administration, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing, China, Beijing, China, 3Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, The Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic agents, Biologics, cost containment and psoriatic arthritis, Effective

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

For patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) failing the first TNF-inhibitor, switching to biologic DMARDs [bDMARDs] with different mechanism of actions (swapping strategy) may be superior than switching to another anti-TNF (cycling strategy) [1,2].

The aims of the study were to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 1) swapping strategy for established PsA and 2) immediate versus standard swapping strategy for early PsA from the Hong Kong (HK) societal perspective

Methods:

A swapping York model with life time horizon was developed for two hypothetical subpopulations:1) established PsA (age=47, HAQ=1.22, Figure A) received five swapping strategies and 2) early PsA (age=40, HAQ=0.71, Figure B) received immediate (start bDMARDs after diagnosis) or standard (initially given BSC and then start bDMARDs when HAQ increase to 1.22) use of the most cost-effective swapping strategy. Both subpopulations were further classified into mild to moderate psoriasis (MMP, PASI=0.73) and moderate to severe psoriasis (MSP, PASI=12.5). All five swapping strategies started with an anti-TNF, followed by secukinumab 300mg and then ustekinumab 45mg. The cost-effectiveness of each strategy was determined using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of £32,356/ quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) (HK Gross Domestic Product per capita).

Results:

For the base-case scenario, all five swapping strategies are cost-effective versus BSC strategy for established PsA, which are associated with greater QALY gain and lower treatment related direct costs, psoriasis cost and productivity loss. In established PsA with MMP and MSP, etanercept swapping strategy is likely to be the most cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost £9,518.93 and £9,084.58 per QALY gained over BSC strategy respectively. For early PsA with MMP and MSP, the base-case results indicated that standard etanercept swapping strategy was cost-saving (£-50,635.74 and £-67,843.32) and more effective (1.20 and 1.32 QALYs); while immediate etanercept swapping strategy was costlier (£13294.95 and £8986.16), more effective (3.82 and 3.27 QALY), and had relative low ICER (£3482.36 and £2745.35 per QALY gained) relative to BSC strategy.

Conclusion:

Swapping strategy showed favorable cost-effectiveness for established PsA as well as early PsA. The increased costs of biologic agents are offset by the gain in benefits from long-term HAQ reduction.

Reference

[1] Merola JF, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2017;47:29-37

[2] Cantini F, et al. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2017;47:183-192

[3] Kane D, et al. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003; 42:1460-8

Disclosures: This study has been partly presented at EULAR2018.

 


Disclosure: D. Wu, None; T. Xu, None; I. T. Cheng, None; S. H. M. Lam, None; J. Yue, None; P. Wong, None; E. Li, None; T. K. Li, None; L. S. Tam, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Wu D, Xu T, Cheng IT, Lam SHM, Yue J, Wong P, Li E, Li TK, Tam LS. Cost-Effectiveness of Swapping Strategy for Established Psoriatic Arthritis and Immediate Versus Standard Swapping Strategy for Early Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cost-effectiveness-of-swapping-strategy-for-established-psoriatic-arthritis-and-immediate-versus-standard-swapping-strategy-for-early-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cost-effectiveness-of-swapping-strategy-for-established-psoriatic-arthritis-and-immediate-versus-standard-swapping-strategy-for-early-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology