ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2833

Cost-Effectiveness of Competing Anticoagulation Strategies in Knee Replacement Patients

Savannah R. Smith1,2, Jeffrey N. Katz3,4 and Elena Losina3,4, 1Orthopedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, 3Orthopaedics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 4Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) and anticoagulation

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Title: Health Services Research I: Cost Drivers in Rheumatic Disease

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose: Total knee replacement (TKR) patients are routinely prescribed anticoagulation therapy to prevent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). Clinical guidelines are ambiguous regarding the specific agent and duration of prophylaxis. We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to evaluate the benefits and risks of 14- and 35-day therapy with the most commonly prescribed anticoagulants post-TKR.

Methods: We built a probabilistic, state-transition computer simulation model to assess clinical and economic outcomes of 14-day and 35-day anticoagulation therapy after TKR. Complications of TKR and therapy included DVT, PE, bleeding, and prosthetic joint infection (PJI). DVTs could progress to PE and were classified as symptomatic or asymptomatic, with asymptomatic carrying a greater risk of PE. Operative site bleeds were associated with an increased risk of PJI (RR = 11), while non-operative site bleeds (CNS, GI) carried a quality of life decrement and risk of death. We evaluated 5 anticoagulation agents: rivaroxaban, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), fondaparinux, warfarin, and aspirin. Each was associated with a unique reduction in DVT risk and an increased risk of bleeding compared with no anticoagulation; these risks were estimated from published literature. Costs included the agent and, when applicable, injection administration or monitoring costs (Table). We assumed a 1 year horizon and a willingness to pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000 per quality adjusted life year (QALY). Strategies with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) below WTP were deemed cost-effective.

Results: Aspirin at any duration was associated with the highest incidence of DVT and PE (28% and 5%, respectively). Extended fondaparinux resulted in the largest reduction in thromboses (DVT + PE) and greatest increase in bleeds (14% and 3%, respectively). Extended rivaroxaban reduced DVT incidence to 18% while increasing bleeds to 6%. Extended LMWH was associated with DVT and bleeding incidence of 19% and 4%, respectively. Both extended fondaparinux and rivaroxaban resulted in 0.74 QALYs; all other strategies, including no prophylaxis, resulted in fewer QALYs and higher costs and were therefore dominated (Table). The ICER for extended fondaparinux ($16.3M) greatly exceeded WTP; thus, extended rivaroxaban was the preferred strategy.

Conclusion: Extended rivaroxaban therapy after TKR is a cost-effective strategy to prevent DVT and PE while minimizing bleeding risk. The high cost and risk of bleeding of fondaparinux precluded it from being cost-effective. While there has been increased interest in using lower potency therapies, such as aspirin, these results demonstrate that aspirin’s low bleeding risk and low cost do not compensate for its poor efficacy in preventing DVT post-TKR.


Table.

Anticoagulant

Characteristics of Anticoagulation Therapies

RR DVT

RR Bleeds

Cost

Rivaroxaban

0.12

2.12

$7.90

LMWH

0.20

1.23

$40.90b

Fondaparinux

0.08

2.21

$46.77b

Warfarin

0.36

1.21

$7.23/$3.60a

Aspirin

0.62

1.00

$0.14

Anticoagulant Strategy

Results

Cost

QALY

ICER

Extended Rivaroxaban

$2,660

0.7398

Extended VKA

$2,820

0.7395

Dominated

Standard Rivaroxaban

$2,870

0.7392

Dominated

Extended ASA

$2,970

0.7389

Dominated

Standard VKA

$3,000

0.7390

Dominated

Standard ASA

$3,130

0.7386

Dominated

Standard LMWH

$3,370

0.7392

Dominated

Standard Fondaparinux

$3,390

0.7393

Dominated

No prophylaxis

$3,410

0.7382

Dominated

Extended LMWH

$3,700

0.7398

Dominated

Extended Fondaparinux

$3,780

0.7399

$16,300,000

a Includes cost of monitoring, presented as Week 1/Weeks 2+ due to extra monitoring during first week of treatment

b Includes cost of injection administration

RR = Relative risk, as compared with no anticoagulation

QALY = Quality-adjusted life year

ICER = Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio

Dominated = Strategy increased cost and decreased quality-adjusted life years


Disclosure: S. R. Smith, None; J. N. Katz, None; E. Losina, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Smith SR, Katz JN, Losina E. Cost-Effectiveness of Competing Anticoagulation Strategies in Knee Replacement Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cost-effectiveness-of-competing-anticoagulation-strategies-in-knee-replacement-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cost-effectiveness-of-competing-anticoagulation-strategies-in-knee-replacement-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology