ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1354

Correlates of Neuropathic Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis: The Modified Paindetect Questionnaire and the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Joshua Bernick1, Wilma M. Hopman2,3, Marc C. Hochberg4 and Jacqueline Hochman5, 1Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada, 2Research Methodologist, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada, 3Adjunct Faculty, Department of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada, 4Head, Division of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology; Vice Chair, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 5Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: osteoarthritis and pain management

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Poster II

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Cumulative evidence suggests central sensitization contributes to a neuropathic-like phenotype in a subset of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Using a variety of validated neuropathic pain (NP) questionnaires in musculoskeletal patient cohorts, factors including gender, body mass index, depression, insomnia and pain catastrophizing have been associated with neuropathic symptoms. In the current study, the modified painDetect Questionnaire (mPDQ) was administered to subjects enrolled in the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI), a well-established, longitudinal knee OA cohort, with the aim of further exploring the prevalence and correlates of NP specific to knee OA. A better understanding of the factors associated with NP in knee OA can help identify affected patients who may benefit from alternative treatment approaches that target NP pathways.

Methods: The mPDQ was administered to 699 subjects enrolled in the Baltimore OAI cohort during their scheduled 72-month follow up visit. Standard demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were collected as per the OAI study protocol. The presence of NP was determined using a previously defined mPDQ cut-point. Correlates of NP were evaluated through univariate analysis and logistic regression, and included factors relating to demographics, knee OA symptom severity, markers of chronic pain and pain intensity, psychological factors, functional disability, medical comorbidities and concurrent medication usage.

Results: Of the 699 subjects in the cohort, 476 were eligible for the analysis; 99 (21%) subjects were found to have NP symptoms (mPDQ score ≥ 13). Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis (KOOS) pain score, The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) total score, WOMAC physical function score, Von Korff pain score (VKP) and the Late Life Disability Instrument (LLDI) – limitation dimension were shown to be different between patients with and without NP (p< 0.01). Independent correlates (p<0.01) of NP were: WOMAC total score (OR=1.93), coping strategies – pain catastrophizing subscale (OR=1.23), VKP (OR=1.06), WOMAC physical function score (OR=1.02) and LLDI – limitation dimension (OR=0.98). Multivariate modelling found WOMAC total score (OR=2.07, p=0.018), coping strategies – pain catastrophizing subscale (OR=1.22, p=0.035) and VKP (OR=1.07, p<0.001) to be significant predictors of NP.

Conclusion: Similar to other studies, a subset of the Baltimore OAI knee OA cohort had a NP phenotype, which was associated with more pain catastrophizing and greater symptom burden. This study additionally found that a NP phenotype was associated with greater disability. Further studies are needed to determine if treatment targeted to the NP phenotype reduces knee OA symptom severity and functional impairment in affected individuals.

Domain

Variable

NP+

Median (Range)

NP–

Median (Range)

NP+

Odds Ratio (95% CI)

NP+

(p-value)

Demographics

Age

63 (52-83)

65 (51-85)

0.98 (0.96-1.01)

0.159

Knee OA Symptom Severity

KOOS: Pain Score

83.3 (18.8-100)

91.7 (0-100)

0.99 (0.98-1.00)

0.014

WOMAC: Total Score

15.35 (0-75.4)

7 (0-76)

1.01 (1.00-1.03)

0.013

WOMAC: Pain Score

3 (0-15)

1 (0-20)

1.05 (0.99-1.10)

0.085

Pain Intensity

Von Korff Pain Score

63.33 (10-100)

26.67 (0-100)

1.06 (1.05-1.08)

< 0.001**

Psychological Factors

Coping Strategies – Pain Catastrophizing Subscale

1 (0-6)

0 (0-6)

1.23 (1.08-1.40)

0.002*

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Score

8 (0-36)

5.50 (0-40)

1.03 (1.00-1.05)

0.023

KOOS: Quality of Life Score

68.8 (6.3-100)

68.8 (0-100)

0.99 (0.98-1.00)

0.017

Functional Disability

Late Life Disability Instrument: Frequency Dimension

52.23

(35.23-70.61)

53.71

(37.39-76.31)

0.96 (0.93-1.00)

0.046

Late Life Disability Instrument: Limitation Dimension

68.19

(39.63-100)

77.57

(41.54-100)

0.98 (0.97-0.99)

0.003*

WOMAC: Physical Function Score

10.1 (0-54.4)

4.3 (0-53.1)

1.02 (1.01-1.04)

0.005*

Domain

Variable

NP+

Frequency (%)

NP–

Frequency (%)

NP+

Odds Ratio (95% CI)

NP+

(p-value)

Demographics

Gender (female)

68 (68.7)

218 (57.8)

1.6 (1.00-2.56)

0.051

Knee OA Symptom Severity

WOMAC: Total Score, (≥ 17)

48 (48.5)

172 (36.1)

1.93 (1.23-3.03)

0.004*

Psychological Factors

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale Score (≥ 16)

26 (26.3)

84 (17.7)

1.96 (1.15-3.32)

0.013

Table 1: Variables associated with neuropathic pain. *p<0.01; **p<0.001


Disclosure: J. Bernick, None; W. M. Hopman, None; M. C. Hochberg, None; J. Hochman, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bernick J, Hopman WM, Hochberg MC, Hochman J. Correlates of Neuropathic Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis: The Modified Paindetect Questionnaire and the Osteoarthritis Initiative [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/correlates-of-neuropathic-pain-in-knee-osteoarthritis-the-modified-paindetect-questionnaire-and-the-osteoarthritis-initiative/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/correlates-of-neuropathic-pain-in-knee-osteoarthritis-the-modified-paindetect-questionnaire-and-the-osteoarthritis-initiative/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology