ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 771

Convergent Validity of New Disease Assessment Instruments in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Relation to Sledai-2K

Christopher Collins1, W. Winn Chatham2, Howard Busch3, Norman B. Gaylis4, Emily Hautamaki5 and Siva Narayanan6, 1MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, 2Medicine/Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3Science & Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, 4Arthritis & Rheumatic Disease Specialties, Aventura, FL, 5Ipsos Healthcare, Washington, DC, 6Global Evidence, Value and Access, Ipsos Healthcare, Washington, DC

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Disease Activity, SLE and Validity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster Session I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Current validated disease assessment instruments (DAIs) in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) such as SLEDAI-2K and BILAG, require disease expertise and/or involve complex scoring systems, and are often impractical for use in daily clinical practice and hence are seldom used routinely in clinical practice. In an attempt to address this issue, several new simplified DAIs in SLE are in different stages of development, including SLE Activity Tracking Evaluation Tool (LAST; 14 items; includes medications, Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) 0-10 scale, Patient Global Assessment (0-10 scale), C3, C4 & anti-dsDNA lab measures), Clinical LAST (C-LAST; 11 items; similar to LAST, without lab measures), Total Lupus Activity Score (TLAS; 30 items; includes 15 physician clinical assessments and 15 patient self-assessment of lupus symptoms), and Simple Disease Assessment for People with Lupus Erythematosus (SIMPLE; 17 items; includes patient self-assessment of lupus symptoms, Lupus Impact Tracker, steroid medication, C3, C4 & proteinuria). The primary objective of this analysis is to assess the convergent validity of these various tools as well as PhGA indices in relation to SLEDAI-2K at baseline in a diverse sample of SLE patients in the US.

Methods: This is a prospective real-world observational cohort study of SLE patients receiving standard care at two academic and two private practice settings in the US. Consecutive patients meeting study criteria were screened within the study recruitment window. Physicians and patients are asked to complete their respective portions of the studied instruments at four different time points: baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months; PhGA:0-3 scale and SLEDAI-2K was completed for all patients; BILAG was assessed for patients at the academic sites; TLAS and SIMPLE for approx. 152 patients each; LAST & C-LAST algorithm for 169 patients each. Baseline data (presented here) was analyzed and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated comparing mean SLEDAI-2K score to the individual DAI scores. Correlations with BILAG will be assessed in the longitudinal analysis in the future.

Results: A total of 201 SLE patients consented and enrolled in the study (mean age: 45 yrs; female: 91%; Black/African American (AA): 56%; Hispanic: 10%). At study entry (baseline), mean SLEDAI-2K score was 3.4 (range: 0-16); each of the DAIs (PhGA:0-10 scale, PhGA:0-3 scale, LAST, C-LAST, SIMPLE & TLAS) had a statistically significant positive correlation with the SLEDAI-2K, as shown in table-1. Analysis stratified by AA and non-AA status revealed similarly significant correlations between SLEDAI-2K and the other DAIs.

Conclusion: In the baseline cross-sectional analysis, each of the studied DAIs appeared to have convergent validity with the SLEDAI-2K. Further analyses with longitudinal data will assess additional metric properties of these instruments.

Table 1. DAI Scores and Correlations with SLEDAI-2K

Assessments

n

Median Score (IQR)

Mean Score (SD; range)

Pearson correlation with SLEDAI-2K

r; p-value

LAST

(0=No activity – 100=High activity)

169

23.0 (15.0-32.0)

23.9 (13.0; 0-70.0)

0.566; <0.0001

PhGA:0-10 scale

(0=No activity – 10=High activity)

168

2 (1-3)

2.3 (1.9; 0–8)

0.563; <0.0001

SIMPLE

(0=No activity – 100=High activity)

152

21.5 (15.1-27.8)

23.2 (11.2; 6.2-68.5)

0.560; <0.0001

PhGA:0-3 scale

(0=No activity – 3=High activity)

201

1 (N/A)

0.9 (0.7; 0-3)

0.553; <0.0001

C-LAST

(0=No activity – 70=High activity)

169

20.0 (12.5-27.5)

20.3 (11.1; 0-50.0)

0.450; <0.0001

TLAS

(0=No activity – 120=High activity)

153

56 (50-64)

  56.9 (10.8; 31.0-86.0)

0.348; <0.0001

SLEDAI-2K

(0=No activity – 105=High activity)

199

2 (0-6)

3.4 (3.2; 0-16)

N/A


Disclosure: C. Collins, GlaxoSmithKline, 2; W. W. Chatham, GlaxoSmithKline, 2; H. Busch, GlaxoSmithKline, 2; N. B. Gaylis, GlaxoSmithKline, 2; E. Hautamaki, GlaxoSmithKline, 2; S. Narayanan, GlaxoSmithKline, 2,GlaxoSmithKline, 1.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Collins C, Chatham WW, Busch H, Gaylis NB, Hautamaki E, Narayanan S. Convergent Validity of New Disease Assessment Instruments in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in Relation to Sledai-2K [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/convergent-validity-of-new-disease-assessment-instruments-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-in-relation-to-sledai-2k/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/convergent-validity-of-new-disease-assessment-instruments-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-in-relation-to-sledai-2k/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology