ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0417

Contraception in Community Rheumatology Practices

Megan Clowse1, Julie Chiesa2, Pamela Freeman3, Bansari Gujar4, Kelley Jones5, Richard Jones6, Ann Marslett7, Amanda Snyderman5 and Leah Zulig8, 1Duke University, Chapel Hill, NC, 2InfoDirectors, Durham, NC, 3Rheumatology Associates of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 4Rheumatology Associates of Baltimore, Towson, MD, 5Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, 6Clinic for Rheumatic Diseases, Northport, AL, 7Rheumatology Associates of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, 8Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: pregnancy, prevention, Women's health

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Saturday, November 16, 2024

Title: Reproductive Issues in Rheumatic Disorders Poster

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Most prior studies of contraception in women with rheumatic disease focused on academic centers. In this study of non-academic rheumatology practices, we sought to identify the frequency of contraceptive use, types of contraceptives, and variations between sites and based on the woman’s race/ethnicity, age, and rheumatic diagnosis.

Methods: In 2023, three community rheumatology practices, each with a single clinic with multiple providers located in the South, Southeast, and Mid-Atlantic regions documented contraception in women of reproductive age. The study population included all visits for women ages 18-44. Persons of color (POC) include all non-White, non-Hispanic women based on the race and ethnicity data reported by the clinics. SLE diagnosis was defined by the ICD-10 code billed at the visit and contraception was categorized by the most effective method reported for each woman. To account for multiple comparisons, we set statistical significance at p< 0.01.

Results: 2,104 women had a clinic visit during this period and 1,027 (48.8%) had contraception documented. Race and ethnicity were missing for many patients, but 40.6% with recorded race and/or ethnicity were POC, the majority of whom were Black. Of those with contraception documentation, the frequency of POC and SLE, but not age, varied by clinic (Table 1). Overall, contraception documentation did not depend on the woman’s age or race/ethnicity, but women with SLE were more likely to have contraception documented (Table 2).

Between 26.2-29.8% of women in every clinic reported not using contraception (Figure 2). Effective hormonal contraceptives were used by 17.1-25.6% of women; LARC by 11.3-13.9% of women. More variability between clinics was found for less effective/barrier methods (2.0-15.5%) and permanent contraception (19.6-42.6%). Hysterectomy was four times as common in one clinic (18.1%) compared to the other two (4.1-4.2%, p-value< 0.001).

The frequency of any contraception use did not vary by age. Compared to women 30-39 and 40-45, women under 30 were significantly more likely to be using hormonal contraception (34.2% versus 10.9-22.4%) and less likely to have permanent contraception (3.3% vs 24.1-46.2%). Contraceptive use did not vary significantly between POC and White women nor women with or without SLE.

Conclusion: The frequency of contraceptive use and types found in this study are similar to those reported in the general population with nearly a third not using contraception. The frequency of contraceptive use, LARC, and hormonal contraceptives was similar between the clinics. We suspect local gynecologic practice may be the cause for the wide difference in the frequency of permanent contraception through hysterectomy. As anticipated, age impacted the type of contraception use, but not race/ethnicity or SLE diagnosis. This study demonstrates the feasibility of systematically asking and documenting contraceptive use in community rheumatology practices. This approach identified a third of the women potentially at risk for an unexpected pregnancy.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: M. Clowse: AstraZeneca, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; J. Chiesa: None; P. Freeman: None; B. Gujar: None; K. Jones: None; R. Jones: None; A. Marslett: None; A. Snyderman: GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5; L. Zulig: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Clowse M, Chiesa J, Freeman P, Gujar B, Jones K, Jones R, Marslett A, Snyderman A, Zulig L. Contraception in Community Rheumatology Practices [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/contraception-in-community-rheumatology-practices/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/contraception-in-community-rheumatology-practices/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology