ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1149

Contemporary Prevalence of Gout and Hyperuricemia in the United States (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES] 2015-2016) and Decadal Trends (NHANES 2007-2016)

Michael Chen-Xu1, Chio Yokose2, Michael Pillinger3 and Hyon K. Choi2, 1General Medicine, Wairarapa District Health Board, Masterton, New Zealand, 2Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Medicine/Rheumatology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: gout and hyperuricemia

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health Poster II: Gout, Ankylosing Spondylitis, Osteoarthritis, Osteoporosis, Pain, and Function

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The prevalences of gout and hyperuricemia from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2007-2008 were 3.9% (8.3 million) and 21.4% (43.3 million individuals), respectively, representing increases of 44% and 18% from a decade earlier (Zhu et al., Arthr Rheum. Oct 2011, pp 3136–3141). Our objective was to determine the latest national prevalence estimates (NHANES 2015-2016) of gout and hyperuricemia and their decadal trends from NHANES 2007-2016.

Methods: Using data from 5,467 participants in the NHANES 2015-2016, we estimated the prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia. During the home interview in each NHANES survey cycle, all participants were asked about a history of health professional- or physician-diagnosed gout. Our definition of hyperuricemia was a serum urate level (SUL) >7.0mg/dL in men and >5.7mg/dL in women. We explored potential secular trends in these estimates and their possible explanations by comparing the latest estimates with those from 22,654 participants from NHANES 2007-2014. All statistical analyses were conducted using survey commands of Stata (Version 15.1, Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas) to adjust for clusters and strata of the complex sample design as well as incorporate sample weights to generate estimates for the total civilian, non-institutionalized population of the US. Population estimates (in millions) were calculated as per the NHANES analytic guidelines.

Results: The prevalence of gout was 3.9% (9.2 million) among US adults in 2015-2016 (5.2% [5.9 million] among men and 2.7% [3.3 million] among women) (Table). The mean SULs were 6.0mg/dL among men and 4.8mg/dL among women, which corresponds to hyperuricemia prevalences of 20.2% and 20.0%, respectively. The prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia among US adults was stable over the past decade (P-value for trend= 0.69 and 0.24 for men and women, respectively). The decadal trends for gout remained stable when stratified by sex, hypertension, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and obesity (all P-values for trend> 0.05).

Conclusion: These findings from this nationally-representative sample of US adults suggest that the prevalences of gout and hyperuricemia remain substantial (9.2 and 47.1 million adults, respectively), although they appeared to have plateaued over the past decade. This may be related to plateauing frequency of CKD (Murphy et al., Ann Intern Med. Oct 2016, pp 473–481), and hypertension (Fryar et al., NCHS data brief, no., 289. Oct 2017).

Table. Prevalence of Gout and Hyperuricemia and Number of Affected Adults in the US, NHANES 2015-2016*

Gout

Hyperuricemia

Prevalence, % (95% CI)

N of US adults,

millions

Prevalence

% (95% CI)

N of US adults,

millions

All

3.9 (3.3, 4.7)

9.18

20.1 (17.8, 22.4)

47.13

Sex

Male

5.2 (4.4, 6.2)

5.86

20.2 (16.6, 24.3)

22.76

Female

2.7 (2.0, 3.8)

3.33

20.0 (17.8, 22.4)

24.37

Age

20-39

0.7 (0.3, 1.5)

0.56

16.6 (13.6, 20.1)

14.07

40-59

3.4 (2.2, 5.3)

2.89

18.7 (15.1, 22.9)

15.71

60-79

8.8 (7.2, 10.7)

4.77

26.1 (22.7, 29.8)

14.20

³ 80

8.7 (5.8, 12.7)

0.97

27.8 (21.0, 35.8)

3.10

Race/ethnicity

Non-Hispanic White

4.0 (3.1, 5.3)

6.13

21.4 (18.1, 25.1)

32.59

Non-Hispanic Black

4.8 (3.8, 6.0)

1.31

22.6 (20.9, 24.3)

6.15

Hispanic

2.0 (1.4, 2.9)

0.73

14.9 (12.6, 17.5)

5.33

Other

5.2 (3.4, 7.9)

0.99

17.0 (13.8, 20.7)

3.23

* The data were adjusted for clusters and strata of the complex sample design of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2015–2016, with incorporation of sample weights. 95% CI = 95% confidence interval


Disclosure: M. Chen-Xu, None; C. Yokose, None; M. Pillinger, Horizon Pharmaceuticals, 5,Ironwood, 5,SOBI, 5; H. K. Choi, Takeda, Selecta, Kowa, and Horizon, 5,Selecta and Horizon, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Chen-Xu M, Yokose C, Pillinger M, Choi HK. Contemporary Prevalence of Gout and Hyperuricemia in the United States (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [NHANES] 2015-2016) and Decadal Trends (NHANES 2007-2016) [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/contemporary-prevalence-of-gout-and-hyperuricemia-in-the-united-states-national-health-and-nutrition-examination-survey-nhanes-2015-2016-and-decadal-trends-nhanes-2007-2016/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/contemporary-prevalence-of-gout-and-hyperuricemia-in-the-united-states-national-health-and-nutrition-examination-survey-nhanes-2015-2016-and-decadal-trends-nhanes-2007-2016/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology