ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1878

Consensus Definitions for MRI Lesions in the Spine of Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis: First Analysis from the Assessments in SpondyloArthritis International Society Classification Cohort

Walter Maksymowych1, Iris Eshed2, Pedro M Machado3, Susanne J Pedersen4, Ulrich Weber5, Manouk de Hooge6, Joachim Sieper7, Stephanie Wichuk1, Denis Poddubnyy8, Martin Rudwaleit9, Désirée van der Heijde10, Robert Landewé11, Robert G Lambert12, Mikkel Østergaard13 and Xenofon Baraliakos14, 1University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 2Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel, 3University College London, London, United Kingdom, 4Rigshospitalet University, Copenhagen, Denmark, 5University of South Denmark, Odense, Denmark, 6Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium, 7Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 8Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 9Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Klinikum Bielefeld, Germany, 10Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 11Amsterdam University Medical Center & Zuyderland Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 12University of Alberta and CARE Arthritis, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 13Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 14Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Spondylarthropathies, spondyloarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster III: Axial SpA

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: A broad spectrum of MRI lesions has been described in the spine of patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and a recent consensus from the ASAS MRI group has culminated in updated spine lesion definitions (ASAS_MRI_defn)1. There has been no central reader evaluation of MRI spine scans from the ASAS Classification Cohort (ASAS-CC)2. We aimed to determine the spectrum and compare the frequencies of active and structural lesions on MRI images of the spine from the ASAS-CC according to the consensus ASAS_MRI_defn update, the diagnosis of axSpA, and the presence of radiographic sacroiliitis.

Methods: ASAS_MRI_defn were recorded by 9 central readers in an eCRF that comprises global assessment (MRI indicative of axSpA yes/no) and detailed scoring of each discovertebral unit as well as lateral and posterior structures. Detailed scoring is based on slices viewed in sagittal orientation and for the thoracic and lumbar spine is subdivided into assessment of central and lateral slices that include or do not include the spinal canal, respectively. Vertebral corner bone marrow edema (VCBME) and corner fat (VCFAT) lesions were recorded if present on 2 slices; facet joint, lateral slice, and posterior element inflammatory lesions were recorded if present on a single slice. Vertebral corner erosion, bone spurs, and ankylosis (intervertebral, facet) were each scored on a single slice. Comparison of active and structural lesion frequencies according to local rheumatologist diagnosis of axSpA and the presence of radiographic sacroiliitis was assessed descriptively according to individual, ≥2, and majority reader (≥5/9) concordant data.

Results: MRI scans of the entire spine were available from 69 cases and rheumatologist diagnosis in 64. AxSpA was diagnosed in 44 (68.8%). VCBME was most frequent, ≥1 lesion being recorded in 32(46.4%) and 19 (27.5%) by ≥2 and majority of readers, respectively. VCFAT was the most frequent structural lesion, ≥1 lesion being recorded in 24 (34.8%) and 14 (20.3%) by ≥2 and majority of readers, respectively. There were significantly more VCBME lesions in axSpA patients (mean(SD):1.8 (2.7)) than non-axSpA (mean(SD):0.3 (0.5)) (p< 0.001) while differences in VCFAT were not significant (Table 1). The presence of ≥2 VCBME lesions had 90-95% specificity for axSpA. Significantly more VCBME and VCFAT were observed in the setting of radiographic sacroiliitis (modified New York criteria (mNY)) (Table 2).

Conclusion: Spine lesions on MRI are relatively frequent in patients with undiagnosed back pain presenting to the rheumatologist. The presence of at least 2 VCBME lesions (each on 2 consecutive sagittal slices and without degenerative disc disease), but not VCFAT, may have some diagnostic utility.  

  1. Maksymowych WP, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol 70 (suppl 10): 654, 2018
  2. Rudwaleit et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2009;68: 777-83


Disclosure: W. Maksymowych, AbbVie, 2, 5, Janssen, 5, Lilly, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Gilead, 5, UCB Pharma, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Galapagos, 5; I. Eshed, None; P. Machado, Abbvie, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, Novartis, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Pfizer, 8; S. Pedersen, None; U. Weber, None; M. de Hooge, None; J. Sieper, AbbVie, 5, Novartis, 5, 8, Lilly, 8, Janssen, 5, Merck, 5, 8; S. Wichuk, None; D. Poddubnyy, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 8, MSD, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, BioCad, 5, Gilead, 5, GSK, 5, UCB, 5, 8, BMS, 8; M. Rudwaleit, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 5, 8, Eli Lilly and Company, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 5, 8, AbbVie, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Celgene, 8, Roche, 5, 8, Merck Sharp & Dohme, 5, 8; D. van der Heijde, AbbVie, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Cyxone, 5, Galapagos NV, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5, UCB Pharma, 5, Amgen Inc., 5, Astellas, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Celgene, 5, Daiichi-Sankyo, 5, Janssen, 5, Merck, 5, Regeneron, 5, Roche, 5, Sanofi, 5, Takeda, 5, Imaging Rheumatology bv, 3, Eisai, 5; R. Landewé, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, AstraZeneca, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, Galapagos, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Rheumatology Consultancy BV, 1, Ablynx, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, Gilead, 5, Novo Nordisk, 5, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Schering, 2, 5, 8, TiGenix, 5; R. Lambert, None; M. Østergaard, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Hospira, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Merck, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Novo Nordisk, 5, Orion, 5, 8, Regeneron, 5, Roche, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, 8, Sandoz, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8; X. Baraliakos, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Chugai, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Merck, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Maksymowych W, Eshed I, Machado P, Pedersen S, Weber U, de Hooge M, Sieper J, Wichuk S, Poddubnyy D, Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewé R, Lambert R, Østergaard M, Baraliakos X. Consensus Definitions for MRI Lesions in the Spine of Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis: First Analysis from the Assessments in SpondyloArthritis International Society Classification Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/consensus-definitions-for-mri-lesions-in-the-spine-of-patients-with-axial-spondyloarthritis-first-analysis-from-the-assessments-in-spondyloarthritis-international-society-classification-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/consensus-definitions-for-mri-lesions-in-the-spine-of-patients-with-axial-spondyloarthritis-first-analysis-from-the-assessments-in-spondyloarthritis-international-society-classification-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology