ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2750

Concordance Between Patient and Physician Global Assessment of the Disease in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis

Josefina Gallino Yanzi1, Osvaldo Luis Cerda2, Margarita Landi2, Cecilia Zaffarana2, Emilce Schneeberger2 and Gustavo Citera1, 1Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2Rheumatology Section, Instituto de Rehabilitación Psicofísica, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Assessment, patient outcomes, physician data and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment - Poster III

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  In Rheumatoid Arthritis it has been observed a significant discrepancy in the global assessment of the disease by the patient and physician and this was not extensively evaluated in patients with Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA). The purpose of our study was to evaluate the agreement and the variables that influence global disease assessment by the patient (PGA) and physician (PhGA) in patients with PsA

Methods:  Patients with PsA according to CASPAR criteria ≥ 18 years, belonging to RAPSODIA (Registro de Artritis Psoriática IREP, Argentina) cohort were included. Demographic data, clinical features and treatment received were recorded. Peripheral joint assessment was performed by counting 66/68 swollen/tender joints and the following indexes were calculated DAS28, DAPSA, CPDAI and MDA. Cutaneous involvement was evaluated by PASI. Morning stiffness, pain and global assessment of disease activity by the patient and physician were assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS 0-10cm). Patients completed BASDAI, HAQ, BASFI, ASQoL and PsAQoL questionnaires.

Results: 110 patients were included, 56 males (50.9%), with a median age of 55 years (IQR 45-63) and median disease duration of 10 years (IQR 6-17). Pain m 5 cm (IQR 2.6-7), PGA m 4.25 cm (IQR 2.13-7) and PhGA m 3 cm (IQR 1.13-5). The PGA had very good correlation with pain (Rho= 0.76), BASFI (Rho= 0.7) and BASDAI (Rho= 0.7) and acceptable with PsAQoL (Rho= 0.56), and had no correlation with the number of swollen and tender joints (Rho: 0.04 and 0.05, respectively). By contrast, the PhGA had a good correlation with pain (Rho= 0.65), BASDAI (Rho= 0.62) and PGA (Rho= 0.64), acceptable with BASFI (Rho= 0.59), number of swollen joints (Rho= 0.52), number of tender joints (Rho: 0.41) and PsAQoL (Rho= 0.43) and low correlation with PASI (Rho= 0.21). In two multiple linear regression analysis, using PhGA and PGA as dependent variables, pain was the main variable that was significantly associated with both of them (βcoef: 0.529, p<0.001 and βcoef: 0.481, p= 0.002, respectively). Taking Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) as a measure of ideal state, we performed a logistic regression analysis, considering MDA as a dependent variable. PGA had a greater association as compared to the physician’s global assessment [OR: 0.61 (95%CI: 0.42-0.89), p= 0.01 vs 0.49 (95%CI: 0.29-0.87), p= 0.02]

Conclusion: The evaluation of the global assessment of disease activity in PsA by the patient and physician showed good correlation. Pain was the variable most strongly influenced both assessments. The evaluation of the disease by the patient had more association with MDA.


Disclosure: J. Gallino Yanzi, None; O. L. Cerda, None; M. Landi, None; C. Zaffarana, None; E. Schneeberger, None; G. Citera, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gallino Yanzi J, Cerda OL, Landi M, Zaffarana C, Schneeberger E, Citera G. Concordance Between Patient and Physician Global Assessment of the Disease in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/concordance-between-patient-and-physician-global-assessment-of-the-disease-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/concordance-between-patient-and-physician-global-assessment-of-the-disease-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology