ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1447

Comparison of Ultra High‐resolution Ultrasound (UHFUS) of Labial Salivary Glands and Conventional Salivary Gland Ultrasonography in Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome Assessment

Chiara Baldini1, Francesco Ferro 1, Nicoletta Luciano 1, Saverio Vitali 2, Rossana Izzetti 3, Silvia Fonzetti 4, Veronica Iodice 2, Marta Mosca 5, Valentina Donati 6 and Davide Caramella 2, 1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, Pisa, Italy, 2Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 3Department of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa,, Pisa, Italy, 4University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 5Rheumatology Unit, Department of clinical and experimental medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 6University of Pisa, Pisa

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Sjogren's syndrome, ultrasonography and salivary gland

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Sjögrenʼs Syndrome – Basic & Clinical Science Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Labial salivary gland (LSG) biopsy remains a key tool for the diagnosis of primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS). Nowadays, however, interest is growing in non‐invasive methods able to supplement more invasive diagnostic procedures. Last‐generation ultra high‐resolution ultrasound (UHFUS) transducers, which can produce frequencies up to 70 MHz and achieve tissue resolution up to 30 μm, have recently opened up new possibilities for the study of a variety of superficial targets. In this work, we investigated the diagnostic accuracy of UHFUS in detecting LSGs involvement in patients with suspected SS and compared UHFUS findings with both LSG histopathology and conventional SGUS.

Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients undergoing a complete diagnostic work-up for suspected pSS, including conventional SGUS and LSG biopsy. The same expert pathologist assessed LSG focus score (FS) also reporting  number of foci, presence of ectopic germinal centers (GCs) and percentage of total area infiltrated. UHFUS of LSG was performed by specialized radiologists scanning first the central compartment of the inferior lip, and then both peripheral compartments. The following parameters were evaluated: distribution of the glands, parenchymal inhomogeneity (score 0-3, from normal to evident), fibrosis and eco color-Doppler vascular pattern and grade of vascular intensity.

Results: We included 75 patients with suspected pSS. At the end of the work-up, pSS diagnosis was confirmed in 42/75 (56%) cases. With respect to no-SS sicca controls, pSS patients presented higher UHFUS inhomogeneity scores in both central (p=0.001) and peripheral labial compartments (p=0.001) as well as higher degree of central (p=0.003) and peripheral fibrosis (p=0.002). Considering a score ≥2 in parenchymal inhomogeneity as suggestive for pSS, UHFUS appeared less specific than conventional SGUS (UHFUS Sp=72% vs SGUS Sp=93%) but more sensitive (UHFUS Se=79%  vs SGUS Se = 53%). Moreover, in comparison with conventional SGUS, the correlation coefficients between UHFUS inhomogeneity and LSG FS (UHFUS r=0.503** vs SGUS r=0.290*), number of foci (UHFUS r=0.493** vs SGUS r=0.307*), number of ectopic GCs (UHFUS r=0.315** vs SGUS r=0.173), and percentage of total area infiltrated (UHFUS r=0.506** vs SGUS r=0.332) were significantly higher.

Conclusion: The use of UHFUS of LSG in pSS appeared feasible and sensitive potentially offering unique advantages over the conventional imaging modalities in pSS assessment.


Disclosure: C. Baldini, None; F. Ferro, None; N. Luciano, None; S. Vitali, None; R. Izzetti, None; S. Fonzetti, None; V. Iodice, None; M. Mosca, None; V. Donati, None; D. Caramella, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Baldini C, Ferro F, Luciano N, Vitali S, Izzetti R, Fonzetti S, Iodice V, Mosca M, Donati V, Caramella D. Comparison of Ultra High‐resolution Ultrasound (UHFUS) of Labial Salivary Glands and Conventional Salivary Gland Ultrasonography in Primary Sjögren’s Syndrome Assessment [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-ultra-high%e2%80%90resolution-ultrasound-uhfus-of-labial-salivary-glands-and-conventional-salivary-gland-ultrasonography-in-primary-sjogrens-syndrome-assessment/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-ultra-high%e2%80%90resolution-ultrasound-uhfus-of-labial-salivary-glands-and-conventional-salivary-gland-ultrasonography-in-primary-sjogrens-syndrome-assessment/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology