ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 949

Comparison of Treatment Response, Remission Rate and Drug Adherence in Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Patients Treated with Etanercept, Adalimumab or Tocilizumab

Gerd Horneff1,2, Ariane Klein3, Kirsten Minden4,5, Hans-Iko Huppertz6, Frank Weller-Heinemann7, Jasmin B. Kuemmerle-Deschner8, Johannes Peter Haas9 and Toni Hospach10, 1Asklepios Klinik Zentrum für Allgemeine Paediatrie und Neonatologie, Sankt Augustin, Germany, 2Department of Pediatrics, Centre of Pediatric Rheumatology, Sankt Augustin, Germany, 3Center of Pediatrics and Neonatology, Asklepios Clinic Sankt Augustin, Sankt Augustin, Germany, 4Epidemiology, Charite, DRFZ, Berlin, Germany, 5Children’s University Hospital Charite/German Rheumatism Research Centre Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 6Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Prof.-Hess-Kinderklinik, Bremen, Germany, 7Prof.-Hess-Kinderklinik, Bremen,, Berlin, Germany, 8Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Klinik fuer Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Tübingen, Germany, 9German Center for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany, 10Pediatrics, Olgahospital, Klinikum Stuttgart, Stuttgard, Germany

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Biologic drugs, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), safety and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Pediatric Rheumatology – Clinical and Therapeutic Aspects I: Juvenile Arthritis

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose:  Treatment response, remission rates and compliance in polyarticular JIA patients treated with adalimumab(ADA), etanercept(ETA), or tocilizumab(TCZ) were analyzed in clinical practice.

Methods:  Data from the German BIKER registry were analyzed in all patients with polyarticular JIA who started treatment with ETA, ADA or TCZ from 2011-2015. Baseline patient characteristics, treatment response, safety and drug survival were compared.

Results: : In total 236 patients started ADA, 419 ETA and 74 TCZ, with several differences in baseline patient characteristics (table 1). The baseline JADAS10 scores (mean +/-SD) in the ADA/ETA/TCZ cohorts were 12.1+/-7.6, 13.8+/-7.1 and 15.1+/-7.4, respectively (ADA vs ETA p<0.004), and the CHAQ-disability index scores were 0.43 +/-0.58, 0.59 +/- 0.6 and 0.63+/-0.55 (ADA vs ETA p<0.001). Uveitis history was more frequent in the ADA cohort (OR 5.73; p<0.0001). PedACR30/50/70/90 criterion improvement after 3 months of treatment was achieved by 69%/60%/42%/24% in the ETA cohort, 68%/61%/44%/27% in the ADA cohort and 61%/51%/33%/ 25% in the TCZ cohort. At 12 months, JADAS minimal disease activity was achieved in 57.2%/68.6%/60.5% and JADAS remission in 30.3%/44.4%/21.1% patients in the ADA/ETA/TCZ cohorts, respectively. ETA was used as a first biologic for 374 patients, ADA for 122 patients and TCZ for 13 patients. There were no important differences in efficacy between first and second-line use of the biologics. A total of 60.4%/49.4%/31.1% patients discontinued ADA/ETA/TCZ, respectively (OR for ADA 1.73; p= 0.006; OR for TCZ 0.46; p=0.004). The drug survival rates did not differ significantly for patients on biologic monotherapy compared with combination therapy with methotrexate. Over 4 years of observation in the ETA/ADA/TCZ cohorts 996/386/103 adverse events, and 148/119/26 serious adverse events, were reported.

Conclusion: In clinical practice, ETA is most frequently used as first-line biologic. ADA/ETA/TCZ showed comparable efficacies toward polyarticular JIA. Remission was achieved more frequently with ETA and TOC than with ADA. Overall, tolerance was acceptable. Interestingly, compliance was highest with TCZ and lowest with ADA. Because the patient cohorts differed at baseline, these results are preliminary and demonstrate the need for well-controlled head-to-head studies for confirmation. Table 1 Patient characteristics and response

Etanercept

cohort

N=419

Adalimumab cohort

N=236

Statistical comparison#

Tocilizumab

cohort

N=74

Statistical comparison#

Female, n (%)

332 (79.2%)

192 (81.4%)

OR=1.1 (0.7-1.5); p=0.78

51 (68.8%)

OR=0.6 (0.4-0.9); p=0.027

Age at baseline,

mean+/- SD

10.49+/-4.36

11.8 +/-4.0

p<0.0001

13.9+/-3.6

p<0.0001

JIA Category, n (%)

RF+PA

37 (8.8%)

23 (9.7%)

n.s.

9 (12.2%)

n.s.

RF-PA

224 (53.5%)

128 (54.2%)

n.s.

47 (63.5%)

n.s.

ExOA

158 (37.7%)

85 (36.0%)

n.s.

18 (24.3%)

OR=0.58 (0.4-0.99); p=0.03

Uveitis before start of biologic, n (%)

23 (5.5%)

59 (25%)

OR=5.73 (3.4-6.0); p=0.0001

0

n.a.

Use as first biologic, n (%)

400 (95.5%)

122 (51.7%)

OR=0.08 (0.05-0.1); p<0.0001

15 (20.3%)

OR=0.02 (0.01-0.03); p<0.0001

Co-Med MTX, n (%)

309 (73.7)

127 (53.8)

OR=0.5 (0.4-0.7); p<0.0001

34 (45.9)

OR=0.4 (0.3-0.7); p=0.0004

JADAS10 [0-40], mean +/-SD

13.8+/-7.1

12.1+/-7.6

p= 0.004

15.1+/-7.4

n.s

Median (IQR)

13.6 (8.8-19.0)

11.7 (6.1-17.5)

14.8 (9.2-19.8)

JADAS10 MDA at month 12 (ITT-population), n (%)

68.6%

57.2%

OR=0.61 (0.4-0.95); p=0.03

60.5%

n.s.

JADAS10 remission at month 12 (ITT-population), n (%)

44.4%

30.3%

OR=0.55 (0.35-0.85)

p=0.007

21.1%

OR=0.33 (0.15-0.76)

p=0.007

# Compared with the ETA cohort, n.a. not applicable, n.s. not significant. Table 2: Rates and reasons for discontinuation

Reason for discontinuation

Etanercept

N=419

Adalimumab N=236 Odds ratio # (95% CI); p Tocilizumab N=74 Odds ratio # �(95% CI); p
Discontinuations N (%)

207 (49.4)

142 (60.4) 1.55 (1.12-2.14); 0.008 23 (31.1) 0.46 (0.27-0.78); 0.004
Inefficacy N (%)

50 (11.9)

52 (22.0) 2.03 (1.32-3.11); <0.001 9 (12.2) 1.01 (0.47-2.15); n.s.
Remission N (%)

54 (12.9)

22 (9.3) 0.69 (0.41-1.17); n.s. 2 (2.7) 0.19 (0.05-0.79); 0.01
Intolerance N (%)

15 (3.6)

15 (6.4) 1.83 (0.88-3.81); n.s. 2 (2.7) 0.75 (0.17.3.34); n.s.
Others* N (%)

88 (16.0)

53 (22.4) n.a. 10 (13.4) n.a.

* Others included patient/parent decision, # Compared with the ETA cohort n.a. not applicable; n.s. not significant


Disclosure: G. Horneff, AbbVie, Pfizer,Novartis and Roche, 2,AbbVie, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche, 8; A. Klein, None; K. Minden, Abbvie, Pfizer, Roche, 2,Abbvie, Pfizer, Genzyme, Pharm-Allergan, 9; H. I. Huppertz, None; F. Weller-Heinemann, None; J. B. Kuemmerle-Deschner, None; J. P. Haas, None; T. Hospach, Pfizer, Abbvie, Roche, 9,Pfizer, Abbvie, Roche, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Horneff G, Klein A, Minden K, Huppertz HI, Weller-Heinemann F, Kuemmerle-Deschner JB, Haas JP, Hospach T. Comparison of Treatment Response, Remission Rate and Drug Adherence in Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Patients Treated with Etanercept, Adalimumab or Tocilizumab [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-treatment-response-remission-rate-and-drug-adherence-in-polyarticular-juvenile-idiopathic-arthritis-patients-treated-with-etanercept-adalimumab-or-tocilizumab/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-treatment-response-remission-rate-and-drug-adherence-in-polyarticular-juvenile-idiopathic-arthritis-patients-treated-with-etanercept-adalimumab-or-tocilizumab/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology