ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 660

Comparison of the Four Validated Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Tools in Diagnosing Psoriatic Arthritis in Patients with Psoriasis [Compaq Study]

Aman Sharma1, Sushant Mishra2, Sunil Dogra3 and Harish Kancharla2, 1Internal Medicine (Rheumatology Unit), Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India, 2Department of Internal Medicine,, PGIMER,, Chandigarh, India, 3Department of Dermatology, PGIMER,, Chandigarh, India

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster I: Clinical Aspects and Assessments

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Although there are various Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) screening questionnaires, the most optimal screening instrument is not known. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity the four psoriatic arthritis screening tools (TOPAS II, PASE, PEST and EARP) in diagnosing Psoriatic Arthritis in patients with Psoriasis with CASPAR as gold standard.

Methods:

This was a non-interventional, cross sectional study in which 302 patients  diagnosed with PsO completed the Toronto Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Questionnaire (TOPAS II), Psoriatic Arthritis Screening And Evaluation (PASE), Psoriasis Epidemiology Screening Project (PEST) and Early Arthritis For Psoriasis Patients (EARP) prior to rheumatologic evaluation. The cutoff scores used in the original validation studies of these questionnaires were used to designate positive and negative cases.  Sensitivities and specificities of these questionnaires were determined by comparing the score with the diagnosis made by the CASPAR criteria.

Results:

Out of 302 patients with PsO, 45 had PsA according to CASPAR criteria (14.9%). 27 patients had a TOPAS II score of ≥8 suggestive of PsA. The mean TOPAS II score of the PsO patients was 2.93±2.6 and that of PsA patients was 6.84±1.9. 36 patients had a PEST questionnaire score of ≥3 suggestive of PsA. The mean PEST score of the PsO patients was 0.86±1.24, that of PsA patients was 2.73±1.45. For calculation of PASE score, 2 cutoffs were used separately. 50 patients had a PASE questionnaire score of ≥44 (recommended in a validation study of PASE) suggestive of PsA. 47 patients a PASE score 47(used in development of PASE questionnaire). 72 patients had EARP questionnaire score of ≥3 suggestive of PsA. The mean EARP score of the PsO patients was 1.44±2.33 and that of PsA patients was 5.47±2.25.The sensitivities and specificities of   EARP, PASE44, PASE47  PEST, and ToPAS II were 91.1%, 80%, 75.6%, 53.3%, 44.4%  and  87.9%,  94.6%, 94.9%, 95.3% 97.3% respectively.  

Conclusion: Out of the four screening questionnaires, EARP was most sensitivity while TOPAS II had least sensitivity. TOPASII had highest specificity while EARP had least specificity.


Disclosure: A. Sharma, None; S. Mishra, None; S. Dogra, None; H. Kancharla, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sharma A, Mishra S, Dogra S, Kancharla H. Comparison of the Four Validated Psoriatic Arthritis Screening Tools in Diagnosing Psoriatic Arthritis in Patients with Psoriasis [Compaq Study] [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-the-four-validated-psoriatic-arthritis-screening-tools-in-diagnosing-psoriatic-arthritis-in-patients-with-psoriasis-compaq-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-the-four-validated-psoriatic-arthritis-screening-tools-in-diagnosing-psoriatic-arthritis-in-patients-with-psoriasis-compaq-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology