ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2639

Comparison of Patient Self-reported Data to Physician-driven Cohorts in Patients with Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis

Irena Doubelt1, Jason Springer 2, Tanaz Kermani 3, Antoine Sreih 4, Cristina Burroughs 5, David Cuthbertson 5, Simon Carette 1, Nader A. Khalidi 6, Curry L. Koening 7, Carol Langford 8, Carol A. McAlear 9, Larry W. Moreland 10, Paul Monach 11, Dianne Shaw 12, Philip Seo 13, Ulrich Specks 14, Kalen Young 15, Steven Ytterberg 14, Peter A. Merkel 16, Christian Pagnoux 1 and VCRC Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium 17, 1Mount Sinai Hospital and University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada, 2Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas, MO, 3University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 4University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 5University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 6McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 7University of Utah Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, 8Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 9University of Pennsylvania - VCRC Project Manager, Philadelphia, PA, 10University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 11Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 12Vasculitis Foundation, North Carolina, 13Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 14Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, 15Vasculitis Foundation, Kansas City, MO, 16Univeristy of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 17University of Pennsylvania, Division of Rheumatology, philadelphia

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Churg-Strauss syndrome, online patient engagement, patient questionnaires and vasculitis, patient-reported outcome measures

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: Vasculitis – ANCA-Associated Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Aligning perspectives of patients and physicians in the diagnosis and management of diseases is imperative, particularly in rare, chronic diseases such as vasculitis. We sought to compare patient-reported vs. physician-reported clinical manifestations, treatments, and outcomes in patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA).

Methods: Retrospective, comparative analysis of patients ≥18 years old with EGPA from Canada or the United States, from two separate databases: 1) Vasculitis Patient-Powered Research Network (VPPRN), a self-enrolled, secure patient portal with patient-entered data updated quarterly from 2013-2019, and 2) Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium (VCRC) Longitudinal (LS) or the One-Time DNA (OT) studies, a combined physician-entered database (2003-2019). A few patients are in both databases, which are not presently linked due to protected health information policies. For validation of the diagnosis, patients in the VPPRN were excluded if they indicated that the diagnosis was not made by doctor and/or if they never used systemic glucocorticoids. Patients in the VCRC fulfilled the modified American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria. Studied parameters included demographics, clinical manifestations, ANCA status, treatments received since diagnosis, and relapses.

Results: 208 patients self-registered with a diagnosis of EGPA in the VPPRN (195 had a validated diagnosis) and 354 patients were enrolled in the VCRC. 135 (69.2%) of the 195 VPPRN patients were female; 176 (92.1%) were white, 4 (2%) Asian, and 1 (0.5%) Black or African American. Mean age at first disease symptoms and diagnosis were 41.9 (SD ±14.9) years and 47.3 (±14.3) years, respectively. Method of diagnosis reported by patients was based on symptoms (91.3%), laboratory testing (80.5%), biopsy results (50.3%), and imaging (50.3%). At enrollment, 80 (41%) reported that the EGPA was active. Table 1 shows the main characteristics and outcomes of the VPPRN patients compared to those from the VCRC. Patients in the VPPRN were predominantly female, slightly younger at diagnosis than in the VCRC cohort, and reported more frequent disease manifestations in almost all organ systems, but less lung disease, and similar frequencies of asthma, cardiac and gastrointestinal manifestations. With a mean follow-up of 2.2 (±1.1) years post-enrollment, 63 (32.3%) of the VPPRN patients reported at least 1 relapse post-enrollment, which was comparable to the VCRC patients.

Conclusion: This analysis comparing patient vs. physician data in EGPA showed some differences with patients generally reporting more manifestations of disease. These differences suggest that patient self-reported data can provide additional useful information. How to best combine patient-reported and physician-reported data for research studies in vasculitis warrants additional study.


tab1

Main characteristics of patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis from the Vasculitis Patient-Powered Research Network and the Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium


Disclosure: I. Doubelt, None; J. Springer, InflaRx, 9; T. Kermani, None; A. Sreih, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, 3, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3; C. Burroughs, None; D. Cuthbertson, None; S. Carette, None; N. Khalidi, None; C. Koening, None; C. Langford, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, GlaxoSmithKline,, 2, ChemoCentryx, 2, Genentech, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, 9, Abbvie, 9, AstraZeneca, 9; C. McAlear, None; L. Moreland, None; P. Monach, None; D. Shaw, None; P. Seo, None; U. Specks, None; K. Young, None; S. Ytterberg, None; P. Merkel, AbbVie, 5, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Biogen, 5, Boeringher-Ingelheim, 2, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Celgene, 2, 5, ChemoCentryx, 2, 5, CSL Behring, 5, Genentech/Roche, 2, 5, Genzyme/Sanofi, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, InflaRx, 5, Insmed, 5, Jannsen, 5, Kiniksa, 5, Kypha, 2, TerumoBCT, 2, UpToDate, 7; C. Pagnoux, ChemoCentryx, 5, Chemocentryx, 5, Genetech/Roche, 5, Genzyme/Sanofi, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Hoffman-La Roche, 2, 5, 8, Hoffman-LaRoche, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5; V. Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Doubelt I, Springer J, Kermani T, Sreih A, Burroughs C, Cuthbertson D, Carette S, Khalidi N, Koening C, Langford C, McAlear C, Moreland L, Monach P, Shaw D, Seo P, Specks U, Young K, Ytterberg S, Merkel P, Pagnoux C, Vasculitis Clinical Research Consortium V. Comparison of Patient Self-reported Data to Physician-driven Cohorts in Patients with Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-patient-self-reported-data-to-physician-driven-cohorts-in-patients-with-eosinophilic-granulomatosis-with-polyangiitis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-patient-self-reported-data-to-physician-driven-cohorts-in-patients-with-eosinophilic-granulomatosis-with-polyangiitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology