ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2953

Comparison of Patient Outcomes in Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System and Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome

Elisabeth Ray1, Didem Saygin1, Seby John2, William Messner3, Ken Uchino4, Leonard H. Calabrese5 and Rula A Hajj-Ali6, 1Rheumatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 2Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 3Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 4Cerebrovascular Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, 5Rheumatic & Immunologic Disease, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 6Rheumatic and Immunologic Dis, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: angiitis, CNS Vasculitis, outcomes and reversible cerebrovascular vasoconstriction

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2016

Title: Vasculitis - Poster III: Rarer Vasculitides

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome (RCVS) is an important mimic of Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System (PACNS). Distinct clinical and diagnostic features differentiate both entities. However no available data exist in comparing the long term outcome of these two patient populations. The aim of this study is to compare the long term outcomes of PACNS and RCVS.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study from a tertiary referral center. Eligible patient records were identified via retrospective chart review using the ICD-9 code for cerebral angiitis and reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome, and the diagnoses were further agreed upon by 2 rheumatologists in the department who have particular expertise in these diseases. Self-reported questionnaires were prospectively collected from eligible subjects. Measure of disability was assessed by the Barthel Index (BI), quality of life was assessed by EuroQOL (EQ-5D-5L), and depression was assessed with Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9).

Results: Of the 191 patients with RCVS, 45 responded to the questionnaires (23.5%). Of the 78 patients with PACNS, 27 responded to the questionnaires (34.6%). Median follow-up (from diagnosis to date of questionnaires) of those who responded with PACNS was 66 months (+/- 54 months) and with RCVS was 78 months (4-254 months). RCVS patients had significantly better functional capacity than PACNS as measured by Barthel Index (mean 95.9 in RCVS, 79.4 in PACNS, p = 0.022). RCVS patients scored significantly better in the self-care subscale of EuroQOL, although the remainder of the quality of life measures (mobility, usual activities, and anxiety/depression) were not statistically significant. Most patients with RCVS and PACNS scored low (minimal depression) on PHQ-9, and the mean PHQ-9 score between both groups was not statistically different (p = 0.683).

Conclusion: In a comparison of outcomes of patients with PACNS and RCVS, patients with RCVS were found to have better outcomes in terms of functional capabilities, and may have better quality of life. However, they appear to have a similar rate of depression.


Disclosure: E. Ray, None; D. Saygin, None; S. John, None; W. Messner, None; K. Uchino, None; L. H. Calabrese, None; R. A. Hajj-Ali, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ray E, Saygin D, John S, Messner W, Uchino K, Calabrese LH, Hajj-Ali RA. Comparison of Patient Outcomes in Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System and Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-patient-outcomes-in-primary-angiitis-of-the-central-nervous-system-and-reversible-cerebral-vasoconstriction-syndrome/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-patient-outcomes-in-primary-angiitis-of-the-central-nervous-system-and-reversible-cerebral-vasoconstriction-syndrome/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology