ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 667

Comparison of Patient and Provider Assessments of Response to Therapy for Psoriatic Arthritis

Tobee Gunter1 and Jessica Walsh2, 1Rheumatology, School of Medicine, University of Utah Internal Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, 2Division of Rheumatology, Salt Lake City Veteran Affairs and University of Utah Medical Centers, Salt Lake City, UT

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment Poster I: Clinical Aspects and Assessments

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Little is known about how psoriatic arthritis patients and their providers perceive response to therapy.  Discrepancies in perceptions of therapy response may indicate that providers are not adequately measuring the aspects of disease that are meaningful to patients.  Insufficient assessments of disease states may lead to non-ideal therapies and may contribute to patient non-compliance.

 Methods:

Comparisons of patient and provider assessments of response to therapy formulate possible discrepancies. Of the 109 patients enrolled in the Psoriatic Arthritis Research Consortium (PARC) during August 2014 to June 2015, 64 patients rated their response(s) to therapy. Participants and their providers rated response to therapy on a 4-point scale (Very well, Moderately well, A little, Not at All).  Participant response ratings were categorized as concordant if their rating was the same as the provider.   Discordant participant responses were categorized as either less favorable or more favorable than the provider’s rating.  Participant and disease characteristics were compared between participants with discordant and concordant ratings. These characteristics included age, gender, alcohol use, current smoker(s), Body Mass Index, education, disability, IBP, radiographic changes, and psoriatic fingernails. 

Table 1.  Baseline demographics, PsA characteristics, and therapies

n=64

No. (%) or Mean (SD)

Age

53.0 (14.1)

Female gender

35 (54.7%)

White race

60 (93.8%)

Ethnicity (hispanic/latino)

2 (3.1%)

Body Mass Index

29.3 (7.5)

Psoriatic arthritis duration from onset (years)

13.7 (13.5)

Psoriatic arthritis duration from diagnosis (years)

6.6 (8.8)

Synovitis documented by physician

57 (89.1%)

Dactylitis documented by physician

12 (18.8%)

Enthesitis documented by physician

35 (54.7%)

Inflammatory back pain

20 (31.3%)

Tender joint count (0-68)

4.7 (8.2)

Swollen joint count (0-66)

1.6 (3.1)

Classification Criteria for PsA diagnosis

49 (76.6%)

PGAxBSA

1.8 (4.7)

Peripheral radiographic changes consistent with PsA

28 (43.8%)

Axial radiographic changes consistent with PsA

10 (15.6%)

Biologic and non-biologic DMARDs, current

52 (81.3%)

Biologic and non-biologic DMARDs, past

10 (15.6%)

PGAxBSA = psoriasis Physician Global Assessment x Body Surface Area

Results: Forty percent of response ratings were concordant between participants and providers, while 29. 3% of participant ratings were less favorable than the provider ratings and 30.5% were more favorable. 

Table 2.  Comparisons of patient and provider ratings        
Discordant ratings
Concordant ratings (reference) Less Favorable ratings More Favorable ratings
n=18 n=13 p value or % change n=17 p value or %  change
Education (yrs) 16.2 (2.9) 14.8 (2.9) 0.19 14.4 (2.5) 0.06
Age 55.9 (15.5) 49.1 (15.6) 0.24 49.7 (11.0) 0.19
Body Mass Index 30 (6.8) 29.7 (8.2) 0.93 28.5 (7.2) 0.53
Psoriatic fingernails  4 (22.2%) 7 (53.9%) 31.7% 10 (58.8%) 36.6%
Inflammatory Back Pain 6 (33.3%) 3 (23.1%) 10.2% 4 (23.5%) 9.8%
Peripheral radiographic changes  7 (38.9%) 6 (46.2%) 7.3% 8 (47.1)% 8.2%
Axial radiographic changes 1 (5.6%) 2 (15.4%) 9.8% 4 (23.5%) 17.9%
Female 9 (50.0%) 9 (69.2%) 19.2% 9 (53%) 3.0%
Alcohol Use 9 (50.0%) 4 (30.8%) 19.2% 4 (23.5%) 26.5%
Current Smokers 0 (0.0%) 1 (7.7%) 7.7% 1 (5.9%) 5.9%
Disabled 1 (5.6%) 2 (15.4%) 9.8% 2 (11.8%) 6.2%
Not working because of PsA 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0% 3 (17.7%) 17.7%
n=number of patients evaluated with rating

Conclusion:

Participants and providers rated response to therapy identically 40.2% of the time.  Discordant response ratings were similarly distributed in the less favorable and more favorable categories. No differences in participant or disease characteristic were identified when discordant ratings were compared to concordant ratings.


Disclosure: T. Gunter, None; J. Walsh, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Gunter T, Walsh J. Comparison of Patient and Provider Assessments of Response to Therapy for Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-patient-and-provider-assessments-of-response-to-therapy-for-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-patient-and-provider-assessments-of-response-to-therapy-for-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology