ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1827

Comparison of Ixekizumab and Ustekinumab Efficacy in the Treatment of Nail Lesions of Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: 24-Week Data from a Phase 3 Trial

Pierre-Dominique Ghislain1, Curdin Conrad2, Yves Dutronc3, Carsten Henneges3, David Sandoval Calderon3, Myriam Vincent3, Liesbet Ghys3, Jolien de Gruijter3 and Peter C M van de Kerkhof4, 1Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium, 2Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland, 3Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 4Department of Dermatology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Biologics, clinical trials, psoriasis and skin

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 6, 2017

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Aspects and Treatment II

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Nails are frequently involved in psoriasis and represent one of the most difficult to treat manifestations of the disease. This study evaluated the comparative efficacy of ixekizumab (IXE) and ustekinumab (UST) in the treatment of nail lesions during a head-to-head trial, IXORA-S.

Methods: In this Phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, parallel-group trial (IXORA-S, NCT02561806), patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were randomized (1:1) to receive either IXE (160-mg starting dose, then 80 mg every 2 weeks for 12 weeks followed by 80 mg every 4 weeks; N=136) or UST (45 mg/90 mg weight-based dosing at Weeks 0, 4 and every 12 weeks thereafter per label; N=166). The primary endpoint was to determine if IXE was superior to UST, as measured by the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) after 12 weeks of treatment. Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) was used to assess fingernail psoriasis for all patients presenting with nail involvement at baseline (NAPSI>0), and these patients were included in the present analysis. Each fingernail was scored for bed and matrix psoriasis, then scores were added to obtain total NAPSI fingernail scores ranging from 0 (no nail psoriasis) to 80 (severe nail psoriasis). Categorical data were assessed using logistic regression with weight and geographic region as factors at Weeks 12 and 24 and Fisher’s exact test at other time points. Missing data were imputed using non-responder imputation. Least squares (LS) means (95% CI) were calculated for NAPSI and treatment groups compared using covariance analysis with weight, geographic region, and baseline NAPSI score as factors.

Results: At week 12, a significantly higher proportion of patients treated with IXE achieved PASI 90 relative to UST (72.8% [n=99] vs 42.2% [n=70], p<0.001, respectively), thereby achieving the primary endpoint of IXORA-S.1 At baseline, 84 IXE-treated (61.8%) and 105 UST-treated (63.3%) patients in IXORA-S had nail psoriasis. Mean NAPSI score at baseline was 28.3 (standard deviation [SD]: 19.9) for IXE-treated and 24.6 (SD: 20.1) for UST-treated patients. Statistically significant differences in percentage of patients achieving NAPSI=0 were first seen at Week 16, with 26 (31.0%) IXE-treated patients and 18 (17.1%) UST-treated patients reaching complete resolution of nail psoriasis (p=0.037). At Week 24, LS mean change from baseline NAPSI was -19.9 (-22.3, -17.5) and -13.2 (-15.4, -11.0) for patients treated with IXE and UST, respectively (p<0.001), and 41 (48.8%) patients treated with IXE achieved NAPSI=0 compared to 24 (22.9%) patients treated with UST (p=0.012).

Conclusion: Complete resolution of nail psoriasis was seen in significantly greater percentages of patients treated with IXE compared to UST at Week 24, even though improvement was observed in both groups over 24 weeks. Twenty-four weeks may be too early for full evaluation of nail psoriasis, and continued improvement can be expected through one year.

  1. Reich et al. 2017 Comparison of ixekizumab with ustekinumab in moderate-to-severe psoriasis: 24-week results from IXORA-S, a Phase 3 study. Br J Dermatol. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15666

Disclosure: P. D. Ghislain, Schering-Plough, Abbot/Abbvie, Janssen-Cilag, Leo, Novartis, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Wyeth/Pfizer, 5,Wyeth/Pfizer, Schering-Plough, Abbot/Abbvie, Janssen-Cilag, Leo, Galderma, BMS, 8,Wyeth/Pfizer, Schering-Plough, Abbot/Abbvie, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Galderma, 9,Wyeth/Pfizer, Schering-Plough, Abbot/Abbvie, Janssen-Cilag, 2; C. Conrad, None; Y. Dutronc, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; C. Henneges, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; D. S. Calderon, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; M. Vincent, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; L. Ghys, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; J. de Gruijter, Eli Lilly and Company, 1,Eli Lilly and Company, 3; P. C. M. van de Kerkhof, Celgene, Centocor, Allmiral, Amgen, Pfizer, Philips, Abbott, Eli Lilly and Company, Galderma, Novartis, Jansen, Cilag, Leo Pharma, Sandoz, Mitsibishu, Sandoz, 5,Basilea, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company, Amgen, Abbvie, Philips Lighting, Jansen Cilag, Leo Pharma, 9.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ghislain PD, Conrad C, Dutronc Y, Henneges C, Calderon DS, Vincent M, Ghys L, de Gruijter J, van de Kerkhof PCM. Comparison of Ixekizumab and Ustekinumab Efficacy in the Treatment of Nail Lesions of Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: 24-Week Data from a Phase 3 Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-ixekizumab-and-ustekinumab-efficacy-in-the-treatment-of-nail-lesions-of-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-plaque-psoriasis-24-week-data-from-a-phase-3-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-ixekizumab-and-ustekinumab-efficacy-in-the-treatment-of-nail-lesions-of-patients-with-moderate-to-severe-plaque-psoriasis-24-week-data-from-a-phase-3-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology