ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2142

Comparison of Interferon-y Release Assay Versus Tuberculin Skin Test in the Golimumab UC and the Golimumab SC Rheumatology (RA, PsA, and AS) Clinical Study Programs

Elizabeth C. Hsia1,2, Neil Schluger3, John J. Cush4, Eric L. Matteson5, Stephen Xu1, William Sandborn6, Paul Rutgeerts7 and Colleen Marano1, 1Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 2University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 3Columbia U College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, NY, 4Baylor Research Institute, Dallas, TX, 5Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 6Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, La Jolla, CA, 7University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tuberculosis, Ulcerative Colitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis-Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy IV: Safety of Targeted Therapies

Session Type: ACR Concurrent Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:30PM-6:00PM

Background/Purpose:  
Interferon-ƴ
release assays (IGRAs) offer the possibility of an improved method to detect TB
infections in pts with autoimmune disorders.  Compare results of an IGRA vs standard
TST as a screening tool for latent TB infection (LTBI) in the Golimumab [GLM] PURSUIT
Ulcerative Colitis (UC) program versus GLM SC Rheumatology (RA, PsA, AS) program1.

Methods: In both programs, pts were screened
for LTBI using standard TST and IGRA to assess eligibility in the following studies:
PURSUIT-SC and PURSUIT-IV; GO-BEFORE, GO-FORWARD, GO-AFTER, GO-REVEAL, and
GO-RAISE, resp. Any pt with a newly identified positive finding for TB in whom
there was no evidence of active TB was permitted to enter provided appropriate
treatment for LTBI was initiated before or at the time of first dose of drug. TST
was performed by the Mantoux method, using 5TUs of PPD standard or 2TU of PPD
RT-23. TST was deemed positive for LTBI according to local country guidelines
for an immunosuppressed host or, in the absence of local guidelines, according
to an induration ≥5mm. The IGRA used to screen for LTBI was
QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube test. Overall IGRA and TST results were assessed.  Prior
BCG vaccination and con meds(ie corticosteroids and/or immunomodulators) on
outcome was also assessed.

Results:
 
In GLM PURSUIT,
1283 pts and in GLM Rheumatology 2282 pts had both IGRA and TST screening prior
to GLM treatment.  Both programs were global; differences were PURSUIT included
S. Africa and the Rheum program included Asia.  In the PURSUIT and Rheum
programs, agreement between the TST and IGRA results, measured by the kappa
coefficient, was 0.135 (95% CI, 0.050-0.220; p=0.028) and 0.22 (95% CI,
0.157-0.279; p=0.021), resp.  Overall, in PURSUIT, 501(39.0%) of 1283 pts had
previously received BCG vaccine; among this vaccinated group, the rate of
positivity for LTBI by TST was 10.4%  vs 5.0% for IGRA positivity.  In the
Rheum program, 781 (34.2%) of 2282 pts had previously received BCG vaccine;
within this vaccinated group, the rate of positivity for LTBI by TST was 15.2%
vs 9.1% for IGRA positivity.  PURSUIT pts who had not received the BCG vaccine,
the rate of positivity by TST was 1.9% vs 2.8 % for IGRA positivity compared
with 5.0% vs 5.8%, resp, in the Rheum program. When IGRA was repeated in PURSUIT
pts whose results were initially indeterminate, the majority of pts(67.0%) were
IGRA negative on repeat whereas the number of pts whose results were positive
was 5.3%; IGRA remained indeterminate for 27.7%. Similar results were seen in
the Rheum program (74% IGRA negative, 2.7% positive, and 23.2% remained
indeterminate).  Concomitant corticosteroid and/or immunomodulator use did not
appear to have an impact on results.

Conclusion:   Results of this comparison
suggest IGRA provides greater specificity and possibly greater sensitivity than
TST, and performs similarly in UC and Rheum populations.  

Results from the GLM PURSUIT UC and GLM Rheumatology Programs

Screening test results

PURSUIT UC

Rheumatology SC Program

IGRA/TST

 

 

IGRA +

48/1283 (3.7%)

160/2282 (7.0%)

     TST +

15/48 (31.3%)

59/160 (36.9%)

     TST –

33/48 (68.8%)

101/160 (63.1%)

IGRA –

1201/1283 (93.6%)

2081/2282 (91.2%)

     TST +

62/1201 (5.2%)

150/2081 (7.2%)

     TST –

1139/1201 (94.8%)

1931/2081 (92.8%)

IGRA Indeterminate

34/1283 (2.7%)

41/2282 (1.8%)

     TST +

2/34 (5.9%)

6/41 (14.6%)

     TST –

32/34 (94.1%)

35/41 (85.4%)

Overall

 

 

  Positive by TST only

79/1283 (6.2%)

215/2282 (9.4%)

Positive by IGRA only

48/1283 (3.7%)

160/2282 (7.0%)

Positive by both TST and IGRA

15/1283 (1.2%)

59/2282 (2.6%)

Positive by either TST or IGRA

112/1283 (8.7%)

316/2282 (13.8%)

1Hsia EC et al. A & R Vol. 64,
No 7, July 2012 pp 2068-2077 


Disclosure: E. C. Hsia, Janssen R & D, LLC, 3; N. Schluger, Janssen R & D, LLC, 2; J. J. Cush, Janssen R & D, LLC, 2; E. L. Matteson, Janssen R & D, LLC, 2; S. Xu, Janssen R & D, LLC, 3; W. Sandborn, Janssen R & D, LLC, 2; P. Rutgeerts, Janssen R & D, LLC, 2; C. Marano, Janssen R & D, LLC, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hsia EC, Schluger N, Cush JJ, Matteson EL, Xu S, Sandborn W, Rutgeerts P, Marano C. Comparison of Interferon-y Release Assay Versus Tuberculin Skin Test in the Golimumab UC and the Golimumab SC Rheumatology (RA, PsA, and AS) Clinical Study Programs [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-interferon-y-release-assay-versus-tuberculin-skin-test-in-the-golimumab-uc-and-the-golimumab-sc-rheumatology-ra-psa-and-as-clinical-study-programs/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-interferon-y-release-assay-versus-tuberculin-skin-test-in-the-golimumab-uc-and-the-golimumab-sc-rheumatology-ra-psa-and-as-clinical-study-programs/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology