ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1544

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Belimumab and Telitacicept in the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

wanling wei, ling lei, Cheng Zhao, hanyou mo, zhanrui chen, leting zheng, jing wen, Fang Qin, xiaoling liao, wen zeng and fei dong, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, nanning, China (People's Republic)

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: Biologicals, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Therapy, complementary

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 17, 2024

Title: SLE – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: B cells play an important role in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE).Multiple biological agents with B lymphocyte as the therapeutic target have recently emerged as potential novel treatments for SLE. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of B lymphocyte stimulation inhibitor ,belimumab and telitacicept, in the treatment of SLE under standard treatment in real-world clinical practice.

Methods: SLE patients treated with belimumab or telitacicept at the Rheumatology and Immunology Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from April 1, 2020 to December 31, 2023 were collected. The primary outcomes were changes in SLEDAI-2K and PGA scores and were observed at week 4, 12 and 24 after treatment. Secondary outcomes included urinary protein(Upro), random urine protein-to-creatinine ratio(Upro/Ucr),albumin, creatinine,complement C3 and C4, anti-dsDNA and adverse events(AEs).

Results: There were a total of 195 patients, including 134 in belimumab group, with an average age of 30.54±12.50 years,disease duration 52.44±68.01 months,126 (94.0%) were female.61 in telitacicept group with an average age of 28.34±8.67 years,disease duration 57.76±56.84 months,55 (90.2%) were female.After treatment, the level of anti-dsDNA and complement C3 in belimumab group decreased more obviously than that in telitacicept group, and the decrease of anti-dsDNA at week 24, increase of complement C3 at week 12 and week 24 were statistically significant between two groups. There was no statistical difference in the improvement of Upro,Upro/Ucr,complement C4 between two groups after treatment.The overall AE rates were 58.6% and 75.4% in the belimumab group and telitacicept group, respectively,including infection (25.7% vs 39.4%). One death due to cerebral hemorrhage,two severe pneumonia and one depression in belimumab group.More upper respiratory tract infections and viral infections in telitacicept group.

Conclusion: Belimumab or telitacicept combined with standard treatment significantly improved disease activity in SLE patients but with no difference in efficacy.The incidence of infection with belimumab is relatively low, and the upper respiratory tract infection of telitacicept is more common.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: w. wei: None; l. lei: None; C. Zhao: None; h. mo: None; z. chen: None; l. zheng: None; j. wen: None; F. Qin: None; x. liao: None; w. zeng: None; f. dong: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

wei w, lei l, Zhao C, mo h, chen z, zheng l, wen j, Qin F, liao x, zeng w, dong f. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Belimumab and Telitacicept in the Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-efficacy-and-safety-between-belimumab-and-telitacicept-in-the-treatment-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-efficacy-and-safety-between-belimumab-and-telitacicept-in-the-treatment-of-systemic-lupus-erythematosus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology