ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 551

Comparison of Drug Tolerability and Discontinuation Reasons between 7 Biologics in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis -Results from Kansai Consortium for Well-Being of Rheumatic Disease Patients (ANSWER cohort)-

Kosuke Ebina1, Makoto Hirao2, Motomu Hashimoto3, Moritoshi Furu4, Wataru Yamamoto5, Ryota Hara6, Takanori Fujimura6, Toru Hirano7, Shuzo Yoshida8, Koji Nagai8, Hideki Amuro9, Yonsu Son9, Akira Onishi10, Kengo Akashi11, Masaki Katayama12, Keiichi Yamamoto13 and Hideki Yoshikawa14, 1Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan, 2Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka University, Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan, 3Department of Advanced Medicine for Rheumatic Diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, 4Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, 5Kurashiki Sweet Hospital, Okayama, Japan, 6The Center for Rheumatic Diseases, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan, 7Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Rheumatic Diseases, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan, 8Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan, 9Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan, 10Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan, 11Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immnology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan, 12Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Osaka, Japan, 13Osaka City University, Osaka, Japan, 14Department of Orthopedics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita Osaka, Japan

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Biologic agents and rheumatoid arthritis, treatment

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy Poster I: Comorbidities and Adverse Events; Efficacy and Safety of Small Molecules

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  More than 4 years have passed since 7 biologics became available for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japan, still lack reliable evidence in their differences of tolerability and discontinuation reasons.

Methods:  A total of 1,037 biologics treatment courses of RA from 2009 to 2016 [female 81.8%, baseline age 59.6 y, disease duration 7.8y, bio continued duration 17.1 months, RF positivity 81.5%, ACPA positivity 86.7%, DAS28-ESR 4.4, CDAI 16.8, HAQ 1.1, Bio naïve 57.1% and switched 42.9%, methotrexate (MTX) 5.9 mg/week (limited to 16mg/week in Japan) (68.6%), prednisolone (PSL) 2.5 mg/day (43.5%), abatacept (ABT) 21.3%, tocilizumab (TCZ) 20.7%, golimumab (GLM) 16.9%, etanercept (ETN) 13.6%, adalimumab (ADA) 11.1%, infliximab (IFX) 8.5%, certolizumab pegol (CZP) 7.9%] were included in this 7-center, retrospective study. The drug tolerability and discontinuation reasons at 36 months were estimated using Kaplan-Meier method, and adjusted by potent confounders [Sex / Age / Bio started date / Disease duration / ACPA positivity / RF positivity / bio naive or switched / combined csDMARDs (MTX, tacrolimus, bucillamine, salazosulfapyridine, iguratimod) and PSL / baseline DAS28-ESR / HAQ] which may affect biologics retention rates using a Cox proportional hazards model.

Results:  There were no significant differences in the baseline disease activity (DAS28-ESR and CDAI). The major causes of 7 biologics treatment discontinuation were as follows. Drug inefficacy (47.7%), other nontoxic reasons (12.3%), remission (8.6%), infection (7.5%), patients’ preference (7.5%), other adverse events such as malignant, cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, hematologic complications (6.2%), skin or systemic reaction (5.3%), and changing hospital (5.1%). Adjusted discontinuation reasons and ratio at 36 months in each drug were as follows. Drug inefficacy (TCZ 16.1%, ABT 23.7%, ETN 28.4%, CZP 32.9%, IFX 33.3%, ADA 42.3%, and GLM 46.1%; P=0.14), remission (IFX 11.4%, ADA 2.6%, ETN 1.4%, ABT 0.5%, TCZ 0.5%, GLM 0.0%, and CZP 0.0%; P<0.001), infection (ABT 1.4%, TCZ 1.5%, GLM 2.0%, ETN 2.3%, ADA 2.5%, IFX 4.0%, and CZP 5.5%; P=0.77), other adverse events (ABT 1.2%, ETN 2.0%, CZP 4.9%, GLM 5.6%, ADA 7.2%, TCZ 8.5%, and IFX 11.7%; P=0.03), and skin or systemic reaction (ABT 0.0%, TCZ 0.5%, GLM 1.1%, ADA 1.7%, ETN 2.1%, CZP 3.7%, and IFX 4.5%; P=0.02), respectively. Adjusted total retention rates at 36 months were as follows. TCZ 58.9%, ABT 55.1%, CZP 51.4%, ETN 50.2%, GLM 37.6%, ADA 32.7%, and IFX 21.7% (P=0.006).

Conclusion:  When adjusted by potent confounders, TCZ showed lowest inefficacy and highest retention rate, ABT showed lowest infection, skin or systemic reaction, or other toxic adverse events rate, and IFX showed highest remission discontinuation rate at 36 months compared to other biologics in RA.


Disclosure: K. Ebina, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Ono Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, UCB Japan, 8; M. Hirao, None; M. Hashimoto, Astellas Pharma, 2,Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Chugai, Ayumi, UCB, Bristol-Meyers, 5; M. Furu, None; W. Yamamoto, None; R. Hara, None; T. Fujimura, None; T. Hirano, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. AbbVie, Ono Pharmaceutical, Astellas Pharma Inc., 5; S. Yoshida, None; K. Nagai, None; H. Amuro, None; Y. Son, None; A. Onishi, None; K. Akashi, None; M. Katayama, None; K. Yamamoto, None; H. Yoshikawa, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Ono Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Phizer, Astellas Pharma, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Ebina K, Hirao M, Hashimoto M, Furu M, Yamamoto W, Hara R, Fujimura T, Hirano T, Yoshida S, Nagai K, Amuro H, Son Y, Onishi A, Akashi K, Katayama M, Yamamoto K, Yoshikawa H. Comparison of Drug Tolerability and Discontinuation Reasons between 7 Biologics in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis -Results from Kansai Consortium for Well-Being of Rheumatic Disease Patients (ANSWER cohort)- [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-drug-tolerability-and-discontinuation-reasons-between-7-biologics-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-results-from-kansai-consortium-for-well-being-of-rheumatic-disease-patients-answ/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-drug-tolerability-and-discontinuation-reasons-between-7-biologics-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-results-from-kansai-consortium-for-well-being-of-rheumatic-disease-patients-answ/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology