ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 495

Comparison of Discontinuation Rates by Biologic Since 1998 in US Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Sofia Ramiro1, Frederick Wolfe2, David J. Harrison3, George Joseph3, David H. Collier3, Désirée van der Heijde4, Robert Landewé5 and Kaleb Michaud6, 1Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands and Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal, 2National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, KS, 3Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 4Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 5Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam and Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, Netherlands, 6Rheumatology, National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases & University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: biologic response modifiers, outcome measures and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Since discontinuation may be a surrogate for ineffectiveness, we measured rates and reasons for biologic discontinuation in a real-world setting.

Methods: From 1998 to 2011, all medication use was measured every 6 months via questionnaire in a US-wide longitudinal study of RA patients. We limited our analysis to patients with a baseline observation immediately before initiating their first (1st) or second different (2nd) biologic and at least one observation after initiation. Patients reported their primary reason for discontinuation. Time-on-drug survival analyses were conducted for individual biologics and groups and annual rates reported. Survival of anti-TNFs and non-anti-TNFs was compared, in crude and adjusted in propensity score analyses.

Results: A total of 2,340 RA patients initiated their 1st biologic; 1,148 (49%) discontinued and 1,128 initiated their 2nd; 567 (50%) discontinued. The vast majority initiated one of the following: etanercept (1st 44%, 28% 2nd), infliximab (1st 37%, 38% 2nd), and adalimumab (1st 13%, 19% 2nd). The annual discontinuation rate of all 1st biologics was 18% (95% CI 17-19%) and 2nd was 21% (19-23%). Annual discontinuation rates for 1st and 2nd by drug was 15% (14-16%) and 16% (14-19%) for etanercept; 19% (17-21%) and 18% (16-20%) for infliximab; and 20% (17-23%) and 26% (22-32%) for adalimumab. Anakinra had the highest annual rates, 1st 59% (44-78%) and 2nd 106% (74-151%). Patients who started a biologic after 2005 had higher annual discontinuation rates, 1st 25% (22-29%) and 2nd 31% (27-35%). Anti-TNF had lower annual discontinuation rates vs non-anti-TNF (1st); crude HR 0.48 (0.34-0.69) and after propensity score adjustment, HR of 0.60 (0.40-0.90). For 2nd line, a crude HR of 0.64 (0.48-0.84) and adjusted HR of 0.81 (0.59-1.11) (see Figures). Reporting a side effect had the highest discontinuation rate, 1st 63% and 2nd =81%, followed by reporting the drug was “not working”, 1st 49% and 2nd 60%.

Conclusion: In this large cohort, RA patients tend to remain on their initial and second biologic for relatively long periods suggesting the drugs’ effectiveness. Discontinuation rates were higher for non-anti-TNFs and in patients who initiated a biologic more recently when more treatment options were available. Contrary to recent findings, there was no statistically significant difference in discontinuation rates of anti-TNFs and non-anti TNFs as second biologic treatment.  

 


Disclosure:

S. Ramiro,
None;

F. Wolfe,
None;

D. J. Harrison,

Amgen,

1,

Amgen,

3;

G. Joseph,

Amgen Inc.,

1,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

D. H. Collier,

Amgen Inc.,

1,

Amgen Inc.,

3;

D. van der Heijde,

Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Centocor, Chugai, Eli-Lilly, GSK, Merck, Novartis, Otsuka, Pfizer Inc., Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Schering-Plough, UCB, Wyeth,

5,

Imaging Rheumatology,

4;

R. Landewé,

Rheumatology Consultancy BV ,

4,

Abbott, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Centocor, GSK, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Schering-Plough, UCB, Wyeth,

5;

K. Michaud,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-discontinuation-rates-by-biologic-since-1998-in-us-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology