ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2649

Comparison of Biopsy Proven Giant Cell Arteritis in North America and South Europe: A Population-Based Study

Francesco Muratore1, Cynthia Crowson 2, Luigi Boiardi 3, Ambra Pinelli 4, Matthew Koster 5, Giovanna Restuccia 1, Tanaz Kermani 6, Eric Matteson 7, Carlo Salvarani 8 and Kenneth Warrington 5, 1Division of Rheumatology, Azienda Unita’ Sanitaria Locale IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy, 2Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, 3Division of Rheumatology, Azienda Unita' Sanitaria Locale IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy, 4Division of Rheumatology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy, 5Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN, 6University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 7Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, Rochester, 8Division of Rheumatology, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: giant cell arteritis, mortality and population studies

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders Poster III: Giant Cell Arteritis

Session Type: Poster Session (Tuesday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: To compare clinical characteristics, treatment, long-term follow-up and prognosis of two population-based cohorts of patients with biopsy-proven giant cell arteritis (GCA) from North America (American cohort) and South Europe (European cohort).

Methods: All patients residing in these two geographic regions with a new diagnosis of biopsy-proven GCA in 1986-2007 were retrospectively identified. Patients were followed from GCA diagnosis to death, migration or September 2011. Comparisons were performed using Chi-square and rank sum tests, Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox models. To account for differences in general population survival between the 2 geographic regions, survival in each GCA cohort was compared to expected rates obtained from age-, sex- and calendar year-specific lifetable rates for the general population of its region.

Results: The study included 110 patients in the American and 144 in the European cohort. Compared with the American cohort, patients from the European cohort were younger (mean±SD age 74.6±7.4 years vs 77.8±7.6, p=0.002), had longer duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis (median [IQR] 1.4 [1.0, 2.7] months vs 0.7 [0.2, 1.3], p< 0.001) and were more likely to have cranial symptoms (93% vs 86%, p=0.048), partial or complete unilateral or bilateral permanent vision loss (21% vs 6%, p=0.001), systemic symptoms (67% vs 46%, p=0.001) and polymyalgia rheumatica at or before GCA diagnosis (47% vs 26%, p< 0.001). ESR and CRP were higher (mean 88±29 mm/h vs 73±77, p< 0.001 and mean 89.0±60.2 mg/L vs 35.2±43.4, p< 0.001 respectively) and hemoglobin lower (mean 11.2±1.4 g/dl vs 11.8±1.4, p=0.004) in European than in the American cohort. Patients from the American cohort received a higher initial prednisone dose (mean 53.6±15.3 mg/day vs 49.5±12.8, p=0.001). There were no differences in relapse rates, cumulative glucocorticoid (GC) dosages at 1, 2 and 5 years, and time to first GC discontinuation.
Overall survival curves showed a better survival of patients with GCA from both study cohorts compared to expected rates obtained from age-, sex- and calendar year-specific lifetable rates for the general population of the respective regions (Figure 1A-B). As shown by survival curves, the mortality of patients with GCA was similar to the general population in the first 6 years from GCA diagnosis (SMR [95% CI] 1.07 [0.72, 1.53], log-rank p-value = 0.71 for the American cohort, and 0.91 [0.65, 1.24], log-rank p-value = 0.55 for the European cohort), but became significantly lower in both study cohorts after 6 years from GCA diagnosis (SMR [95% CI] 0.27 [0.11, 0.57], log-rank p-value < 0.001 for the American cohort, and 0.36 [0.19, 0.61], log-rank p-value < 0.001 for the European cohort). The most common cause of death was heart diseases in both the study cohorts, followed by cancer, pulmonary diseases, infection and stroke.

Conclusion: The clinical features at onset of GCA differ between patients from South Europe and North America. Geographical, genetic and/or environmental factors may contribute to the differences observed in this study. Improvement in survival for the GCA cohorts is a novel finding that will require further validation.


Disclosure: F. Muratore, None; C. Crowson, Crescendo Bioscience, 5, Crescendo BioScience Inc., 5, Crescendo Bioscience Inc., 5, Crescendo Biosciences inc., 5, Pfizer, 2; L. Boiardi, None; A. Pinelli, None; M. Koster, None; G. Restuccia, None; T. Kermani, None; E. Matteson, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Pfizer, 2, Sun Pharmaceuticals, 2; C. Salvarani, None; K. Warrington, Eli Lilly, 2, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, roche, 2, 8, Roche, 2, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, sanofi, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Muratore F, Crowson C, Boiardi L, Pinelli A, Koster M, Restuccia G, Kermani T, Matteson E, Salvarani C, Warrington K. Comparison of Biopsy Proven Giant Cell Arteritis in North America and South Europe: A Population-Based Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-biopsy-proven-giant-cell-arteritis-in-north-america-and-south-europe-a-population-based-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-biopsy-proven-giant-cell-arteritis-in-north-america-and-south-europe-a-population-based-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology