ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1186

Comparison of Biologic Discontinuation in Patients with Elderly-Onset Vs Younger-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis

Michael Richter1, Eric L. Matteson2, John M. Davis III2, Sara J. Achenbach3 and Cynthia S. Crowson3, 1Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 2Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, 3Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologics, Health Care and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Health Services Research Poster II – ACR/ARHP

Session Type: ACR/ARHP Combined Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Several studies have suggested that patients with elderly-onset rheumatoid arthritis (EORA) receive biologic treatments less frequently than patients with younger-onset RA (YORA). This has been demonstrated even in patients with comparable disease activity. Risk of treatment complications and financial challenges associated with Medicare reimbursement may also contribute to this disparity. Our objective was to compare biologic drug discontinuation rates for older vs. younger onset RA, as this is a key outcome measure that could impact prescribing practices.

Methods: A retrospective medical record review was performed of all patients who fulfilled the 1987 ACR criteria for adult-onset RA in 1980-2013 among residents of a geographically defined area with follow up until death, migration or July 1, 2016. EORA was defined as RA diagnosis at age ≥ 65 years and YORA was defined as age 18-64 years. Discontinuation rates were estimated using cumulative incidence adjusted for the competing risk of death. Risk factors were examined using Cox models adjusted for age, sex and calendar year of RA incidence.

Results: 171 cases of EORA and 435 cases of YORA were identified (67% and 71% female respectively, p=0.33). EORA patients had a lower rate smoking at time of RA diagnosis (8% vs. 18%, p=0.002), though ever smoking was not a significant risk factor for starting a biologic (p=0.42). There were no significant differences in rheumatoid factor (RF) or anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (CCP) positivity (p=0.26) or body mass index (BMI) (p=0.23) at time of diagnosis. Cumulative incidence of biologic initiation was lower among EORA compared with YORA (11% vs 19% at 2 year after RA diagnosis, respectively, p<0.001). Among those treated with a biologic, years from RA diagnosis to first biologic was not significantly different between the two groups (p=0.17). Cumulative incidence of first biologic discontinuation was 38% at 1 year (95% confidence interval [CI], 23-61%) and 56% at 2 years (95% CI, 40-79%) for EORA compared with 39% at 1 year (95% CI, 31-49%) and 55% at 2 years (95% CI, 46-65%) for YORA (p=0.61). Concurrent glucocorticoid use at initiation of first biologic was statistically significantly associated with a lower risk for discontinuation in EORA (hazard ratio: 0.19; 95% confidence interval: 0.06-0.59), but not in YORA (interaction p=0.06). There were no significant predictive factors for discontinuation in YORA.

Conclusion: Discontinuation rates of biologic medications did not differ significantly between patients with EORA and YORA.


Disclosure: M. Richter, None; E. L. Matteson, None; J. M. Davis III, None; S. J. Achenbach, None; C. S. Crowson, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Richter M, Matteson EL, Davis JM III, Achenbach SJ, Crowson CS. Comparison of Biologic Discontinuation in Patients with Elderly-Onset Vs Younger-Onset Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-biologic-discontinuation-in-patients-with-elderly-onset-vs-younger-onset-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-biologic-discontinuation-in-patients-with-elderly-onset-vs-younger-onset-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology