ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 388

Comparison of Anti-3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-Coenzyme Α Reductase and Anti-Signal Recognition Particle Necrotising Myopathies: A Single Centre Experience

Su-Ann Yeoh1, Rhys Thomas1, Friederike Baldeweg1, Hoda Alkoky1, Muhammad Shipa1, Fakhirah Badrulhisham2, Hasan Tahir3, Simon Donnelly1, Angela Pakozdi1, Zozik Fattah1 and Aleksandar Radunovic4, 1Department of Rheumatology, Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom, 2Newham University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom, 3Whipps Cross University Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom, 4Department of Neurology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Myopathy and rituximab

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Muscle Biology, Myositis and Myopathies Poster I: Clinical Features and Disease Course

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Immune-mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM) is characterised by paucity of inflammation on muscle biopsy and is associated with antibodies to signal recognition particle (SRP) and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR). IMNM patients tend to be more refractory to conventional immunosuppressive therapies. Previous case series suggested that a more severe clinical course and greater resistance to treatment in anti-SRP myopathy compared to anti-HMGCR. Thus, we aimed to analyse disease characteristics and treatment responses in a single-centre IMNM cohort based on SRP or HMGCR antibody status.

Methods:

All subjects with a diagnosis of IMNM from 2008 to 2017 were included in this retrospective study. Patient electronic records were reviewed and disease subgroups based on antibody status (anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR) were analysed.

Results:

Subgroup

HMGCR

SRP

Number of patients, n (%)

17 (61)

11 (39)

Female, n (%)

13 (76)

6 (55)

Median age at onset, years

(Interquartile range)

62 (57 – 71)

52 (31 – 55)

Ethnicity, n (%)

White British 12 (70.6)

African-Caribbean 2 (11.8)

South Asian 2 (11.8)

Chinese 1 (5.8)

African 8 (72.7)

African-Caribbean 2 (18.2)

White British 1 (9.1)

Median peak creatine kinase, units/L (Interquartile range)

7030 (4143 – 19114)

9750 (3237 – 19022)

Statin exposure, n (%)

14 (82)

1 (9)

Type 2 diabetes, n (%)

11 (65)

0 (0)

Cardiac involvement, n (%)

0/5 (0)

2/6 (33)

Malignancy, n (%)

2 (12)

1 (9)

Rituximab, n (%)

2 (12)

5 (46)

28 patients had a diagnosis of IMNM, of which 39% had anti-SRP and 61% had anti-HMGCR myopathy. SRP patients were predominantly of African or African-Caribbean descent (91%) with more ethnic heterogeneity observed in the HMGCR group. 82% of HMGCR patients were exposed to statins compared to 9% of SRP subjects. Six SRP patients underwent cardiac MRI with two patients demonstrating cardiac involvement whilst myocarditis was not identified in anti-HMGCR myopathy. Two HMGCR patients were identified with malignancies (follicular thyroid carcinoma and low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma) and one SRP patient was identified with prostate adenocarcinoma.

11 HMGCR and 4 SRP patients were initiated on ‘triple therapy’ – pulsed intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) followed by high dose oral prednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and an immunosuppressant (methotrexate or azathioprine). The remainder were initially commenced on either IVMP/prednisolone or IVIg dependent on patient factors (e.g. diabetes).

46% of SRP patients received rituximab therapy (6 months to 9 years post symptom onset) compared to 12% of HMGCR patients (4 to 6 years post symptom onset). 3 SRP patients responded well to rituximab clinically and biochemically (the other 2 patients were followed-up in local hospitals after their first dose of rituximab).

Conclusion:

There were distinct features in our IMNM cohort based on antibody profile. Anti-SRP myopathy disproportionately affected more African and African-Caribbean patients. This group tended to have higher creatine kinase levels and cardiac complications were present in some. Anti-SRP myopathy was associated with a failure to respond adequately to conventional therapies requiring the addition of rituximab more frequently and earlier in the disease course. There is heterogeneity in therapy choice depending on clinician experience and patient factors suggesting the need for further prospective studies and standardised protocols.


Disclosure: S. A. Yeoh, None; R. Thomas, None; F. Baldeweg, None; H. Alkoky, None; M. Shipa, None; F. Badrulhisham, None; H. Tahir, None; S. Donnelly, None; A. Pakozdi, None; Z. Fattah, None; A. Radunovic, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Yeoh SA, Thomas R, Baldeweg F, Alkoky H, Shipa M, Badrulhisham F, Tahir H, Donnelly S, Pakozdi A, Fattah Z, Radunovic A. Comparison of Anti-3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-Coenzyme Α Reductase and Anti-Signal Recognition Particle Necrotising Myopathies: A Single Centre Experience [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme-%ce%b1-reductase-and-anti-signal-recognition-particle-necrotising-myopathies-a-single-centre-experience/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparison-of-anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme-%ce%b1-reductase-and-anti-signal-recognition-particle-necrotising-myopathies-a-single-centre-experience/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology