ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2581

Comparing Treatment Patterns of Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients in the United States and Europe

Theresa Hunter1, David Sandoval Calderon1, Steve Lobosco2, Rachel Moon2, Gary Milligan3 and Rebecca Bolce1, 1Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 2Adelphi Real World, Macclesfield, United Kingdom, 3Adelphi Real World, Macclesfield,, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: axial spondyloarthritis, non-radiographic, treatment and treatment options

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2018

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster III: Treatment

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: To compare TNF inhibitor (TNFi) use and switching patterns among patients with nr-axSpA in the United States (US) and Europe (EU).

Methods: Data from a cross-sectional, multi-national survey of rheumatologists and their consulting axSpA patients conducted in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, and the US were analyzed. Rheumatologists and patients completed forms containing information on current treatment and reasons for switching therapies. 

Results: Data from 391 rheumatologists (299 EU/92 US) and 1,995 patients with nr-axSpA (1513 EU/482 US) were included in this analysis. In the US, 43.8% of patients were female, with a mean age of 42.6 years, while in the EU, 46.6% of patients were female, with a mean age of 41.0 years. In the US, 30.9% were in remission (as reported by their rheumatologist) compared to 41.3% patients in the EU. In the US sample, 57.7% of patients were receiving a TNFi, 35.1% were receiving a cDMARD and 46.3% were receiving a NSAID. In the EU sample, 54.1% were receiving a TNFi, 30.4% were receiving a cDMARD, and 48.3% were receiving a NSAID (Table 1).

US and EU patients that received TNFi (n=1079) had significantly higher physician-reported severity (p<0.0001) and higher levels of pain (p<0.0001) immediately prior to initiation of the current treatment regimen than those patients not receiving biologic therapy (n=916). Of the US patients prescribed a TNFi, 83.6% were receiving their first, 12.2% their second and 4.2% their third or more. Of the EU patients that were prescribed a TNFi, 91.1% were receiving their first, 6.9% their second, and 2.0% their third or more. Lack of remission, poor pain control, and worsening of condition were the main reasons that US patients switched to their current TNFi. Loss of response over time, worsening of condition, and lack of remission were the main reasons that EU patients switched to their current TNFi (Figure 1).  

Conclusion: Even though over half of the patients in this survey were prescribed either a TNFi, cDMARDs, and/or NSAIDS, less than one-third of US patients and less than half of EU patients were in remission. While there was minimal switching of TNFi, when it was done, it was usually due to lack of efficacy, lack of pain relief, and inability to induce or maintain remission. New therapies such as IL-17 inhibitors were not included in this analysis. Additional research needs to be conducted to better understand how IL-17s can be utilized to help nr-axSpA patients achieve better outcomes.

Table 1. Medication use of nr-axSpA patients in the US and EU

EU

(n=1,513)

US

(n=482)

TNF inhibitors

818 (54.1%)

277 (57.4%)

     Adalimumab

321 (21.2%)

116 (24.1%)

     Etanercept

208 (13.7%)

90 (18.7%)

     Infliximab

107 (7.1%)

48 (10.0%)

     Certolizumab Pegol

60 (4.0%)

17 (3.5%)

     Golimumab

122 (8.1%)

8 (1.7%)

cDMARDs

460 (30.4%)

169 (35.1%)

   Methotrexate

284 (18.7%)

90 (18.7%)

   Sulfasalazine

145 (9.6%)

61(12.7%)

   Leflunomide

16 (1.1%)

6 (1.3%)

   Hydroxychloroquine

4 (0.3%)

7 (1.5%)

   Azathioprine

11(0.7%)

5 (1.0%)

NSAIDs

731 (48.3%)

223 (46.3%)

Cox inhibitors

167 (11.0%)

21 (4.4%)

Non-opioid analgesics

150 (9.9%)

12 (2.5%)

Opioids

50 (3.3%)

23 (4.8%)

Oral Steroids

104 (6.9%)

23 (4.8%)

Injection Steroids

17 (1.1%)

12 (2.5%)

Figure 1. Reasons that US and EU nr-axSpA patients switched to their current TNFi

\s

 


Disclosure: T. Hunter, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; D. S. Calderon, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3; S. Lobosco, Adelphi Real World, 3; R. Moon, Adelphi Real World, 3; G. Milligan, Adelphi Real World, 3; R. Bolce, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hunter T, Calderon DS, Lobosco S, Moon R, Milligan G, Bolce R. Comparing Treatment Patterns of Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients in the United States and Europe [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparing-treatment-patterns-of-non-radiographic-axial-spondyloarthritis-patients-in-the-united-states-and-europe/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparing-treatment-patterns-of-non-radiographic-axial-spondyloarthritis-patients-in-the-united-states-and-europe/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology