ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 953

Comparative Symptom Severity of Patients Satisfying Chronic Widespread Pain and Fibromyalgia Criteria

Frederick Wolfe1, Brian Wallitt2, Robert S. Katz3 and Winfried Häuser4, 1National Data Bank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, KS, 2Washington Hospital Center, Baltimore, MD, 3Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 4Klinikum Saarbrücken, Saarbrücken, Germany

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: fibromyalgia

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Fibromyalgia and Soft Tissue Disorders

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Chronic widespread pain (CWP) is often used as a surrogate for fibromyalgia in epidemiological research, particularly in Europe and in whiplash-related injuries. This CWP substitution occurred because it was operationally impossible to perform tender point examinations in epidemiological and survey research. CWP is a requirement for fibromyalgia diagnosis when the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 criteria are used. 20-35% of patients with CWP will also satisfy fibromyalgia criteria. Despite the common use of CWP, it is not clear how closely CWP positive patients resemble those with fibromyalgia, and whether CWP is a valid substitution for fibromyalgia. In this report we determined the relative severity of patients satisfying the CWP and fibromyalgia criteria.

Methods : We studied 6,583 rheumatic disease patients who completed a research questionnaire that contained assessments of criteria and severity variables. Fibromyalgia was diagnosed using the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for fibromyalgia, as modified for survey research. Widespread pain used the 1990 ACR definition: pain above and below the waist, on the left and right sides of the body, and involving the axial skeleton. Severity measures included the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale (PSD) and the Symptom Severity (SS) scale from the 2010 criteria. In addition, we employed other standard assessments of severity, including measures of pain, sleep, fatigue and quality of life. We categorized patients as a) without CWP, b) with fibromyalgia, c) with CWP assuming 20% of CWP cases had FM, and d) with CWP assuming 33% of CWP cases had fibromyalgia (Table 1).

Results : Figure 1 shows the relation of both measures to PSD in the overall sample.  X and y lines cross when probability of diagnosis is >= 0.5. This occurs at 9.3 and 13.3 on the PSD scale for CWP and FM, respectively. Table 1, adjusted for age and sex, demonstrates that patients with fibromyalgia have more severe symptoms than those with CWP at 20% and 33% prevalence levels. For the 3 clinical VAS scales, fibromyalgia patients are approximately 30% more severe than those with CWP.

Conclusion: Patients satisfying fibromyalgia criteria have a more severe illness than those with CWP. The use of CWP as a surrogate measure of fibromyalgia substantially underestimates fibromyalgia severity, but still identifies a group of severe patients.

Table 1. Severity status of patients with fibromyalgia or chronic widespread pain

Variable

Not

Widespread pain

Mean (95% C.I.)

FMS

Mean (95% C.I.)

Widespread Pain

At 20% FM Prevalence

Widespread Pain

At 33% FM Prevalence

VAS Pain (0-10)

2.8 (2.7, 2.9)

6.1 (6.0, 6.3)

4.3 (4.2, 4.4)

4.6 (4.5, 4.7)

VAS Fatigue (0-10)

3.2 (3.1, 3.3)

7.0 (6.9, 7.1)

4.4 (4.3, 4.5)

4.8 (4.7, 5.0)

VAS Sleep problem (0-10)

3.1 (3.0, 3.2)

6.5 (6.3, 6.6)

4.3 (4.2, 4.5)

4.7 (4.6, 4.8)

Mood (0-10)

2.4 (2.3, 2.4)

4.1 (4.0, 4.2)

2.9 (2.8, 2.9)

3.1 (3.0, 3.2)

HAQ (0-3)

0.7 (0.6, 0.7)

1.5 (1.4, 1.5)

1.1 (1.0, 1.1)

1.1 (1.1, 1.2)

VAS Pt. Global (0-10)

2.8 (2.8, 2.9)

5.8 (5.7, 5.9)

4.1 (4.0, 4.2)

4.3 (4.2, 4.4)

SS Scale (0-12)

3.3 (3.2, 3.4)

7.7, (7.6, 7.8)

4.3 (4.2, 4.4)

4.9 (4.8, 5.0)

WS Pain Index (0-19)

2.1 (2.0, 2.3)

12.3 (12.1, 12.4)

8.2 (8.0, 8.4)

8.9 (8.7, 9.1)

PSD scale (0-31)

6.0 (5.8, 6.2)

20.6 (20.4, 20.9)

13.5 (13.2, 13.8)

14.7 (14.5, 15.0)

EQ-5D (0-1)

0.80 (0.79, 0.80)

0.56 (0.55, 0.57)

0.7 (0.7, 0.7)

0.7 (0.7, 0.7)

PCS

41.8 (41.4, 42.1)

29.3 (28.9, 29.8)

34.8 (34.3, 35.2)

33.9 (33.6, 34.3)

MCS

50.5 (50.1, 50.9)

39.5 (39.0, 40.0)

47.6 (47.1, 48.2)

46.3 (45.8, 46.8)

VAS QOL (0-100)

71.2 (70.5, 71.9)

52.6 (51.7, 53.5)

63.4 (62.5, 64.3)

61.8 (61.0, 62.7)

wspfib.jpg


Disclosure:

F. Wolfe,
None;

B. Wallitt,
None;

R. S. Katz,
None;

W. Häuser,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-symptom-severity-of-patients-satisfying-chronic-widespread-pain-and-fibromyalgia-criteria/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology