ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1475

Comparative Risk of Cardiovascular Outcomes Between Topical and Oral Non-Selective Nsaids in Taiwanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Tzu-Chieh Lin1, Daniel H. Solomon2, Sara K. Tedeschi1, Kazuki Yoshida3 and Yea-Huei Kao Yang4, 1Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Division of Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, Boston, MA, 3Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 4College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Institute of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Science, Taian, Taiwan

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease, drug safety and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 14, 2016

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects - Poster II: Co-morbidities and Complications

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Topical NSAIDs (tNSAIDs) have less systemic absorption than oral NSAIDs (oNSAIDs).  Thus, tNSAIDs may be associated with a reduced cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk compared with oNSAIDs.  We examined risk of incident CV events associated with tNSAIDs versus oNSAIDs among Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) patients in Taiwan.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort which included incident RA patients who newly started non-selective tNSAIDs or oNSAIDs. We used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). The first date patients received NSAIDs was defined as the index date, and the 6 month baseline period before the index date was used to define covariates. Patients were excluded if they had NSAIDs exposures, cancer, HIV, psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis claims during the baseline period. Treatment episodes continued until there was a treatment gap more than 30 days.  Follow-up was censored at the first of any of the following: 30-days after treatment was discontinued, switch/addition of other NSAIDs category, CV outcome, death, or the end of study. Patients without any NSAID use for at least 180 days could contribute a second treatment episode. The main outcome was a CV event, including myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure, stroke or revascularization. Inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW) weighted Cox regression model was used to compare the risk of CV events between tNSAIDs and oNSAIDs, with oNSAIDs as the reference group. Sensitivity analyses included varying the length of treatment gap and subgroups.

Results: There were 10,758 and 78,056 treatment episodes for topical and oral NSAIDs indentified from our cohort. The mean age was 55.1±15.4 years in tNSAIDs users and 51.7±15.1 years in oNSAIDs users. tNSAIDs users were also more prevalent in female (82.3% vs. 76.0%), CVD risk factors and co-medications than oNSAIDs users. After weighting by IPTW, the cohorts were well balanced. 34 CV events were found during 1,854.6 person-year follow-up in tNSAIDs users, and 433 CV events in 20,205.3 person-year in oNSAIDs users. The crude CV event rate was 1.87 and 2.14 per 100 person-year in topical and oral NSAIDs groups. Results of IPTW weighted Cox regression found tNSAIDs groups had 36% lower risk for CV events as compared with oNSAID group (table, HR: 0.64; 95%CI: 0.43-0.95). Consistent results were found in sensitivity analyses (figure).

Conclusion: We found tNSAIDs users experienced a reduced risk of CV events compared with oNSAID users.  If future studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up confirm these results, NSAID prescribing might change accordingly.   Table. Incidence and risk of composite CV events in topical and oral NSAIDs recipients

  Follow-up person-year Event (N) Crude incidence per 100 person-year Propensity score adjusted HR* (95%CI)
Topical NSAIDs

(N=10,758)

1,855 34 1.83 0.64 (0.43-0.95)
Oral NSAIDS (N=78,056) 20,205 433 2.14 REF

* Adjusted by Inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW), conditioning on patient demographic information (age, gender, income levels), comorbid conditions and co-medications that correlated with CVDs and traditional and biologic DMARDs patients.

SAS94M2_ForestPlot_GTL

Figure. CV event risk comparing topical NSAIDs versus oral NSAIDs users in the primary analysis and in subgroups.    


Disclosure: T. C. Lin, None; D. H. Solomon, None; S. K. Tedeschi, None; K. Yoshida, None; Y. H. Kao Yang, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lin TC, Solomon DH, Tedeschi SK, Yoshida K, Kao Yang YH. Comparative Risk of Cardiovascular Outcomes Between Topical and Oral Non-Selective Nsaids in Taiwanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-risk-of-cardiovascular-outcomes-between-topical-and-oral-non-selective-nsaids-in-taiwanese-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-risk-of-cardiovascular-outcomes-between-topical-and-oral-non-selective-nsaids-in-taiwanese-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology