ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1615

Comparative Risk of Atrial Fibrillation and Cardiovascular Events between TNF-Inhibitors and Ustekinumab in Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: A Population-Based Multi-Database Study

Moa Lee1, Rishi J. Desai2, Yinzhu Jin3, Gregory Brill1, Alexis Ogdie4 and Seoyoung C. Kim1, 1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 2Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconimics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 3Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 4Medicine/Rheumatology and Epidemiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic agents, Cardiovascular disease, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Clinical Poster II: Clinical/Epidemiology Studies

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Cardiovascular disease is a major comorbidity in patients with psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Increasing evidence suggests a potential reduction in the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) treatment, mainly including tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) with the more recent focus on atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the comparative CV risk with different bDMARDs has not been adequately studied in this patient population.

Methods: Using two large US commercial insurance databases, Optum Clinformatics and MarketScan, we identified patients with PsO or PsA diagnosis initiating ustekinumab or TNFi (i.e., adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab, and golimumab) from September 25, 2009 to September 30, 2015. The primary outcome was incident AF and the secondary outcome was a composite CV event including myocardial infarction, stroke, and coronary revascularization. Patients were followed until the first occurrence of the following events: 1) outcomes, 2) death, 3) plan disenrollment, 4) switching or 5) discontinuing treatment. To account for potential confounding, we estimated propensity score (PS) as the predicted probability of receiving ustekinumab conditioning on 62 covariates including demographic and clinical factors in each database. We used weighting based on PS fine stratification with 50 strata to control for confounding. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of each outcome was estimated using a weighted Cox proportional hazards regression model. We performed all the analyses separately in each of the databases and then combined the HR by a random-effects meta-analysis.  

Results: We identified 60,028 (15,470 in Optum and 44,558 in MarketScan) adult patients with PsO or PsA and no prior AF. The mean age of the cohort was 47.2 ± 12.7, and 51% were female.  81% had diagnosis for PsO while 46% had PsA, and 27% had both PsO and PsA.  After PS stratification, covariates were well balanced between the two groups. As presented in Table 1, 60 incident AF occurred in 9,071 ustekinumab initiators while 323 incident AF did in 50,957 TNF inhibitor initiators (IR=4.7 and 5.0 cases per 1,000 person-year, respectively). MACE occurred in 74 patients among ustekinumab initiators, and 421 of patients initiated TNF inhibitors (IR=6.2 and 6.1 cases per 1,000 person-year, respectively).  The combined HR for AF among the ustekinumab initiators compared to those initiated TNFi was 1.15 (95% CI 0.70-1.89), and for MACE, the HR was 1.14 (95% CI 0.89-1.46).

Conclusion: In this large cohort study of 60,028 patients with PsO or PsA, we found no substantially different risk of AF or CVD after initiation of ustekinumab or TNFi. However, a possible small effect cannot be ruled out warranting further studies with a longer followup.

Table 1. Risk of atrial fibrillation and composite CVD (ustekinumab vs. TNFi) adjusted through PS weighting

Atrial fibrillation

Composite CVD

Ustekinumab

TNFi

Ustekinumab

TNFi

Optum

PS weighted total

2,731

12,671

2,731

12,671

Cases

17

49

13

66

Rate per 1,000 PY

5.0

3.2

3.8

4.3

HR (95% CI)

1.56 (0.90-2.71)

0.88 (0.49-1.60)

MarketScan

PS weighted total

6,331

38,138

6,331

38,138

Cases

43

265

60

288

Rate per 1,000 PY

5.0

5.4

7.0

5.8

HR (95% CI)

0.93 (0.68-1.29)

1.20 (0.91-1.58)

Combined *

HR (95% CI)

1.15 (0.70-1.89)

1.14 (0.89-1.46)

*HR is combined by a random-effects meta-analysis


Disclosure: M. Lee, None; R. J. Desai, None; Y. Jin, None; G. Brill, None; A. Ogdie, Pfizer, Inc.; Novartis, 2,Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Corrona, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, 5; S. C. Kim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2,pfizer, 2,Roche, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Lee M, Desai RJ, Jin Y, Brill G, Ogdie A, Kim SC. Comparative Risk of Atrial Fibrillation and Cardiovascular Events between TNF-Inhibitors and Ustekinumab in Patients with Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis: A Population-Based Multi-Database Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-risk-of-atrial-fibrillation-and-cardiovascular-events-between-tnf-inhibitors-and-ustekinumab-in-patients-with-psoriasis-and-psoriatic-arthritis-a-population-based-multi-database-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-risk-of-atrial-fibrillation-and-cardiovascular-events-between-tnf-inhibitors-and-ustekinumab-in-patients-with-psoriasis-and-psoriatic-arthritis-a-population-based-multi-database-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology