ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0632

Comparative Outcomes of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Versus SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Diabetes: A Propensity-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study

Rusudan Tskitishvili1, Abdallah Hussein2, Roman Karagulyan2, Shatha Shahwan3 and Priju Varghese2, 1Virtua Health, Camden, NJ, 2Virtua Health, Camden, 3Jordan University of Science and Technology, Jordan

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0593–0640) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is associated with a heightened risk of cardiovascular and renal complications, particularly in patients with comorbid diabetes mellitus. While both GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors have shown cardio-renal benefits in the general diabetic population, comparative outcome data in patients with SLE remain limited.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the global TriNetX Collaborative Network and included adult patients (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with both SLE and diabetes between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023. Patients were grouped based on exposure to either GLP-1 receptor agonists or SGLT2 inhibitors. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, while secondary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and lupus nephritis. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to balance baseline characteristics between groups. Risk ratios (RRs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and p-values were calculated for outcome comparisons after matching.

Results: After matching, 885 patients were included in each group. The mean ± SD age was 57.7 ± 12.1 years, with approximately 82% female and 39% identifying as White. Baseline characteristics were well balanced following propensity score matching. The incidence of MACE was significantly lower in the GLP-1 group (3.2%) compared to the SGLT2 group (6.0%; RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.337–0.827; p = 0.0045). Similarly, the incidence of lupus nephritis was significantly lower in the GLP-1 group (4.7%) compared to the SGLT2 group (9.8%; RR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.338–0.689; p < 0.0001). All-cause mortality was slightly lower in the GLP-1 group (1.6%) versus the SGLT2 group (2.1%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.372–1.46; p = 0.737).

Conclusion: Among patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and diabetes, treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists was associated with significantly lower rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and lupus nephritis compared to SGLT2 inhibitors. While all-cause mortality was numerically lower in the GLP-1 group, the difference was not statistically significant. These findings suggest that GLP-1 receptor agonists may offer greater cardio-renal protection in this high-risk population and warrant further investigation in prospective clinical trials.


Disclosures: R. Tskitishvili: None; A. Hussein: None; R. Karagulyan: None; S. Shahwan: None; P. Varghese: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Tskitishvili R, Hussein A, Karagulyan R, Shahwan S, Varghese P. Comparative Outcomes of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Versus SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Diabetes: A Propensity-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-outcomes-of-glp-1-receptor-agonists-versus-sglt2-inhibitors-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-diabetes-a-propensity-matched-retrospective-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-outcomes-of-glp-1-receptor-agonists-versus-sglt2-inhibitors-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-and-diabetes-a-propensity-matched-retrospective-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology