ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2265

Comparative Effects of Raloxifene and Bisphosphonate on Bone Mineral Density and Osteoporotic Fracture Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Kowoon Joo1, Won Park2, Seong-Ryul Kwon3, Mie-Jin Lim3 and Kyong-Hee Jung3, 1Inha University Hospital, Incheon, South Korea, 2Medicine/Rheumatology, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, South Korea, 3Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, South Korea

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Bisphosphonates, Osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease - Clinical Aspects and Pathogenesis: Osteoporosis: Treatment, Safety, and Long Term Outcomes

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) accelerates bone loss, increasing the risk of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. We evaluated the effect of raloxifene and bisphosphonate on bone mineral density (BMD) and osteoporotic fractures in RA patients.

Methods: We retrospectively examined data of 112 seropositive RA patients who were diagnosed with osteoporosis and started on either raloxifene or bisphosphonate from January 2006 to December 2010 with no prior history of either medication. Patients with baseline BMD and at least one follow up BMD were included. The patients were examined for maximum of 3 years with mean follow up period of 2.1 years. Bisphosphonates consisted of risendronate, alendronate or oral ibandronate. Vertebral fractures were defined using Genant’s semiquantitative classification.

Results: Forty-four patients were in the raloxifene group and 68 patients were in the bisphosphonate group. The patients in the raloxifene group were older and lighter in weight compared to the bisphosphonate group (Table 1). The patients in the bisphosphonate group consumed higher doses of calcium and vitamin D through medication compared to the raloxifene group. There was no significant difference in duration of RA, the daily dosage of prednisolone and medication possession ratio between the 2 groups. Thirty-six patients in the raloxifene group and 67 patients in the bisphosphonate group had follow up BMD at 1 year of treatment (Table 2). Nineteen patients in the raloxifene group and 40 patients in the bisphosphonate group had follow up BMD at 2 years of treatment. There was no significant difference in the yearly change of lumbar, total hip and femoral neck BMD from baseline and the number of vertebral fractures between the 2 groups at 1 year and at 2 years of treatment. Eighteen patients in the raloxifene group and 29 patients in the bisphosphonate group had follow up BMD at 3 years of treatment. There was no significant difference in the mean change of lumbar and femoral neck BMD from baseline and the number of vertebral and non-vertebral fractures between the 2 groups at 3 years of treatment. However the mean change of total hip BMD was higher in the bisphosphonate group compared to the raloxifene group.

Conclusion: There was no significant difference in BMD changes and osteoporotic fractures in RA patients treated with raloxifene and bisphosphonate.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics

Table 2. Mean change of BMD from baseline and fracture outcomes.

 


Disclosure:

K. Joo,
None;

W. Park,
None;

S. R. Kwon,
None;

M. J. Lim,
None;

K. H. Jung,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-effects-of-raloxifene-and-bisphosphonate-on-bone-mineral-density-and-osteoporotic-fracture-outcomes-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology