ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0333

Comparative Effectiveness of Secukinumab, Adalimumab and Other Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Used with or Without Methotrexate in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis

Denis Choquette1, Loïc Choquette Sauvageau2, Louis Bessette3, Isabelle Ferdinand2, Boulos Haraoui4, Frédéric Massicotte2, Jean-Pierre Pelletier1, Jean-Pierre Raynauld1, Marie-Anaïs Rémillard2, Diane Sauvageau2, Édith Villeneuve2 and Louis Coupal2, 1Institut de Rhumatologie de Montréal, Montreal, Canada, 2Institut de Rhumatologie de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada, 3Laval University, Quebec, Canada, 4Rheumatology Institute of Montréal, Montreal, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: biologic response modifiers, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster I: Psoriatic Arthritis

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The treatment of psoriatic arthritis has evolved with the addition of agents targeting a different cytokine, Il-17 introduced in 2016. It has proven to be more effective than anti-TNF in controlling the cutaneous manifestation of psoriasis. Recent data have not shown clear superiority on the articular manifestations [EXCEED Study].

Methods: Patients diagnosed with PsA enrolled in RHUMADATA® were selected if they gave informed consent and were treated with secukinumab (SEC), adalimumab (ADA) or other TNF inhibitors (TNFi) on or after January 1, 2016. RHUMADATA® provides socio-demographics, comorbidities, patient-reported outcomes, disease activity indices, laboratory variables, rheumatologist exam report data, use of concomitant medications and PsA treatment. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and proportional hazard models were used to analyze time to treatment cessation.

Results: A total of 305 patients with PsA were extracted from RHUMADATA®. One hundred and eighteen were treated with SEC, 75 with ADA and 112 with other TNFi (certolizumab, golimumab or infliximab. etanercept was not included as it is not an atibody targetting TNFi). Overall, 54.1% were women, average age at diagnosis and disease duration at treatment initiation were respectively 44.3 (±standard deviation (STD)=12.4) and 6.3 (7.9) years. The age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (aCCI) was 1.4 (1.8). The proportion of patients diagnosed or treated for diabetes and hypertension were 13.4% and 37.7%. The patient’s assessment of disease activity, pain and fatigue were 5.5 (2.7), 6.0 (2.8) and 5.5 (3.1). Overall, BASDAI and BASFI scores were 5.6 (2.5) and 4.4 (2.8). The mean number of affected fingers and toes (dactylitis) and enthesitis were 0.9 (1.5) and 0.9 (1.7), respectively. SEC, ADA and TNFi were used in first intention in 25.4%, 61.3% and 37.5% of patients, respectively. CDAI at treatment initiation was 18.5 (11.0), 21.0 (10.2) and 16.6 (8.8) in the SEC, ADA and TNFi groups, respectively. At one-year CDAI, values were 6.1 (7.5), 5.0 (5.4) and 4.9 (3.1). Kaplan-Meier log-rank p-values comparing the three groups in all (Figure 1), first and second, and third+ intentions were 0.5701, 0.6631 and 0.3246, respectively. No pairwise comparisons of treatment (SEC vs. ADA, SEC vs. TNFi, ADA vs. TNFi) showed better retention for any agent. Pairwise comparison of these agents in monotherapy numerically favored SEC over ADA (Figure 2) but failed to reach statistical significance (log-rank p-value=0.5203), and SEC over TNFi (Figures 3) statistically favored SEC over ADA (log-rank p-value=0.0150). A Cox proportional hazard model adjusting for age at diagnosis, disease duration, aCCI, the number of prior advanced therapies, and concomitant use of MTX at treatment initiation as well as selected treatment demonstrated a statistically better retention among patients treated with MTX (Adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval: 0.487 [0.347, 0.683]. Adjusted treatment-MTX interaction terms were non-significant.

Conclusion: Secukinumab in observational data have shown similar efficacy over ADA and other TNFi. The use of these treatments in monotherapy showed similar retention for SEC over ADA , and impreoved retention for SEC over TNFi.

Retention of SEC, ADA and TNFi (all intentions).

Retention of SEC and ADA in monotherapy (all intentions).

Retention of SEC and TNFi in monotherapy (all intentions).


Disclosure: D. Choquette, AbbVie Canada, 5, 8, Amgen Canada, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers-Squibb Canada, 5, 8, Eli Lilly Canada, 5, 8, Merk Canada, 5, 8, Novartis Canada, 5, 8, UCB Canada, 5, Janssen Canada, 5, Sandoz Canada, 5, 8, Pfizer Canada, 5, 8, Roche Canada, 5, Sanofi-Genzyme Canada, 5, 8; L. Choquette Sauvageau, None; L. Bessette, Amgen, 1, 2, 3, BMS, 1, 2, 3, Janssen, 1, 2, 3, UCB, 1, 2, 3, AbbVie, 1, 2, 3, Pfizer, 1, 2, 3, Merck, 1, 2, 3, Celgene, 1, 2, 3, Sanofi, 1, 2, 3, Lilly, 1, 2, 3, Novartis, 1, 2, 3, Gilead, 2, 6, 8; I. Ferdinand, Pfizer Canada, 5, 8, AbbVie Canada, 5, Amgen Canada, 5, 8, Novartis Canada, 5; B. Haraoui, Pfizer Canada, 5, 8, UCB Canada, 5, 8, AbbVie Canada, 5, 8, Amgen Canada, 5, Bristol-Myers-Squibb Canada, 5, Eli Lilly Canada, 5, Merck, 5, Roche Canada, 5, Sanofi-Genzyme Canada, 5, Sandoz Canada, 5, Janssen Canada, 8, Celgene Canada, 8; F. Massicotte, AbbVie Canada, 8, Celgene Canada, 5, Janssen Canada, 8, Pfizer Canada, 5; J. Pelletier, Bioiberica, 8, Bayer Canada, 5, Pierre-Fabre, 5, IBSA, 8, TEVA, 5, Sanofi-Genzyme Canada, 8, Zodiac Laboratory, 5; J. Raynauld, AbbVie Canada, 8, Amgen Canada, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers-Squibb Canada, 8, Celgene Canada, 8, Eli Lilly Canada, 8, Novartis Canada, 8, Pfizer Canada, 8, Roche Canada, 8, Sanofi-Genzyme Canada, 5, 8, UCB Canada, 8, Janssen Canada, 8; M. Rémillard, AbbVie Canada, 5, 8, Amgen Canada, 5, 8, Eli Lilly Canada, 5, 8, Novartis Canada, 5, 8, Pfizer Canada, 5, 8, Sandoz Canada, 5, 8; D. Sauvageau, None; �. Villeneuve, AbbVie Canada, 5, 8, Amgen Canada, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers-Squibb Canada, 8, Celgene Canada, 5, Merk Canada, 8, Novartis Canada, 8, Pfizer Canada, 5, 8, Roche Canada, 5, 8, UCB Canada, 5, 8; L. Coupal, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Choquette D, Choquette Sauvageau L, Bessette L, Ferdinand I, Haraoui B, Massicotte F, Pelletier J, Raynauld J, Rémillard M, Sauvageau D, Villeneuve �, Coupal L. Comparative Effectiveness of Secukinumab, Adalimumab and Other Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Used with or Without Methotrexate in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-effectiveness-of-secukinumab-adalimumab-and-other-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitors-used-with-or-without-methotrexate-in-the-treatment-of-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-effectiveness-of-secukinumab-adalimumab-and-other-tumor-necrosis-factor-inhibitors-used-with-or-without-methotrexate-in-the-treatment-of-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology