ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 311

Comparative Effectiveness of Ayurveda and Conventional Care in Knee Osteoarthritis – a Randomized Controlled Trial

Christian Kessler1,2, Kartar Dhiman3, Abhimanyu Kumar4, Thomas Ostermann5, Shivenarain Gupta6,7, Antonio Morandi8, Martin Mittwede7,9, Elmar Stapelfeldt2, Michaela Spoo2, Katja Icke1, Andreas Michalsen1,2 and Claudia Witt1,10, 1Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany, 2Department for Complementary Medicine, Immanuel Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 3Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences (CCRAS), New Delhi, India, New Delhi, India, 4All India Institute of Ayurveda, New Delhi, India, 5Department of Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Witten Herdeckey, Witten, Germany, 6Department of Kaya Cikitsa, J.S. Ayurveda College & P.D. Patel Ayurveda Hospital, Nadiad, India, 7European Academy of Ayurveda, Birstein, Germany, 8Ayurvedic Point, School of Ayurvedic Medicine, Milan, Italy, 9Department of Theology and Religious Sciences, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany, 10Institute of Complementary and Integrative Medicine, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Clinical research, Complementary alternative medicine, osteoarthritis and pain management, RCT

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Osteoarthritis – Clinical Aspects - Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  Ayurveda is used to treat knee osteoarthritis (OA) despite limited evidence. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of complex multimodality Ayurvedic treatment in comparison to conventional care in OA knee patients.

Methods:  Patients with OA of the knee according to ACR criteria were included in a multicenter randomized, controlled trial and treated in 2 hospital outpatient clinics and 2 private outpatient clinics with a total of 5 physicians and 20 therapists participating. Patients received either Ayurvedic treatment (n=77) or conventional care (n=74) with 15 treatments over 12 weeks. Primary outcome was the change on the Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included the WOMAC subscales, a pain disability index, numeric rating scales for pain and sleep quality, a pain experience scale, a quality-of-life index, a profile of mood index, rescue medication use, and safety issues.

Results: A total of 151 patients (Ayurveda n=77, conventional care n=74) were included. Changes of the WOMAC Index from baseline to 12 weeks were more pronounced in the Ayurveda group (mean difference 61.1 [95% CI 52.4;69.6]) than in the conventional group (32.0 [95% CI 21.4;42.6]) resulting in a significant difference between groups (p<0.001) and a clinically relevant effect size (Cohen’s d 0.68 [95% CI 0.35;1.00]). Similar tendencies were observed for all secondary outcomes at week 12. Effects were sustainable at follow-ups after 6 and 12 month.

Conclusion:  The results suggest that a complex Ayurvedic treatment might be clinically superior to a complex non-surgical conventional intervention in the treatment of OA of the knee.


Disclosure: C. Kessler, None; K. Dhiman, None; A. Kumar, None; T. Ostermann, None; S. Gupta, None; A. Morandi, None; M. Mittwede, None; E. Stapelfeldt, None; M. Spoo, None; K. Icke, None; A. Michalsen, None; C. Witt, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kessler C, Dhiman K, Kumar A, Ostermann T, Gupta S, Morandi A, Mittwede M, Stapelfeldt E, Spoo M, Icke K, Michalsen A, Witt C. Comparative Effectiveness of Ayurveda and Conventional Care in Knee Osteoarthritis – a Randomized Controlled Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-effectiveness-of-ayurveda-and-conventional-care-in-knee-osteoarthritis-a-randomized-controlled-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-effectiveness-of-ayurveda-and-conventional-care-in-knee-osteoarthritis-a-randomized-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology