ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1174

Comparative Cost per Response for Four Clinical Outcomes of Tocilizumab Monotherapy Versus Adalimumab Monotherapy in a Head-to-Head Randomized Double-Blind Superiority Trial in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Jennie H. Best and Jinglan Pei, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Adalimumab, Economics, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tocilizumab

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 22, 2018

Title: Health Services Research Poster II – ACR/ARHP

Session Type: ACR/ARHP Combined Abstract Session

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: The cost-effectiveness of different biologic therapies is an important component in guiding treatment decisions for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this analysis was to compare drug and adverse event costs and cost per successful clinical response with tocilizumab (TCZ) monotherapy vs adalimumab (ADA) monotherapy in patients with RA.

Methods: Patients in the ADACTA trial were randomized to either TCZ 8 mg/kg intravenously every 4 weeks or ADA 40 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks as monotherapy for 24 weeks. Drug costs of $397.71 per 80-mg vial for TCZ (plus $136 administration cost per infusion) and $2220.62 per 40 mg for ADA were based on WAC drug prices (July 2017). Outcomes included patient-level drug costs and cost of hospitalization due to adverse events, and cost per response. Cost per response was calculated by dividing the mean drug plus administration cost by the proportion of patients achieving Disease Activity Score–28 joints (DAS28) < 2.6 (remission) or American College of Rheumatology response criteria 20%/50%/70% (ACR20/ACR50/ACR70). The proportions of patients achieving DAS28 < 2.6, ACR 20, ACR50 and ACR70 were 39.9%, 65.0%, 47.2% and 32.5% for TCZ, respectively, and 10.5%, 49.4%, 27.8% and 17.9% for ADA, respectively; P < 0.0001, P = 0.0038, P = 0.0002, P= 0.0023 for TCZ vs ADA, respectively. Hospitalization costs were calculated using the daily hospital cost of $2433 (2017) and number of hospital days.

Results: Among the 163 patients treated with TCZ and 162 with ADA, mean total drug and administration costs per patient over 24 weeks were $16,674.74 and $23,357.63, respectively. Mean drug and administration costs were lower per each clinical response achieved with TCZ compared with ADA (DAS28 < 2.6: $41,791 vs $222,454; ACR20: $25,653 vs $47,283; ACR50: $35,328 vs $84,020; ACR70: $51,307 vs $130,490). The total hospital days/costs were 32/$77,856 for TCZ and 43/$104,619 for ADA.

Conclusion: In this comprehensive comparative assessment, the cost to achieve all four clinical responses was lower for patients receiving TCZ than for ADA.


Disclosure: J. H. Best, Genentech, Inc., 3; J. Pei, Genentech, Inc., 3.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Best JH, Pei J. Comparative Cost per Response for Four Clinical Outcomes of Tocilizumab Monotherapy Versus Adalimumab Monotherapy in a Head-to-Head Randomized Double-Blind Superiority Trial in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-cost-per-response-for-four-clinical-outcomes-of-tocilizumab-monotherapy-versus-adalimumab-monotherapy-in-a-head-to-head-randomized-double-blind-superiority-trial-in-patients-with-rheumatoi/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/comparative-cost-per-response-for-four-clinical-outcomes-of-tocilizumab-monotherapy-versus-adalimumab-monotherapy-in-a-head-to-head-randomized-double-blind-superiority-trial-in-patients-with-rheumatoi/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology