ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 450

Coming Full Circle with the Omeract RA Flare Questionnaire (RA-FQ): Further Evaluation of the Properties, Meaningfulness, and Utility through Rasch Analysis and Feedback from RA Patients

Susan J. Bartlett1,2, Skye Barbic3, Vivian P. Bykerk4, Bruno Fautrel5, Francis Guillemin6, A den Broeder7, R Alten8, Robin Christensen9, Ernest H. Choy10, Daniel E. Furst11, Sarah Hewlett12, Amye L. Leong13, Lyn March14, Thasia G Woodworth15, Clifton Bingham III16 and OMERACT Flare Group and Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) Investigators, 1Department of Medicine, Division of ClinEpi, Rheumatology, Respirology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 2Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 3University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Divison of Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 5Rheumatology, AP-HP Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital / Pierre and Marie Curie University Paris 6 GRC-08 (EEMOIS), Paris, France, 6University of Lorraine, Nancy, France, 7Rheumatology, Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, Netherlands, 8Schlosspark-Klinik University Medicine, Berlin, Germany, 9The Parker instutute, RC, Copenhagen, Denmark, 10Section of Rheumatology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Great Britain, 11University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 12Academic Rheumatology, University of West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom, 13Spokesperson; Strategic Relations, BONE AND JOINT DECADE, Santa Barbara, CA, 14Department of Rheumatology, Northern Clinical School, Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney & Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, Australia, 15Leading Edge Clinical Research, Stuart, FL, 16Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: Disease Activity, Health outcome, measure and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care - ARHP Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: OMERACT Filter 2.0 encourages use of robust methods to develop new measures.  Instrument results also should be highly relevant, easily scored and interpreted, and meaningful to stakeholders likely to use the instrument. We conducted Rasch analysis to further explore the psychometric properties OMERACT RA Flare Questionnaire (RA-FQ). We reviewed results with RA patients research partners (PRPs) to gain additional insight into the interpretability, meaningfulness, and utility of results.  

Methods: People with RA in Canada (n=896), France (n=138), and the Netherlands (n=178) completed 5 items representing each of the OMERACT RA flare core domains. RUMM2030 was used to evaluate how the five items worked together, fit a unidimensional measurement continuum, and targeted the population of interest. We also evaluated reliability, response options, redundancy, local dependence, and response bias among groups (e.g., men vs. women, age categories, country/language). Ten PRPs first completed the questionnaire then reviewed individual and group findings to provide feedback.

Results: Rasch results supported use of the 5 items as a unidimensional measure of RA flare symptoms and impacts and the simply summation of items for a total score ranging from 0-50. Each item had ordered thresholds and acceptable fit. Reliability, was high (PSI =.91). Items and people covered a continuum ranging from -3.2 to +3.4 logits, and items were well-targeted to respondents. Overall model fit was excellent (χ2 = 31.6, df=45; p=0.935). There was little evidence of differential item functioning by sex, age, or country/language. Items suggest flare symptoms and impacts increased together showing a consistent story of how individuals experience worsening RA disease activity. Among PRPs, scores ranged from 10 to 41. There was unanimous agreement from the patients that the story depicted and individual results obtained were easily understood, meaningful, and very reflective of their current state. Many patients noted that beyond clinical trials, the RA-FQ could also enhance communication between doctors and patients at routine visits. Several noted potential applicability in monitoring day-to-day status and with self management.

Conclusion: The Rasch results offer additional support for the robust psychometric properties of the RA-FQ. Feedback from RA PRPs increases confidence in the relevance, meaningfulness, and easy interpretation of RA-FQ results for clinicians, researchers, and patients.

     


Disclosure: S. J. Bartlett, None; S. Barbic, None; V. P. Bykerk, None; B. Fautrel, None; F. Guillemin, None; A. den Broeder, None; R. Alten, None; R. Christensen, None; E. H. Choy, None; D. E. Furst, None; S. Hewlett, None; A. L. Leong, None; L. March, None; T. G. Woodworth, None; C. Bingham III, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bartlett SJ, Barbic S, Bykerk VP, Fautrel B, Guillemin F, den Broeder A, Alten R, Christensen R, Choy EH, Furst DE, Hewlett S, Leong AL, March L, Woodworth TG, Bingham C III. Coming Full Circle with the Omeract RA Flare Questionnaire (RA-FQ): Further Evaluation of the Properties, Meaningfulness, and Utility through Rasch Analysis and Feedback from RA Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/coming-full-circle-with-the-omeract-ra-flare-questionnaire-ra-fq-further-evaluation-of-the-properties-meaningfulness-and-utility-through-rasch-analysis-and-feedback-from-ra-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/coming-full-circle-with-the-omeract-ra-flare-questionnaire-ra-fq-further-evaluation-of-the-properties-meaningfulness-and-utility-through-rasch-analysis-and-feedback-from-ra-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology