ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 216

Colchicine Prescribing As a Parameter for QA/QI Process in Gout Care

Peter A. Valen1, Maren Mahowald2, Anne Westgard3, Melissa Atwood4,5 and Hollis Krug6, 1Rheumatology/ Dept of Medicine, Minneapolis VA and Univ MN Med School, Minneapolis, MN, 2Rheumatology/ Dept of Medicine, Minneapolis VA and Univ MN Med School, SAINT PAUL, MN, 3Rheumatology, VA Med Center MPLS, Minneapolis, MN, 4Medicine, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN, 5Pharmacy, Minneapolis VA HCS, Minneapolis, MN, 6Medicine, Minneapolis VA and Univ MN Med School, Minneapolis, MN

Meeting: 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 28, 2016

Keywords: colchicine and gout

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2016

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies - Poster I: Clinical Practice

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Because of the large increase in the price of colchicine with the FDA granted market exclusivity the Pharmacy at the Mpls VA HCS asked the Rheumatology Clinic to conduct a QA/QI review related to colchicine prescriptions refillable for up to one year. We intended to evaluate whether the prescribing of colchicine was appropriate related to the certainty of a gout diagnosis or other disorders treated with colchicine. We also evaluated the safety of prescribed colchicine dosing related to renal impairment, control of hyperuricemia in those on chronic colchicine therapy, the presence of co-morbid conditions and potential multiple drug interactions,

Methods: The pharmacy database provided a list of all patients with active, refillable prescriptions for colchicine at the Minneapolis VA HCS. We developed a structured chart review document to gather data from the electronic medical record of those with colchicine prescriptions. Diagnosis of gout was designated as 1) definite gout with urate crystals identified in synovial fluid, tophi, x-ray changes of osseous tophi) 2) probable gout (clinical picture and 6/12 ACR criteria for acute gout), 3) Other diagnoses treated with colchicine included pseudogout, pulmonary fibrosis, pericarditis . 4) Indeterminate reason in the EMR for colchicine yet patient receiving colchicine with/without urate lowering treatment (often in patients co-managed with outside provider 5) No evidence for dx of gout by reported clinical exam, lab tests or x-ray yet taking colchicine. Diagnostic designations 1), 2), 3) were considered appropriate prescribing of colchicine and those with 4) and 5) not appropriate prescribing of colchicine. Laboratory test results, medical history data, x-ray findings, co-morbidities were collected to evaluate the appropriateness of prescribed dosing of colchicine.

Results: 420 patients had prescriptions recorded in the pharmacy database in Nov 2011. The average age was 68.9 yrs (13% <60y; 39% 60-69y; 21% 70-79yr; 25% 80-89y, 3% >90yr) Only 9% of subjects did not have any co-morbidities; 222 had 1 or 2 (53%) and 161 had 3 or 4 (46%). The most common co-morbidities were diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. 32 patients actually did not have active prescriptions for colchicine and 32 had died before the chart review. Colchicine was designated appropriate in three groups: 1) 128 with definite gout (30%), 87 with probable gout (21%) and 20 with pseudogout and other diagnoses (4.7%). In 134 gout diagnosis was indeterminate (32%) and colchicine prescription was not designated as appropriate. Colchicine dosing was appropriate relative to renal function in 91% of patients. Interestingly concomitant urate lowering therapy was prescribed in only 239 (56.8%) with 170 (40.4%) at target uric acid of <7 and 69 (16.4%) with uric acid >7. Of concern is the lack of urate lowering therapy in 129 (30.7%) of those on chronic colchicine.

Conclusion: Assessment of colchicine prescribing revealed areas of deficient quality of care related to chronic administration of colchicine in nearly one third of patients without a definite or probable diagnosis of gout. These patients may be exposed unnecessarily to risk of adverse drug effects and may be subject to additional costs. There is concern for chronic colchicine treatment to suppress gouty arthritis without treatment of associated hyperuricemia because permanent joint damage may occur. Chart review of the electronic medical record to obtain clinical data presents challenges due to incomplete data recording. There was minimal evidence of ongoing monitoring for potential colchicine side effects. Because of these concerns about quality of gout care, we have set up a Gout management clinic to properly evaluate diagnostic data and to monitor responses and side effects to improve the quality of gout care. Thus far 79 patients came to Gout Clinic, 45 no showed, 64 died before appointment, and 165 declined the appointment. We will continue monitoring the quality of gout care in this new clinic.


Disclosure: P. A. Valen, None; M. Mahowald, None; A. Westgard, None; M. Atwood, None; H. Krug, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Valen PA, Mahowald M, Westgard A, Atwood M, Krug H. Colchicine Prescribing As a Parameter for QA/QI Process in Gout Care [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/colchicine-prescribing-as-a-parameter-for-qaqi-process-in-gout-care/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2016 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/colchicine-prescribing-as-a-parameter-for-qaqi-process-in-gout-care/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology