ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 871

Clinicians’ Perspective on Aspects of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis That Influence Patients’ Function and General Health: A Delphi Exercise Based on the International Classification of Function, Disability and Health

Nataliya Milman1, Peter Tugwell2, Annelies Boonen3 and Peter A. Merkel4, 1Division of Rheumatology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2Center For Global Health, Institute of Population Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 3Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands, 4Penn Vasculitis Center, Division of Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: ANCA, outcome measures and vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Vasculitis Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a multisystem condition that results in significant level of morbidity and functional limitations for many patients. Previous studies showed that patients and clinicians prioritize aspects of AAV differently. This study was conducted to determine which aspects of AAV are considered by clinicians most relevant to determining patients’ function and general health.

Methods:

International vasculitis experts were identified by consulting with 3 major vasculitis societies and invited to participate in an email-based three-round Delphi exercise. The International Classification of Function, Disability and Health (ICF) was used to describe the studied aspects of AAV. The ICF is a general health status framework that describes health in terms of hierarchically organized categories from 4 interacting “components”: body functions (BF), body structures (BS), activities and participation (AP), and contextual factors (personal (PF) and environmental (EF)).

In the first open-ended round of the exercise participants were asked to list up to 30 items they considered most relevant to determining patients’ overall health for each of the ICF’s 4 components of health. The participants of the second and third rounds selected those aspects of AAV they consider most important, given the results of the previous rounds. Categories identified by at least 80% of participants of either of the 3 rounds were selected as representative of the clinicians’ perspective.

Results:

82 clinicians were invited to participate in this study and 44 responded; 27 clinicians participated in the first Delphi round, 30 in the second, and 36 in the third. Participants came from 17 countries and several relevant medical specialties (rheumatology, nephrology, pulmonology, otorhinolaryngology, internal medicine, immunology, and allied health professions).

After the third round 20 ICF categories were identified as important by > 80% of participants: 6 BF (energy level, seeing, hearing, pain, respiratory functions and renal function), 7 BS (eyes, ears (especially middle ear), nose (especially saddle nose and nasal crusting specifically), sinuses, lungs (also subglottic stenosis), kidneys, and peripheral nerves, 2 AP (carrying out daily routine and remunerative employment), and 3 EF (side effects of medications, support and relationships, and health services, systems and policies).

Conclusion:

This study identified aspects of AAV considered by clinicians as most relevant for determining the overall health of affected patients. The use of the standardised ICF classification allows comparison of these results across different perspectives. Among the categories identified in this study, “side effects of medications” is the only aspect of AAV that is not sampled by currently accepted core set of outcome measures for AAV which was recently subjected to an ICF-based analysis. An ongoing ICF-based study of the patient perspective on the most important aspects of AAV will allow for direct comparison of perspectives of patients and clinicians and help revise and enhance disease assessment in AAV for use in clinical research and routine care.


Disclosure: N. Milman, None; P. Tugwell, None; A. Boonen, None; P. A. Merkel, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Milman N, Tugwell P, Boonen A, Merkel PA. Clinicians’ Perspective on Aspects of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis That Influence Patients’ Function and General Health: A Delphi Exercise Based on the International Classification of Function, Disability and Health [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinicians-perspective-on-aspects-of-anca-associated-vasculitis-that-influence-patients-function-and-general-health-a-delphi-exercise-based-on-the-international-classification-of-function-disabili/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinicians-perspective-on-aspects-of-anca-associated-vasculitis-that-influence-patients-function-and-general-health-a-delphi-exercise-based-on-the-international-classification-of-function-disabili/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology