ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1160

Clinical Trials in Rheumatoid Arthritis Have Inadequate Racial/Ethnic, Gender and Age Diversity: A Systematic Review

Adrienne Strait1, Francine Castillo 2, Sonam Choden 3, Jing Li 4, Evans Whitaker 5, Titilola Falasinnu 6, Gabriela Schmajuk 3 and Jinoos Yazdany 4, 1UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, 2University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 3UCSF, SFVAMC Division of Rheumatology, San Francisco, CA, 4UCSF Division of Rheumatology, San Francisco, CA, 5UCSF Medical Library, San Francisco, CA, 6Department of Health Research and Policy, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: health disparities and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: Healthcare Disparities In Rheumatology Poster

Session Type: Poster Session (Monday)

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Racial/ethnic minorities, women, and the elderly experience a disproportionate burden of disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), making it particularly important to examine drug therapies in these populations. Clinical evidence demonstrates that treatment responses to new RA biologic drugs differ significantly by race/ethnicity. Despite a national health agenda to improve the representation of diverse populations in clinical trials, there have been few large-scale analyses examining the diversity of clinical trial participants within rheumatology, and none focusing on RA. Our objective was to perform a comprehensive systematic review of RA randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published within the last 10 years in order to characterize the representation of racial/ethnic minorities, women, and the elderly.

Methods: We identified RA RCTs that were published in PubMed (1/1/2008 to 1/1/2018), searching MEDLINE using “Rheumatoid Arthritis” and “humans” as MeSH terms and “randomized controlled trial” as a publication type. The titles and abstracts for all 1195 identified records were independently screened by two reviewers using a web-based application called Rayyan QCRI (https://rayyan.qcri.org). Full texts of remaining records (n=922) were screened using a process adapted from a previously published systematic review. Logistic regression models were used to assess changes in the proportion of subjects in each racial/ethnic and gender category over time. Chi-squared tests were used to 1) compare the proportion of trial enrollees across racial/ethnic groups to the overall demographics of the U.S. and 2) to compare the proportion of female and male enrollees to the overall age-adjusted gender prevalence of RA.

Results: A total of 240 RA RCTs were included in the review (Table 1). The enrollment of minority racial/ethnic groups in U.S.-based RA RCTs was significantly lower than the representation of these groups in the U.S. census population (p< 0.001). While racial and ethnic minorities comprise about 40% of the U.S. population, they only represented 16% of the RCT population for RA. The enrollment of males in RA RCTs with at least one U.S.-based site was significantly lower than the burden of male RA cases nationally (20.4% vs. 28.6%) (p< 0.001). There were no significant changes in the representation of racial/ethnic groups or gender over the observed period (p-trend >0.05) (Figure 1). Reporting of an upper age limit as exclusion criterion was observed in 41.3% (n=99) of the RA RCTs (Table 1).

Conclusion: Despite national efforts to increase clinical trial diversity, there was no trend to improved representation of minority racial/ethnic groups in U.S.-based RA RCTs over the period 2008-2017, with significant underrepresentation of these groups throughout. The results also suggest that men are underrepresented in RA RCTs and that the elderly are often excluded from RA RCTs.

Table 1: Characteristics of the 240 Rheumatoid Arthritis randomized controlled trials included in this review

Figure 1: Trends in racial/ethnic representation in Rheumatoid Arthritis randomized controlled trials with at least one U.S.-based site between 2008 and 2017 -N=29,190 participants-


Disclosure: A. Strait, None; F. Castillo, None; S. Choden, None; J. Li, None; E. Whitaker, None; T. Falasinnu, None; G. Schmajuk, None; J. Yazdany, Astra Zeneca, 5, Pfizer, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Strait A, Castillo F, Choden S, Li J, Whitaker E, Falasinnu T, Schmajuk G, Yazdany J. Clinical Trials in Rheumatoid Arthritis Have Inadequate Racial/Ethnic, Gender and Age Diversity: A Systematic Review [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-trials-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-have-inadequate-racial-ethnic-gender-and-age-diversity-a-systematic-review/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-trials-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-have-inadequate-racial-ethnic-gender-and-age-diversity-a-systematic-review/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology