ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 470

Clinical Response to the First Biologic in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Moderate Disease in a Real World Clinical Cohort

Xiuying Li, Angela Cesta, Mohammad Movahedi and Claire Bombardier, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: Biologic drugs, Disease Activity, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and severity

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis – Clinical Aspects Poster I: Treatment Patterns and Response

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

While most randomized trials assess the effectiveness of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with high disease activity, in the real world or routine care, patients with moderate disease activity are often treated with bDMARDs as well. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the first biologic with or without conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARDs) in patients with moderate disease activity.

Methods:

Biologic naïve patients enrolled in the Ontario Best Practices Initiative (OBRI), with moderate disease activity score (DAS28: >3.2-5.1), or high disease activity score (DAS28: >5.1) were included. Patients were also required to remain on the biologic for 6 months and to have complete follow up data during this time period. Clinical response to their first biologic was measured by the change in DAS28 and by the proportion of patients who reached low disease activity (LDA) during the first 6 months of treatment. The change in DAS28 was assessed using linear regression modelling, adjusted for potential confounders (age, gender, disease duration, and physician global assessment). Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare the proportion of patients who reached LDA in each group at 6 months, adjusting for the same potential confounders.

Results:

The analysis included 443 patients. At initiation of their first biologic, 238 patients had a moderate DAS28 and 205 had a high DAS28. Patient demographics for the two groups are shown in Table 1. At initiation of their first bDMARD, the two groups were similar with respect to age, gender, and disease duration. All of the DAS28 components, as well as the physician global were significantly different between the two groups. A significant change in DAS28 was found in both the moderate disease group [-0.89 (95% CI -1.12, -0.66)] and the high disease group [-1.86 (95% CI -2.10, -1.62)], with greater improvement seen in the high disease activity group. A comparison of the change in DAS28 between the two groups was also significant (0.97±0.16, p<0.0001). After 6 months of biologic treatment, a higher proportion of patients in the moderate DAS28 group reached LDA, when compared to the high DAS28 group (OR: 1.65; 95%CI: 1.03-2.65, p=0.04).

Table 1. Patient Characteristics at initiation of first bDMARD, by DAS28 group

DAS28 group at bDMARDs start

Moderate DAS28 3.2-5.1

High DAS28 >5.1

P – value

N

238

205

Age, years

55.3 (13.2)

57.1 (12.9)

0.14

Female n(%)

192 (80.7%)

169 (82.4%)

0.63

Disease duration, years

7.4 (8.8)

6.7 (7.6)

0.36

DAS28

4.18 (0.54)

5.98 (0.63)

<0.0001

28 swollen joint count

5.4 (3.7)

9.1 (4.7)

<0.0001

28 tender joint count

4.5 (3.5)

12.4 (5.8)

<0.0001

ESR, mm/h

19.1 (16.5)

34.3 (22.7)

<0.0001

CRP, mg/L

8.7 (15.4)

17.7 (24.6)

<0.0001

Patient global assessment (0-10)

5.0 (2.5)

6.7 (2.2)

<0.0001

Physician global assessment (0-10)

4.6 (2.0)

6.3 (1.8)

<0.0001

Rheumatoid factor positive n (%)

160 (72.7%)

143 (75.7%)

0.50

Previous CsDMARDs use ≥2 n(%)

213 (90%)

182 (89%)

0.81

Receiving oral steroid, n (%)

50 (21.0%)

37 (18.1%)

0.43

Values are given as mean (standard deviation) unless otherwise specified.

Conclusion:

Conclusions: Treatment with bDMARDs is effective in patients with moderate disease activity. While patients with high disease activity showed greater improvement after 6 months of biologic treatment, patients with moderate disease activity at initiation of a bDMARD were more likely to reach a LDA state.


Disclosure: X. Li, None; A. Cesta, None; M. Movahedi, None; C. Bombardier, Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer for Musculoskeletal Care Non-remunerativePfizer Research Chair in Rheumatology, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Li X, Cesta A, Movahedi M, Bombardier C. Clinical Response to the First Biologic in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Moderate Disease in a Real World Clinical Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-response-to-the-first-biologic-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-with-moderate-disease-in-a-real-world-clinical-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-response-to-the-first-biologic-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-with-moderate-disease-in-a-real-world-clinical-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology