ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1836

Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis with Polymyalgia Symptoms Only vs Cranial Symptoms Only Treated with Tocilizumab or Placebo in a Randomized Clinical Trial

Robert Spiera1, Sebastian Unizony 2, Min Bao 3, Yves Luder 4, Páris Sidiropoulos 3, Jian Han 3, Jinglan Pei 3 and John Stone 2, 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Massachusetts General Hospital Rheumatology Unit, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 3Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, 4F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologics, giant cell arteritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, tocilizumab and vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 11, 2019

Title: 4M098: Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders II: Large Vessel Vasculitis Treatment (1836–1841)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: GiACTA, a randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)–controlled study, demonstrated the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA).1 Growing evidence has shown that TCZ is also effective for the treatment of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR); however, data on this are limited.2,3 The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of TCZ in patients with GCA presenting with cranial symptoms only or PMR symptoms only in GiACTA.

Methods: GiACTA randomized 251 GCA patients to receive weekly or every other week TCZ plus a 26-week prednisone taper (TCZ + prednisone) or PBO plus a 26- or 52-week prednisone taper (PBO + prednisone).1 In this post hoc analysis, baseline characteristics, sustained remission rate, number of flares, annual flare rate, time to flare, cumulative prednisone dose and safety were assessed in patients with PMR symptoms only and patients with cranial symptoms only at diagnosis. Disease flare was defined as the recurrence of signs or symptoms of GCA (including PMR) or an elevation in erythrocyte sedimentation rate attributable to GCA.

Results: Of 146 patients included in the analysis, 52 had PMR symptoms only and 94 had cranial symptoms only at diagnosis. Demographics and other patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. The hazard ratios for flare in patients receiving TCZ vs PBO were 0.77 (99% CI, 0.26-2.32) for patients with PMR symptoms only and 0.37 (99% CI, 0.13-1.01) for patients with cranial symptoms only. Of patients with PMR symptoms only, 18 flares occurred in 13/31 patients (41.9%) in the TCZ group and 20 flares occurred in 12/21 patients (57.1%) in the PBO group. Of patients with cranial symptoms only, 19 flares occurred in 12/58 patients (20.7%) in the TCZ group and 25 flares occurred in 17/36 patients (47.2%) in the PBO group (Table 2). For both the PMR and cranial symptoms only groups, annual flare rates were lower in patients receiving TCZ compared with those receiving PBO. The occurrence of adverse events and serious adverse events was similar between groups (Table 2).

Conclusion:

TCZ improved clinical outcomes in patients who presented with PMR symptoms only or cranial symptoms only at diagnosis as indicated by a reduced incidence of flares. These findings suggest that TCZ is effective in patients with GCA with PMR or cranial symptoms.

References:

  1. Stone JH, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(4):317-328.
  2. Lally L, et al. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(10):2550-2554.
  3. Devauchelle-Pensec V, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(8):1506-1510.

Acknowledgements: This study was funded by Genentech, Inc. Support for third-party writing assistance, furnished by Health Interactions, Inc. was provided by Genentech, Inc.


Disclosure: R. Spiera, BMS, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, ChemoCentryx, 2, 5, Chemocentryx, 2, Corbus, 2, CSL Behring, 5, Cytori, 2, Formation Biologics, 2, Genentech, Inc., 2, Genzyme/Sanofi, 2, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 2, 5, GSK, 2, 5, Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, 2, Janssen, 5, Mitsubishi, 5, Roche, 2, Roche Genetech, 2, 5, Roche/Genetech, 2, 5, Roche-Genentech, 2, 5, Roche-Genetech, 2, 5, Sanofi, 5, Sanofi-Aventis, 5; S. Unizony, Genentech, Inc., 2; M. Bao, Genentech, 1, 3, Genentech, Inc., 3, Roche, 4; Y. Luder, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, 3, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, 1, 3; P. Sidiropoulos, Genentech, 1, 3, Genentech, Inc., 3; J. Han, Genentech, 1, 3, Genentech, Inc., 3; J. Pei, Genentech, 1, 3, Genentech, Inc., 3; J. Stone, Genentech, 2, 5, Roche, 2, 5, Xencor, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Spiera R, Unizony S, Bao M, Luder Y, Sidiropoulos P, Han J, Pei J, Stone J. Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis with Polymyalgia Symptoms Only vs Cranial Symptoms Only Treated with Tocilizumab or Placebo in a Randomized Clinical Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-outcomes-of-patients-with-giant-cell-arteritis-with-polymyalgia-symptoms-only-vs-cranial-symptoms-only-treated-with-tocilizumab-or-placebo-in-a-randomized-clinical-trial/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-outcomes-of-patients-with-giant-cell-arteritis-with-polymyalgia-symptoms-only-vs-cranial-symptoms-only-treated-with-tocilizumab-or-placebo-in-a-randomized-clinical-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology