ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2607

Clinical Outcomes and Costs of Care for Patients Within the Rheumatoid Arthritis Care Pathway Cohort at a Tertiary Care Integrated Delivery Network: A Comparison to Usual Care

Tarun Sharma1, Tyson Barrett2, Teigan Dwyer3, jessica heintzinger4, Ellen Kraemer1, Sama Hajizadeh1, paul lebovitz5, Adam Dore1 and Susan Manzi1, 1Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, 2Enterprise Data and Analytics, Highmark Health, Pittsburgh, 3Highmark Health, Pittsburgh, PA, 4Autoimmunity Institute, Pittsburgh, 5Medicine Institute, Pittsburgh

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2024

Keywords: #N/A

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 18, 2024

Title: Abstracts: Health Services Research II

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:00PM-4:30PM

Background/Purpose: The RA care pathway initiative at Allegheny Health Network (AHN) was launched in collaboration with Highmark Health with the aim to improve clinical outcomes while optimizing value. Our study aims to compare clinical outcomes, health care utilization and costs between patients in the AHN RA care pathway cohort and patients receiving usual care and thereby identify opportunities for improvement.

Methods: The AHN care pathway initiative was implemented in 3 phases: definition phase, 2020 Q1 (define and align on outcomes that matter, such as classification criteria, outcome measures), data collection and team building phase, 2020 Q2-2021 Q4 (process design and implementation of prospective data capture tools and team-based care), and ultimately measurement phase, 2022 Q1- 2023 Q4 (best practice performance metrics linked to population health and value-based care). At the end of our study in 12/2023, we compared clinical outcomes (percentage of patients in CDAI based remission), health care utilization (ER and inpatient), and per member per month (PMPM) costs of care (total, drug-related and RA-related) of the RA care pathway cohort with usual care among Highmark insured patients.

Results: The RA care pathway cohort included 914 patients at end of the measurement period, of which 372 had continuous Highmark enrollment data. Patient demographics and RA best practice performance metrics in the 1st and 2nd year of measurement period are detailed in table 1. Of these 124 patients had newly diagnosed RA with a median time to remission of 115 days, and 71.3% patients were in remission/low disease activity in the end. A comparison between the care pathway and usual care groups is outlined in table 2. At the end of our study period, the care pathway cohort had significantly higher proportion of patients in remission compared with the usual care group (51.3% vs. 44.1%, OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.05-1.71, p 0.014) with significantly higher rates of remission at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months into the care pathway. Total PMPM costs, biologic costs and adherence were significantly higher in the care pathway group compared to usual care, although RA related costs were marginally higher in usual care at end of study. ER visits were higher in the care pathway cohort in the 1st year and ER/inpatient utilization were numerically higher in usual care in the end. Within the care pathway cohort, patients with moderate-high CDAI had significantly higher infection-related ER visits compared to patients with remission-low CDAI.

Conclusion: Our RA care pathway cohort following guideline-based RA best practices alongside team-based care had significantly higher percentage of patients in remission compared to usual care at end of study. PMPM costs were higher when compared to usual care, primarily due to higher biologic costs and adherence, although RA related costs were marginally lower in the end. Within the care pathway group, infection-related ER visits were higher in patients with moderate-high disease activity. Future efforts to improve RA outcomes will include a focus on the subset of patients with moderate-high disease activity, particularly those with higher ER utilization, emphasizing preventative best practices and addressing adverse social determinants.

Supporting image 1

Table 1: RA Care Pathway Performance Metrics

Supporting image 2

Table 2: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes, Healthcare Utilization and Costs of the Care Pathway Cohort vs. Usual Care


Disclosures: T. Sharma: None; T. Barrett: None; T. Dwyer: None; j. heintzinger: None; E. Kraemer: None; S. Hajizadeh: None; p. lebovitz: None; A. Dore: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 6; S. Manzi: AstraZeneca, 2, 5, BMS, 5, Cartesian, 2, 5, Exagen Diagnostics, Inc., 2, 9, 10, GSK, 2, 5, Lilly, 2, Lupus Foundation of America, 4, Miltenyi, 12, DSMB, Tenet, 2, UCB, 1, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sharma T, Barrett T, Dwyer T, heintzinger j, Kraemer E, Hajizadeh S, lebovitz p, Dore A, Manzi S. Clinical Outcomes and Costs of Care for Patients Within the Rheumatoid Arthritis Care Pathway Cohort at a Tertiary Care Integrated Delivery Network: A Comparison to Usual Care [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024; 76 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-outcomes-and-costs-of-care-for-patients-within-the-rheumatoid-arthritis-care-pathway-cohort-at-a-tertiary-care-integrated-delivery-network-a-comparison-to-usual-care/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2024

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-outcomes-and-costs-of-care-for-patients-within-the-rheumatoid-arthritis-care-pathway-cohort-at-a-tertiary-care-integrated-delivery-network-a-comparison-to-usual-care/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology