ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 114

Clinical Features and Treatment Outcomes in Down’s Arthropathy

Jordan T. Jones1 and Leena Danawala2, 1Rheumatology Division, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, 2University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO

Meeting: 2017 Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium

Keywords: Clinical practice, juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), observation, outcomes and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Thursday, May 18, 2017

Title: Clinical and Therapeutic Poster Session

Session Type: Abstract Submissions

Session Time: 5:30PM-7:00PM

Background/Purpose: Crude prevalence estimates indicate Down’s Arthropathy (DA) is 3-8 times more common than juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), however, DA is still largely under recognized at onset and has a 2 year average delay from onset of symptoms to diagnosis. The majority of DA presents with greater than 5 affected joints, more commonly affecting small joints, and treatment has historically been complex as many don’t tolerate methotrexate (MTX) due toxicity. The objective of this study is to investigate the clinical features and treatment outcomes of DA at our institution.

Methods: In a retrospective chart review, potential DA patients were identified through electronic medical record system (EMR) from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2015. ICD-9-CM codes were used to identify patients (less than 18 years of age) with both Down syndrome (758.0) and JIA (714.3, 714.31, 714.32, 714.33). Individual charts were then manually reviewed to confirm diagnosis of Down syndrome (DS) and JIA. Chart review included analysis of all documents included in EMR, including clinical visits, imaging studies and laboratory results.

Results: Of 26 identified patients, (3 did not have DS and 2 had incomplete records) 21 met inclusion criteria and were analyzed with a mean follow-up period of 4 years (SD 4.2). Patients were 62% female, and 62% had a polyarticular, RF negative presentation at diagnosis. Within this cohort, there was a mean 19 months (SD 16) delay in diagnosis after symptom onset. At JIA diagnosis 71% reported morning stiffness, and on exam there was an average of 14 active joints (SD 10), and 57% of patients had small joint involvement. Mean physician global assessment of disease activity at diagnosis was 4.9 (SD 2.0). Of 18 patients with imaging at diagnosis, erosive changes were noted in 22%. All patients were started on NSAIDs at diagnosis with 33% simultaneously starting a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), and 5 % a biologic. Over the course of disease 62% used a DMARD (mostly MTX [58%]) and 48% used a biologic (mostly etanercept [90%]). Of those on DMARD therapy 54% were discontinued due to side effects and 56% had inadequate response to first-line biologic therapy. At last visit there was an average of 3 active joints (SD 4) and average MD global of 1.7 (SD 1.6).

Conclusion: Down’s Arthropathy remains under recognized despite having a higher prevalence than JIA. There also remains a significant delay to diagnosis which likely contributes to poorer outcomes. Other barriers that inhibit optimal treatment and outcomes are DMARD toxicity and anti-TNF effectiveness, which appears different compared to those in JIA without DS. Earlier diagnosis through improved screening and more targeted treatment may allow for earlier disease control and better outcomes.

 

Table 1. Treatment and Response throughout course of Down’s Arthropathy

Treatment

Patient

(n/total)

Response*

(n/total)

NSAIDs

21/21

5/21

Oral Steroid

5/21

1

Intra-articular Steroid

14/21

3

DMARDs

13/21

 

     Methotrexate

12/13

3/12

     Leflunomide

3/13

0/3

     Sulfasalazine

2/13

1/2

     Hydroxychloroquine

3/13

2/3

Biologics

10/21

 

     Etanercept

9/10

3/9

     Adalimumab

4/10

3/4

     Infliximab

2/10

1/2

     Abatacept

4/10

3/4

*Defined as tolerating and not requiring an increase in therapy

 


Disclosure: J. T. Jones, 5; L. Danawala, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jones JT, Danawala L. Clinical Features and Treatment Outcomes in Down’s Arthropathy [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 4). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-features-and-treatment-outcomes-in-downs-arthropathy/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2017 Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-features-and-treatment-outcomes-in-downs-arthropathy/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology