ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 328

Clinical Characteristics Of Patients Who Switch Biologic Therapy Within The First Two Years: Results From a Large US Registry Population

Philip J. Mease1, Emily Edson-Heredia2, Katherine C. Saunders3, Catherine L. Shuler2, Baojin Zhu2, Monica Chaudhari4 and Jeffrey D. Greenberg5, 1Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, 3Corrona, LLC., Southborough, MA, 4Axio Research LLC, Seattle, WA, 5Departments of Medicine (Rheum Div) and Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York Hospital for Joint Diseases, New York, NY

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic drugs, medication, psoriatic arthritis and registries

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Spondylarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment: Psoriatic Arthritis: Clinical Aspects and Treatment I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

The use of biologic therapy in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has altered the disease course and has been shown to reduce disease activity. Data comparing the clinical characteristics of PsA patients and their biologic therapy switching patterns are sparse.  We sought to compare baseline characteristics at biologic initiation between patients who go on to switch biologic therapy and those who do not switch in the setting of a real-world US registry population.

Methods:

Patients with a current diagnosis of PsA in the CORRONA registry, a large observational registry population in the US, who initiated a biologic were followed for two years to identify whether or not they switched to second biologic. We did not restrict this analysis to patients who were biologic-naïve at initiation.  We defined non-switchers as those who either continued to use initial biologic for the entire follow-up period, or discontinued their initial biologic but did not add a second biologic. Measures of disease activity including MD and patient global assessment of disease, tender and swollen joint counts, CDAI, presence of enthesitis or dactylitis, and MD and patient global assessment of skin were evaluated at initiation and at the end of the observation period. P-values comparing non-switchers to switchers were calculated using the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test to account for skewed distribution of disease activity measures.

Results:

In this population, mean age at PsA onset was 42.4 years: 42.6 for non-switchers and 41.2 for switchers. Median duration of PsA was 6 years:  7 for non-switchers, and 5 for switchers. 54.6% were bio-experienced (53.7% for non-switchers and 58.3% for switchers) and the majority of the population (79.7%) did not switch to another drug (Non-switchers were 451 vs 115 switchers). Switchers had significantly higher mean MD and patient assessment of disease activity, higher mean tender and swollen joint counts, higher mean CDAI and Physician assessment of skin.  Patient assessment of skin (23.7 versus 24.9) was not found to be statistically different. 

Conclusion:

At initiation, patients who go on to switch biologic therapy had worse disease activity compared to those who did not switch.  Rheumatologists appear to switch biologics based on their assessment of both arthritis and skin related disease activity.

Table 1. Comparison of Non-Switchers and Switchers.

 

Non-Switchers N=451

Mean (SD)

Switchers N=115

Mean (SD)

P-value

Physician Global Assessment

17.6 (16.6)

26.1 (20.8)

<.001

Patient Global Assessment

29.2 (24.0)

41.0 (26.8)

<.001

Tender Joint Count

2.7 (4.8)

5.3 (6.9)

<.001

Swollen Joint Count

2.6 (4.3)

4.1 (5.6)

0.002

CDAI

10.0 (9.6)

16.3 (13.1)

<.001

Physician Assessment of Skin

28.0 (30.8)

37.3 (27.6)

0.006


Disclosure:

P. J. Mease,

Celgene,

2,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

2,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

2,

Abbvie,

2,

Amgen,

2,

BiogenIdec,

2,

BMS,

2,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2,

Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P.,

2,

Eli Lilly and Company,

2,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

UCB,

2,

Celgene,

5,

Merck Pharmaceuticals,

5,

Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation,

5,

Abbvie,

5,

Amgen,

5,

BiogenIdec,

5,

BMS,

5,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

5,

Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P.,

5,

Eli Lilly and Company,

5,

Pfizer Inc,

5,

UCB,

5,

Abbvie,

8,

Amgne,

8,

BiogenIdec,

8,

BMS,

8,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

8,

Janssen Pharmaceutica Product, L.P.,

8,

Eli Lilly and Company,

8,

Pfizer Inc,

8,

UCB,

8;

E. Edson-Heredia,

Eli Lilly and Company,

1,

Eli Lilly and Company,

3;

K. C. Saunders,

CORRONA, Inc.,

3;

C. L. Shuler,

Eli Lilly and Company,

1,

Eli Lilly and Company,

3;

B. Zhu,

Eli Lilly and Company,

3,

Eli Lilly and Company,

1;

M. Chaudhari,

Axio Research LLC,

3;

J. D. Greenberg,

CORRONA, Inc.,

1,

AstraZeneca, CORRONA, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Inc,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-characteristics-of-patients-who-switch-biologic-therapy-within-the-first-two-years-results-from-a-large-us-registry-population/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology