ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 468

Clinical and Ultrasonographic Inflammation in DMARD-Naïve Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) – Impact of the 2010 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria Versus the 1987 ACR Classification Criteria

Maria K. Jonsson1,2,3, Siri Lillegraven2, Lena B. Nordberg2, Anna-Birgitte Aga2, Hilde B. Hammer4, Inge C Olsen2, Bjørg-Tilde Fevang1,5, Tore K. Kvien2, Espen A. Haavardsholm2 and the ARCTIC Study Group, 1Dept. of Rheumatology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway, 2Dept. of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 3Dept. of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway, 4Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 5Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: classification criteria and inflammation, Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2015

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects Poster I

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: ACR and EULAR published new classification criteria for RA in 2010, aiming for early identification of patients at risk of developing persistent and erosive arthritis. Ultrasonographic examination (US) yields information on inflammation in joints and tendons in RA. Our aim was to investigate whether US inflammation, as well as clinical measures of inflammation, were different in disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) naïve patients fulfilling only the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria compared to patients fulfilling both the 2010 ACR/EULAR and the 1987 ACR classification criteria for RA.

Methods: RA patients (n=235) who fulfilled the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria were recruited between 2010 and 2013. All patients had symptom duration from first swollen joint < 2 years and were DMARD-naïve with indication for DMARD treatment. US inflammation was evaluated as grey-scale (GS) synovitis and vascularization assessed by power Doppler (PD) in 32 joints by a standardized protocol, with range 0-3 for each joint (1). Clinical inflammation was assessed by 44 swollen joint count, Ritchie Articular Index (RAI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and the Disease Activity Score (DAS). Disease characteristics were compared between the groups using chi-square test, t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test as appropriate.

Results: The 235 patients included had mean (SD) age 51.4 (13.7) years, median disease duration [25, 75 percentiles] 5.7 [2.8, 10.2] months, 62.1% were female, and 81.3% were positive for anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA). Inflammation assessed by DAS, ESR and US was significantly higher in patients fulfilling both the 1987 and 2010 criteria, compared to patients only fulfilling the 2010 criteria (Table). There was no significant discrepancy in gender distribution, age, disease duration or the proportion of ACPA-positive individuals when comparing the two groups.

Conclusion: Patients with early RA fulfilling only the new 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria had less severe disease, both clinically, biochemically and assessed by ultrasonography, compared to patients fulfilling both the 1987 ACR criteria and the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria. This may reflect the change in treatment strategies that has occurred over time, with earlier initiation of DMARD treatment. Long-term outcomes of function and morbidity are needed to understand the potential shift in the RA construct caused by the implementation of the new classification criteria.

Table: Disease characteristics in patients fulfilling only the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria versus both the 1987 ACR and the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria.

Patients fulfilling only the

2010 ACR/EULAR criteria

n=77

Patients fulfilling both the

2010 ACR/EULAR criteria

and the 1987 ACR criteria

n=158

p–value

Female % (n)

62.3 (48)

62.0 (98)

0.96

Age, years1

51.5 (12.8)

51.4 (14.2)

0.99

ACPA-positive % (n)

79.2 (61)

82.3 (130)

0.57

Disease duration3, months2

6.1 [2.9, 9.9]

5.5 [2.8, 10.2]

0.82

DAS-score1

2.9 (1.1)

3.7 (1.0)

<0.001

Swollen joint count2

5 [3, 10]

11 [7, 15]

<0.001

ESR, mm/hr2

16 [10, 26]

22 [13, 36]

0.002

Ritchie Articular index2

5 [3, 8]

8 [4, 13]

<0.001

Total US score GS2

12 [7, 22]

21 [13, 30]

<0.001

Total US score PD2

4 [2, 9]

8 [4, 15]

<0.001

1Mean (SD). 2Median [25, 75 percentiles]. 3Disease duration from first swollen joint.

  


Disclosure: M. K. Jonsson, None; S. Lillegraven, None; L. B. Nordberg, None; A. B. Aga, None; H. B. Hammer, None; I. C. Olsen, None; B. T. Fevang, None; T. K. Kvien, None; E. A. Haavardsholm, AbbVie, 2,Pfizer Inc, 2,MSD, 2,Roche Pharmaceuticals, 2,UCB, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Jonsson MK, Lillegraven S, Nordberg LB, Aga AB, Hammer HB, Olsen IC, Fevang BT, Kvien TK, Haavardsholm EA. Clinical and Ultrasonographic Inflammation in DMARD-Naïve Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) – Impact of the 2010 ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria Versus the 1987 ACR Classification Criteria [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-and-ultrasonographic-inflammation-in-dmard-naive-early-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-impact-of-the-2010-acreular-classification-criteria-versus-the-1987-acr-classification-criteria/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-and-ultrasonographic-inflammation-in-dmard-naive-early-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-impact-of-the-2010-acreular-classification-criteria-versus-the-1987-acr-classification-criteria/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology