ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 165

Clinical and Immunological Features of Antiphospholipid Syndrome in the Elderly: A Retrospective National Multicenter Study

Felix Grimaud1, Cecile Yelnik2, Marc Pineton de Chambrun3, Zahir Amoura3, Laurent Arnaud4, Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau5, Eric Hachulla2, Marc Lambert2, Melanie Roriz1, Jean Sibilia4, Thomas Papo1 and Karim Sacre6, 1Université Paris-Diderot, Paris, France, 2Université de Lille, Lille, France, 3Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France, 4Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France, 5Université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France, 6Bichat Hospital, Paris Diderot University, Paris, France

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Elderly and antiphospholipid

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Antiphospholipid Syndrome Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) mainly affects women who are of child-bearing age. We aimed to describe the clinical and immunological features of APS patients diagnosed after the age of 60.

Methods: The Elderly-Phospholipid study is a national, multicenter, retrospective study involving all APS (2006 revised Sapporo criteria) patients followed in 5 French tertiary university centers including 4 national referral centre for lupus and APS. The clinical and serologic features of patients in whom APS was diagnosed after the age of 60 were analyzed and compared to APS patients included in the Euro-Phospholipid cohort.

Results: Sixty-one patients (40 women (65.6%); 68.2±7 years at diagnosis) were included in the Elderly-Phospholipid study. 70.4% of the patients had primary APS. Stroke was the most common manifestation at diagnosis (36.1%) and during follow up (9.8%). Lupus anticoagulant (LA), aCL and aβ2GPI antibodies were detected in 70.5%, 67.7% and 60.6% of patients, respectively. 37.7% patients were triple-positive for aPL antibodies. All patients were treated with antithrombotic treatment including antiplatelet agents (29.5%) and/or oral anticoagulants (82%). Over a 5.3±3.8 years follow-up, only 5 (8.2%) patients, all receiving oral anticoagulants, developed major bleeding. The mortality rate was 11.5% with a mean age at death of 77.2±6 years. The most common causes of death were infection, haemorrhage and malignancy. As compared to Euro-Phospholipid APS patients who had a mean age of 34±13 years at the onset of the disease, patients in the Elderly-Phospholipid study were more frequently male (p<0.01) and had a higher frequency of  primary APS (p<0.01), stroke (p<0.0001) and LA (p<0.05).

Conclusion: Older patients with late APS onset have a distinct disease profile, with a higher frequency of LA antibody and arterial thrombosis.

Clinical features at disease onset in elderly patients with APS

 

Elderly-Phospholipid (n=61)

Euro-Phospholipid* (n=1000)

P

Stroke, n (%)

22 (36.1)

131 (13.1)

<0.0001

Pulmonary embolism, n (%)

17 (27.8)

90 (9)

<0.0001

Thrombocytopenia, n (%)

13 (21.3)

219 (21.9)

ns

Deep vein thrombosis, n (%)

11 (18)

317 (31.7)

<0.05

Livedo reticularis, n (%)

7 (11.5)

204 (20.4)

ns

Transient ischemic attack; n (%)

6 (9.8)

70 (7)

ns

Epilepsy, n (%)

5 (8.2)

34 (3.4)

ns

Myocardial infarction, n (%)

4 (6.5)

28 (2.8)

ns

Hemolytic anemia, n (%)

3 (4.9)

66 (6.6)

ns

Superficial thrombophlebitis, n (%)

2 (3.3)

91 (9.1)

ns

CAPS, n (%)

1 (1.6)

6 (0.6)

ns

Immunologic findings in elderly patients with APS

 

Elderly-Phospholipid (n=61)

Euro-Phospholipid** (n=1000)

P

Anticardiolipin antibodies, n (%)

41 (67.2)

879 (87.9)

<0.0001

IgG and IgM

5 (8.2)

321 (32.1)

<0.0001

IgG alone

25 (41)

436 (43.6)

ns

IgM alone

11 (18)

122 (12.2)

ns

AntiB2GP1 antibodies, n (%)

37 (60.6)

na

IgG and IgM

6 (9.8)

na

IgG alone

21 (34.4)

na

IgM alone

10 (16.4)

na

Lupus anticoagulant, n (%)

43 (70.5)

536 (53.6)

<0.05

Alone

14 (22.9)

121 (12.1)

<0.05

With anticardiolipin antibodies

4 (6.6)

na

With antiB2GP1 antibodies

2 (3.3)

na

Triple positive aPL

23 (37.7)

na

Antinuclear antibodies, n (%)

33 (54)

597 (59.7)

ns

Anti–double-stranded DNA, n (%)

11 (18)

292 (29.2)

ns

Anti-Ro/SSA, n (%)

7 (11.5)

140 (14)

ns

Anti-La/SSB, n (%)

1 (1.6)

57 (5.7)

ns

Anti-Sm, n (%)

0 (0)

55 (5.5)

ns

ns, not significant (p>0.05); na, not available; CAPS, catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome

* Arthritis Rheumatism, 2002, 46, 1019–1027, Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:1011–1018

 


Disclosure: F. Grimaud, None; C. Yelnik, None; M. Pineton de Chambrun, None; Z. Amoura, None; L. Arnaud, None; N. Costedoat-Chalumeau, None; E. Hachulla, Roche SAS, 5,Chugai Pharma France, 5; M. Lambert, None; M. Roriz, None; J. Sibilia, None; T. Papo, None; K. Sacre, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Grimaud F, Yelnik C, Pineton de Chambrun M, Amoura Z, Arnaud L, Costedoat-Chalumeau N, Hachulla E, Lambert M, Roriz M, Sibilia J, Papo T, Sacre K. Clinical and Immunological Features of Antiphospholipid Syndrome in the Elderly: A Retrospective National Multicenter Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-and-immunological-features-of-antiphospholipid-syndrome-in-the-elderly-a-retrospective-national-multicenter-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/clinical-and-immunological-features-of-antiphospholipid-syndrome-in-the-elderly-a-retrospective-national-multicenter-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology