ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 815

Classic and Atypical Polymyalgia Rheumatica, Are Different Syndromes? Study of 93 Patients with PET/CT from a Single Center

Diana Prieto Peña1, Monica Calderón Goercke1, Javier Loricera2, Isabel Martínez-Rodríguez3, Ignacio Banzo3, Belén Atienza-Mateo4, José Luis Martín-Varillas4, Vanesa Calvo-Río1, Carmen Gonzalez Vela5, Miguel Angel González-Gay2, José Luis Hernández2 and Ricardo Blanco4, 1Rheumatology, Rheumatology. Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla. IDIVAL. Santander. Universidad de Cantabria. Spain, Santander, Spain, 2Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla. IDIVAL. Santander. Universidad de Cantabria. Spain, Santander, Spain, 3Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla. IDIVAL. Santander. Universidad de Cantabria. Spain, Santander, Spain, 4Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla. IDIVAL. Santander. Universidad de Cantabria. Spain, Santander, Spain, 5Pathology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla. IDIVAL. Santander. Universidad de Cantabria. Spain, Santander, Spain

Meeting: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: polymyalgia rheumatica and positron emission tomography (PET)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 21, 2018

Title: Vasculitis Poster I: Non-ANCA-Associated and Related Disorders

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:

Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) is a common inflammatory rheumatic disease of the elderly whose diagnosis is usually based on clinical, analytical and ultrasound findings. However, sometimes patients who present symptoms resembling PMR do not complete fulfill the 2012 EULAR/ACR criteria. It is not well known if these atypical patients behave as those who fulfill criteria. In these cases, Positron Emission Tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) could be a useful tool to assess if these patients have a similar pattern of 18F-FDG uptake to those who fulfill criteria. 

Objectives:

Our aims were: a) to compare clinical and analytical features in patients with classic PMR to atypical PMR, b) to asses if findings in PET/CT differ between both groups.

Methods:

Retrospective study of 93 patients with PMR and their respective PET/CT scans from a single University referral center.  We considered two groups: a) Classic PMR: patients who fulfilled the 2012 EULAR/ACR criteria; and b) Atypical PMR: patients with symptoms resembling classic PMR but did not fulfill the 2012 EULAR/ACR criteria.

Results:

We evaluated 93 patients (30 men/63 women) with a mean age±SD of 69.2±10.8 years. A PET/CT was performed in all of them. Eighty (86%) patients had classic PMR and 13 (14%) atypical PMR. The comparative study is shown in the TABLE. Both groups were receiving similar doses of Prednisone at the time of PET/CT performance. Patients with atypical PMR were younger and had shorter duration of symptoms.  Pain in the pelvic girdle was more frequent in patients with atypical PMR (100% vs 65%) while shoulder girdle pain was higher in patients with classic PMR (23.1% vs 72.5%). No significant differences were found in PET/CT findings between classic and atypical PMR, although large vessel involvement was slightly more frequent in patients with atypical PMR.  

Conclusion:

Patients with atypical PMR used to be younger with a shorter evolution of symptoms and had predominantly pelvic girdle affection. Despite these differences, the pattern of F-FDG uptake in PET/TC was similar in classic and atypical PMR.

 

TABLE

 

 

Classic PMR (n=80)

Atypical PMR (n=13)

P

Sex (women), n (%)

55 (68.8)

8 (61.5)

0.61

Age (years), mean ± SD

70.9±9.8

58.3±10

< 0.01

Duration of symptoms (months), median [IQR]

13.0 [6.0-38.0]

6.0[4.0-11.0]

< 0.01

Clinical symptoms, n (%) *

 

 

 

Neck pain

16 (20.0)

2 (15.4)

0.63

Shoulder girdle pain

58 (72.5)

3 (23.1)

0.02

Pelvic girdle pain

52 (65.0)

13 (100)

0.03

Morning stiffness

19 (23.8)

4 (30.8)

0.68

Inflammatory low back pain

15 (18.8)

3 (23.1)

0.79

Diffuse lower limb pain

27 (33.8)

3 (23.1)

0.51

Laboratory markers, *

 

 

 

Hb (g/dL), mean ± SD

12.7 ± 1.4

12.3 ± 1.6

0.14

Platelet count (x109/l), mean ± SD

280 ±-85.3

276 ±99.5

0.19

CRP (mg/dL), median [IQR]

0.9[0.6-1.3]

0.7 [0.3-1.5]

0.31

ESR (mm/1 st h), median [IQR]

35 [12.0-65.1]

30 [15.7-58.8]

0.21

F-FDG uptake, n (%)

Cervical interspinous bursae

10 (12.5)

1 (7.7)

0.62

Shoulders

47 (58.8)

5 (38.5)

0.21

Sternoclavicular joints

34 (42.5)

6 (46.2)

0.81

Hips

36 (45.0)

6 (46.2)

0.98

Lumbar interspinous bursae

29 (36.2)

5 (38.5)

0.88

Pubic symphysis

2 (2.5)

2 (15.4)

0.09

Subtrochanteric bursae

20 (25.0)

2 (15.4)

0.45

Ischial tuberosities

22 (27.5)

2 (15.4)

0.36

Knees

37 (46.2)

6 (46.2)

0.99

Large vessel involvement

49 (61.3)

10 (76.9)

0.27

Corticosteroids therapy

 

 

 

Dose of Prednisone (mg), mean

10.0 [5.0-15.0]

10.0 [8.1-15.0]

0.99

 

*At the time of PET/TC performance

 


Disclosure: D. Prieto Peña, None; M. Calderón Goercke, None; J. Loricera, None; I. Martínez-Rodríguez, None; I. Banzo, None; B. Atienza-Mateo, None; J. L. Martín-Varillas, None; V. Calvo-Río, None; C. Gonzalez Vela, None; M. A. González-Gay, None; J. L. Hernández, None; R. Blanco, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Prieto Peña D, Calderón Goercke M, Loricera J, Martínez-Rodríguez I, Banzo I, Atienza-Mateo B, Martín-Varillas JL, Calvo-Río V, Gonzalez Vela C, González-Gay MA, Hernández JL, Blanco R. Classic and Atypical Polymyalgia Rheumatica, Are Different Syndromes? Study of 93 Patients with PET/CT from a Single Center [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/classic-and-atypical-polymyalgia-rheumatica-are-different-syndromes-study-of-93-patients-with-pet-ct-from-a-single-center/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/classic-and-atypical-polymyalgia-rheumatica-are-different-syndromes-study-of-93-patients-with-pet-ct-from-a-single-center/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology