ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 154

Cimt in Individuals with Rheumatoid Arthritis Compared to Individuals with Type2 Diabetes

Helen Pahau Sr.1,2, Leanne Short3, Brian Haluskas4, Vibeke Videm5 and Ranjeny Thomas6, 1Diamantina Institute, The University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia, 2Diamantina Institute, University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Brisbane, Australia, 3Cardiovascular Imaging Research Centre, University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia, 4Cardiovascular Imaging Research Centre, the University of Queensland, Woolloongabba, Australia, 5Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's and Women's Health, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, and Department of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Trondheim University Hospital,, Trondheim, Norway, 6University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Brisbane, Australia

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease, Diabetes, intima medial thickness, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ultrasound

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases: Ultrasound

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

It is well known that patients with RA or Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) have increased risk of atherosclerosis and CVD. Carotid ultrasound measurement of the intima media thickness is the most commonly used method to validate progression of atherosclerosis. We aim to investigate the characteristics of cardiovascular risk and progression of carotid intima media thickness in individuals with Rheumatoid Arthritis compared to individuals with type2 diabetes.

Methods

Participants with T2DM were recruited from hospital clinics and the community in the same geographic area as RA participants. The participants with T2DM participated in a randomised trial of exercise intervention for 4 weeks and patients with previous CV events were excluded in that study. All participants were subjected to B-Mode ultrasonography of the common carotid artery to measure Carotid intima media thickness, and to undertake a physical assessment, routine laboratory investigations and history of CV risk profile. Average CIMT were measured on individuals with RA and individuals with Type2 diabetes at two time points, separated by a mean of 4.8 and 2.4 years respectively, using carotid duplex scanning and automated software.

Results

The study comprised 290 individuals: 78 with RA and 212 with T2DM. The RA patients were significantly older and had a higher proportion of smokers and previous CV events. The T2DM had higher BMI, diastolic blood pressure (BP) and triglycerides, lower HDL cholesterol and higher statin use.

At baseline, CIMT measurements were similar in the RA and T2DM cohorts at baseline (0.88mm (0.19) vs. 0.86 (0.21) p=0.80). Despite a shorter follow-up, 91 % of the T2DM cohort had CIMT at follow-up compared to 54 % of the RA cohort (p<0.0005). In a regression model for yearly rate of CIMT change, the only significant variables were diabetes (p<0.0005) and ever use of statins (p=0.01).  Baseline CIMT was not significantly associated with the yearly rate of CIMT change.  In a supplementary adjusted logistic regression analysis where the outcome was CIMT progression compared to unchanged or reduced CIMT, the OR for progression in T2DM compared to RA was 11.4 (5.2-25.0). In the RA cohort, DMARD use at baseline was associated with significantly lower CIMT values at follow-up (p=0.04).

Conclusion Diabetes patients have a much higher risk of CIMT progression than RA patients when adjusting for relevant risk factors and baseline CIMT.


Disclosure:

H. Pahau Sr.,
None;

L. Short,
None;

B. Haluskas,
None;

V. Videm,
None;

R. Thomas,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cimt-in-individuals-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-compared-to-individuals-with-type2-diabetes/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology