ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2482

Choosing Subserologies More Wisely:  Implementing Anti-Nuclear Antibody (ANA) Reflex Testing and Education to Reduce Unnecessary Costs in an Integrated Healthcare System

David Bulbin1, Alicia Meadows2, Sandi Kelsey3, Andrea Berger4, H. Lester Kirchner4, Harold Harrison3 and Alfred E. Denio5, 1Rheumatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, 2Rheumatology, Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA, 3Dept of Pathology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, 4Biostatistics, Geisinger Center for Health Research, Danville, PA, 5Dept of Rheumatology, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: ANA, laboratory tests and quality improvement

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2015

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care Poster Session

Session Type: ACR Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose:  
The American College of Rheumatology published its
Top 5 List of Things Physicians and Patients Should Question as part of the
American Board of Internal Medicine’s Choosing Wisely campaign.  First on the
list was “Don’t test ANA subserologies without a positive ANA and clinical
suspicion of immune-mediated disease. We instituted a system to promote more
cost effective subserology ordering.

Methods:  
We identified 101 of 1100 providers who were over utilizers (more than 2
subserologies ordered when ANA negative in a 26 month period). These providers
received an email informing them of their ordering practice with explanation of
ANA reflex testing, and a link to an online education module. Providers were
surveyed pre and post intervention on their preferred quality improvement method.
We prospectively examined for 1 year subsequent instances of unnecessary
subserology ordering defined as anti-dsDNA, anti-SM/RNP, and SCL70 ordered when
simultaneous ANA was negative. This was compared with the prior 26 months.  If
SLE was suspected, the ANA would reflex if positive to anti-ds DNA, anti-cardiolipin
ab, and anti-Smith/RNP ab.  For Sjogren’s, the positive ANA would reflex to the
SSA/SSB ab. 29/101 providers completed the non-required online education. Generalized estimating equations
models were used to obtain estimates of odds ratios (OR) with their 95%
confidence intervals (CI).  A cluster effect by provider was included in the
model to take into account the correlation within each provider.  Finally, a cost analysis based on the Medicare fee
schedule was performed.
This analysis assumed that when reflex testing was ordered, unnecessary
subserologies were avoided.

Results: Unnecessary subserology ordering across all system
providers decreased significantly after the intervention (OR 0.625, CI 0.425, 0.918,
P-value 0.0167). Over the 26 month pre intervention
period, the mean percentage of unnecessary subserology ordering episodes was
44.5% when the ANA was negative.  In the other 55.6%, the SSA/SSB or anti Jo1
antibodies were ordered which can be appropriate when the ANA is negative. In the
10 month post intervention period, the number of unnecessary instances
decreased to 35.1% of the total.    Surveyed providers preferred reflex testing
and education over other practice improvement strategies. Of the 101 providers
who over utilized subserologies, 26 started using ANA reflex testing.  Cost
analysis showed that ANA reflex testing potentially saved $8,462.50 by reducing
unnecessary subserology utilization.

Conclusion:  The introduction of optional ANA
reflex testing with optional online education led to significant decreases in unnecessary
subserology ordering when the ANA was negative across the entire integrated
health system.  Although, the calculated potential cost savings was not large,
we only examined the instance of simultaneous ANA and subserology ordering when
the ANA was negative, and not the entire spectrum of ordering practices. ANA
reflex testing potentially saves providers time and patients inconvenience for
2nd phlebotomies. We expect that ANA reflex testing will be adopted
by additional providers and are developing a scleroderma reflex test.   

 


Disclosure: D. Bulbin, None; A. Meadows, None; S. Kelsey, None; A. Berger, None; H. L. Kirchner, None; H. Harrison, None; A. E. Denio, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Bulbin D, Meadows A, Kelsey S, Berger A, Kirchner HL, Harrison H, Denio AE. Choosing Subserologies More Wisely:  Implementing Anti-Nuclear Antibody (ANA) Reflex Testing and Education to Reduce Unnecessary Costs in an Integrated Healthcare System [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/choosing-subserologies-more-wisely-implementing-anti-nuclear-antibody-ana-reflex-testing-and-education-to-reduce-unnecessary-costs-in-an-integrated-healthcare-system/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/choosing-subserologies-more-wisely-implementing-anti-nuclear-antibody-ana-reflex-testing-and-education-to-reduce-unnecessary-costs-in-an-integrated-healthcare-system/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology