ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 227

Chinese-American Rheumatology Patients Who Use Traditional Chinese-Medicine Have Worse Patient Reported Outcomes

Kai Sun1, Jackie Szymonifka2, Henghe Tian3, Ya Ju Chang4, Jennifer Leng5 and Lisa A. Mandl6, 1Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell medicine, New York, NY, 2Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 3Internal Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 4Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, NY, 5Immigrant Health and Cancer Disparities laboratory, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 6Rheumatology, Hospital for Special Surgery/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY

Meeting: 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 18, 2017

Keywords: alternative medicine and patient outcomes, PROMIS

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 5, 2017

Title: Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session A

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Chinese-Americans are a fast growing US immigrant group, and many use Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). Ethnic Chinese patients also have worse outcomes in SLE and RA compared to Caucasians. In order to optimally care for this growing population with rheumatic diseases, rheumatologists must have some understanding of patients’ traditional cultural beliefs and practices, which may influence medication taking behaviors, and thus ultimately outcomes. TCM use by Chinese-American rheumatology patients has not previously been studied, and whether patient-reported outcomes differ between TCM users and nonusers is unknown.

Methods: Subjects were recruited from two rheumatology clinics that serve a predominantly Chinese-American immigrant population. Inclusion criteria were English or Mandarin Chinese fluency and being actively treated for a systemic rheumatic disease. Questionnaires were used to assess TCM use, acculturation, and demographics. Self-reported health status was assessed using Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) short forms. Chart review was performed to gather clinical data. Parametric and nonparametric statistics were performed as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression using step-wise selection was used to examine factors independently associated with TCM use.

Results: 230 enrolled, median age 55 years (range 20-97), 65% female, 71% ≤ high school education, 70% Medicaid, and 22% reported English fluency. 50% reported TCM use in the past year, most frequently tuina massage (47%), acupuncture (45%), and herbs (37%). 60% of TCM users used TCM to treat rheumatic disease, but only 34% discussed TCM use with the rheumatologist. TCM users had worse scores in PROMIS® anxiety, depression, pain interference, fatigue, physical function, and social health. There was no difference in PROMIS® scores between herb users and nonusers; however more frequent TCM users and those using TCM to treat rheumatic disease had worse pain and function. In multivariable analysis, older age (Odds Ratio [OR]1.03, p=0.04), female sex (OR 2.3, p=0.02), ≥ some college education (OR 2.1, p=0.04), US residence for ≥20 years (OR 2.2, p=0.03), more anxiety (OR 1.05, p=0.004), fewer years since rheumatic disease diagnosis (OR 1.1, p=0.01), reporting western medicine to be ineffective (OR 5.3, p=0.003), and belief in TCM (OR 2.8, p=0.01) were independently associated with TCM use.

Conclusion: In this group of Chinese-American rheumatology patients with low education, low socioeconomic status, and poor acculturation, TCM use is common (50%) and is independently associated with older age, female sex, better education, longer US residence, higher levels of anxiety, more recent rheumatic disease diagnosis, perceived ineffectiveness of western medicine, and stronger belief in TCM. Providers should ask Chinese-American patients about TCM use because it may be a proxy for unmet therapeutic needs in this population, as TCM users have worse patient-reported outcomes across many important domains.


Disclosure: K. Sun, None; J. Szymonifka, None; H. Tian, None; Y. J. Chang, None; J. Leng, None; L. A. Mandl, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2,American College of Physicians, 3,Up To Date, 7.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Sun K, Szymonifka J, Tian H, Chang YJ, Leng J, Mandl LA. Chinese-American Rheumatology Patients Who Use Traditional Chinese-Medicine Have Worse Patient Reported Outcomes [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017; 69 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/chinese-american-rheumatology-patients-who-use-traditional-chinese-medicine-have-worse-patient-reported-outcomes/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2017 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/chinese-american-rheumatology-patients-who-use-traditional-chinese-medicine-have-worse-patient-reported-outcomes/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology