ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1436

Characterization of Patient Reported Pain Medication in Early Vs. Established Rheumatoid Arthritis

Apoorva Kelkar, Angela Cesta, Xiuying Li and Claire Bombardier, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Date of first publication: September 29, 2015

Keywords: pain management and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2015

Title: Pain: Basic and Clinical Aspects Poster

Session Type: ACR Poster Session B

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Pain control in rheumatic diseases is complex
and various pharmacotherapy approaches can be utilized for management of
rheumatic pain.  Currently, systematic clinical practice guidelines for pain
management in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) are lacking; however, there are several
evidence-based expert recommendations provided by a broad panel of
rheumatologists from the 3e initiative1. Based on these
recommendations, the aim of this study was to describe patient-reported
pharmacotherapy regimens involved in the management of rheumatic pain in early
vs. established RA.

Methods: Patient-reported medication data was collected from
the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI), a clinical cohort of RA
patients followed in routine care. As recommended by the 3e initiative,
patients receiving NSAIDs, acetaminophen (APAP), opioids, antidepressants (AD)
and neuromodulators (NM) at cohort-entry or while in the OBRI were selected (n
= 1,470) and followed till a change in pain therapy was reported. Based on
disease duration, patients were categorized into early RA (disease duration ≤1
year) or established RA (disease duration >1 year). For each group, patient
demographics, common pharmacotherapy regimens and the number of patients
receiving each regimen were determined.

Results: From the selected cohort, 384 patients met the
criteria for early RA and 1,054 patients for established RA. 32 patients did
not indicate their disease duration and were excluded. In early RA, the mean age
± SD of patients was 56.4±14.2 years, 73.2% were female and mean disease
duration ± SD was 0.42±0.49 years. In established RA, the mean age ± SD of
patients was 57.4±12.0 years, 80.0% were female and mean disease duration ± SD
was 11.9±9.41 years. The most common pharmacotherapy regimens and % patients
receiving each regimen are shown in figure 1.

Conclusion: Our study showed that NSAID use as monotherapy
or in combination with other agents was highly prevalent across both groups.
Patients with established disease were more likely to use a combination of NSAIDs
+ APAP and NSAIDs + opioids + APAP possibly due to worsening pain with disease
progression. The use of NSAIDs + opioids was higher in early RA. Physicians may
feel more comfortable prescribing opioids in early RA due to the advent of
Ontario’s Narcotic Monitoring System as well as better patient education and
follow-up with dedicated pain clinics. Further work is required to determine
the association between pain therapy regimens and disease activity measures in
early vs. established RA.

References

1. Whittle SL, Colebatch AN, Buchbinder R, Edwards CJ, Adams K,
Englbrecht M et al. Multinational evidence-based recommendations for pain
management by pharmacotherapy in inflammatory arthritis: integrating systematic
literature research and expert opinion of a broad panel of rheumatologists in
the 3e initiative.Rheumatology2012;51:1416-25.             


Disclosure: A. Kelkar, None; A. Cesta, None; X. Li, None; C. Bombardier, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kelkar A, Cesta A, Li X, Bombardier C. Characterization of Patient Reported Pain Medication in Early Vs. Established Rheumatoid Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; 67 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/characterization-of-patient-reported-pain-medication-in-early-vs-established-rheumatoid-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2015 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/characterization-of-patient-reported-pain-medication-in-early-vs-established-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology