ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 426

Characteristics of Protocol-Specified Responders/Non-Responders Treated With Etanercept Plus Methotrexate in Period 1 of the Prize Study

Paul Emery1, Annette Szumski2, Jack Bukowski3, Eustratios Bananis2 and Lisa Marshall4, 1Institute Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2Specialty Care, Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA, 3Department of Specialty Care, Pfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA, 4Pfizer Inc., Collegeville, PA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologics, Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, Effective, etanercept and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Although frequently effective, treatment with synthetic or biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) does not adequately control disease activity in all patients. Prompt identification of patients unlikely to achieve long-term therapeutic targets is a clinically relevant strategy that may allow for timely alterations in treatment and optimal outcomes. The objective of this subanalysis was to determine disease characteristics of responders and non-responders to treatment with etanercept (ETN) plus methotrexate (MTX) in patients with early, active moderate-to-severe RA participating in Period 1 of the PRIZE study.

Methods: MTX- and biologic-naïve RA patients (DAS28 >3.2; symptom onset ≤12 months from enrollment) received ETN 50 mg QW and MTX (ETN50/MTX) for 52 wk. At the investigator’s discretion, the initial 10 mg/wk MTX dose was titrated to a maximum 25 mg/wk; corticosteroid boosts were administered to patients not achieving low disease activity (LDA; DAS28 ≤3.2) at week 13 and/or 26. Prior DMARD, NSAID, and corticosteroid use and disease characteristics were analyzed in responders at week 39 and 52 (defined as patients with DAS28 ≤3.2 and DAS28 <2.6, respectively) and non-responders at week 39 and 52 (defined as patients with DAS28 >3.2 and DAS28 ≥2.6, respectively, or unsatisfactory response due to efficacy [based on investigators’ judgment]), as specified by the study protocol and using a last observation carried forward approach.

Results: Of 306 patients receiving ETN50/MTX in Period 1, 30 (9.8%) and 24 (7.8%) were non-responders at wk 39 and 52, respectively; 7 (2.3%) had an unsatisfactory response. Among responders (n=194) and non-responders (n=61), 33 (17.0%) and 3 (4.9%) received prior DMARDs, respectively (P=0.018); 80 (41.2%) and 22 (36.1%), prior corticosteroids (P=0.472); and 129 (66.5%) and 31 (50.8%), prior NSAIDs (P=0.027). A lower proportion of responders received corticosteroid boosts than non-responders at week 13 (29.0% v 63.9%) and week 26 (17.0% v 61.7%). DAS28, SDAI, and HAQ values were significantly higher in non-responders at baseline (P<0.01) and from weeks 2-52 (P<0.0001; Table). Significantly lower proportions of non-responders had normal HAQ (≤0.5) vs responders from week 2-52 (P<0.0001). Both responders and non-responders had improved disease activity and function with treatment over time, but non-responders had slower rates of response. Both groups appeared to achieve a steady state by week 39.

 

Table: Differences in disease characteristics at baseline (BL) and weeks 39 and 52 in protocol-specified responders and non-responders to ETN50/MTX at week 52 (LOCF)

Characteristic

Mean (SD)/Adjusted Mean Change (SE)

Mean Difference
(95% CI)

P Value

Responders

Non-Responder

DAS28 at BL

5.9 (1.1)

6.3 (1.1)

 

0.004

     Week 39

     Week 52

2.0 (0.7)/-4.0 (0.06)

1.8 (0.6)/-4.1 (0.06)

3.8 (1.5)/-2.3 (0.12)

4.1 (1.4)/-2.0 (0.11)*

-1.6 (-2.0, -1.4)

-2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)

<0.0001

<0.0001

SDAI at BL

36.4 (13.5)

41.8 (14.7)

 

0.008

     Week 39

     Week 52

2.8 (2.8)/-34.5 (0.6)

2.0 (1.9)/-35.4 (0.6)

15.8 (15.8)/-23.0 (1.0)

16.6 (15.8)/-22.3 (1.0)*

-11.5 (-13.9, -9.2)

-13.1 (-15.4, -10.8)

<0.0001

<0.0001

HAQ at BL

1.2 (0.6)

1.5 (0.7)

 

0.0007

     Week 39

     Week 52

0.3 (0.4)/-0.9 (0.0)

0.3 (0.4)/-1.0 (0.0)

0.9 (0.7)/-0.5 (0.1)

0.9 (0.7)/-0.5 (0.1)*

-0.5 (-0.6, -0.3)

-0.5 (-0.6, -0.4)

<0.0001

<0.0001

 

% of Patients (95% CI)

P Value

Normal HAQ (≤0.5)

 

     Week 39

     Week 52

77.8 (16.5, 28.7)

81.4 (75.2, 86.7)

34.4 (52.3, 77.3)

36.1 (50.6, 75.8)*

<0.0001

<0.0001

*≥50% of patients were discontinued at week 39 and were carried forward to week 52.

Conclusion: In Period 1 of the PRIZE trial, patients with early, moderate-to-severe RA who did not meet protocol-specified response criteria after treatment with etanercept plus methotrexate showed higher levels of disease activity and greater functional disability at baseline and throughout the period, and were more likely to require corticosteroid boosts, compared with patients who satisfied response criteria.


Disclosure:

P. Emery,

Abbott, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche-Chugai, UCB Pharma Ltd,

5;

A. Szumski,

Pfizer Inc,

5;

J. Bukowski,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

E. Bananis,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3;

L. Marshall,

Pfizer Inc,

1,

Pfizer Inc,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/characteristics-of-protocol-specified-respondersnon-responders-treated-with-etanercept-plus-methotrexate-in-period-1-of-the-prize-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology